Without recourse. All Rights Reserved. Tree of Life©
Statement of belief: “Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word
is truth.” (John 17:17 KJV)
Updated 5924[(*??*)]05[1] 11 2028 [2012-08-30]
Updated 5925[(*??*)] 10 17 2029
[2013-01-29] – Revising 25+ (book marked!) incidences of “civil… Tishri 1…” to “Scripture…
Tishri 22…” etc., and 2 Cor 9:2 from “civil…”
to “Scripture…”
Identifying the Years when
the Epistles of Paul, Peter, James, John, and Jude were Written
Abstract:
By comparing the various time references, events, scribes,
and authors, as referenced within the New Testament, it is possible to date
fairly accurately most of the epistles of Paul, Peter, James, John, and Jude.
The only exceptions, for which I have thus far not found a firm basis for
accurate dating, are 2 Peter and 2 & 3 John, all of which must have been
authored later than 1 Peter and 1 John, which latter epistles were written at
Paul’s 2nd visit at Jerusalem. The details of my analysis are found
below and the results are summarized in a table.
Re the time of authorship of Acts and the Four Gospels
Having dated many of the events recorded in the NT, we
can now easily somewhat consider also the dates when the Gospels and Acts were
written. I notice by the word “we” used in Acts 28:16 that the author of Acts
is present in the action described. Luke acted as the scribe of Paul - for the
last time as far as I am aware - while in
As to a latest date of authorship for the four gospels
and Acts one may consider (1) that which is not included in each respective NT
book or epistle, and also (2) whether or not the fact that the Church
of the East is using a 22 book NT canon (excluding 2 Peter, 2&3 John,
Jude, and Revelation.) Could this fact be based upon the Apostle Thomas having
brought with him to
When were Paul’s epistles written?
Paul’s epistle to the Romans:
I
notice that the epistle to the Romans was:
Rom 16:22 I Tertius, who wrote this epistle, salute you in the Lord.
“Written to the Romans from Corinthus, and
sent by Phebe servant of the church at Cenchrea.” Romans 16:27 (KJV.)
But
as best I can tell the Christian churches in Corinth and Cenchrea were
established by Paul as recorded in Acts 18:1-11, 18 (cf. 1 Cor. 16:15.)
Accordingly, Paul’s epistle to the Romans must have been written no earlier
than at the time of the events recorded in Acts 18. In his epistle to the
Romans Paul is sending his greetings to Aquila and Priscilla (
For
instance, in his epistle to the Romans Paul is sending his greetings, not only
to Aquila and Priscilla (
Based
upon:
1.
Paul’s reference to “fellow prisoners” (Romans 16:7,)
2.
The fact that none of Paul’s other epistles is written to a church that
Paul had not first visited, and
3.
The fact that Paul names, in his epistle to the Romans, not a few of
the members of the church in
…I
would, hypothetically and as an alternative, contend that Paul was released from his
detainment as a prisoner in
The above conclusion could
be interpreted to find some support and confirmation also in the following
passages, but how conclusive is such evidence?:
Is Paul talking about “that form of doctrine…
delivered…” by Paul or by someone else?:
In Romans 6:17-18 (cf.
below) Paul states that someone “delivered”
in the past – by Paul when he was in
Rom 6:17 KJVR But God be thanked, that ye were the servants of sin,
but ye
have obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine which was delivered you.
Rom 6:18 KJVR Being then made free from sin, ye became the servants of
righteousness.
There is nothing in this
passage telling us who “delivered…” “that form of doctrine.” It could be Paul if
he had been there before. It could be Aquila and Priscilla in a similar manner
as is recorded in Acts 18:26, as evidenced by their presence in
Is Paul “putting [them] in
mind” i.e. “reminding” them of something he – or else perhaps Aquila and
Priscilla – had shared with the Romans before, or else is he referencing
something they ought to have known ab
initio “from the heart” (cf. Rom. 6:17?:)
Rom 15:15 KJV+ Nevertheless,1161 brethren,80 I have written1125 the more boldly5112 unto you5213 in some sort,575, 3313 as5613 putting you in mind,1878, 5209 because1223 of the3588 grace5485 that is given1325 to me3427 of5259 God,2316
Rom 15:15 GNT+ τολμηροτερον5112 ADV δε1161 CONJ εγραψα1125 V-AAI-1S υμιν5213 P-2DP αδελφοι80 N-VPM απο575 PREP μερους3313 N-GSN ως5613 ADV επαναμιμνησκων1878 V-PAP-NSM υμας5209 P-2AP δια1223 PREP την3588 T-ASF χαριν5485 N-ASF την3588 T-ASF δοθεισαν1325 V-APP-ASF μοι3427 P-1DS υπο5259 PREP του3588 T-GSM θεου2316 N-GSM
Rom 15:15 TLT+ Nevertheless,1161 brethren,80 I have written1125 the more boldly5112 unto you5213 in some sort,575,
3313 in that manner5613 reminding you,1878, 5209 because1223 of the3588 grace5485 that is given1325 to me3427 of5259 God,2316
Here
again there is nothing indicating that the brethren in Rome were being reminded
of something Paul had himself delivered unto them in person, is there?
May we improve on the above
date? Notice what Paul says in Romans 15:23 below! “Many years” should imply a
minimum of three years, should it not? To make sense, in this setting, this
must mean that there were a minimum of three Scripture years between Paul’s stay
in Rome as a prisoner and his writing the epistle to the Romans. Those three
years minimum would then include the Scripture years beginning Tishri 22, 45,
46, and 47 CE until the beginning of Tishri 22, 48 CE.
Rom 15:23 KJV+ But1161 now3570 having2192 no more3371 place5117 in1722 these5125 parts,2824 and1161 having2192 a great desire1974 these(575) many4183 years2094 to come2064 unto4314 you;5209
Rom 15:24 Whensoever5613, 1437 I take my journey4198 into1519 Spain,4681 I will come2064 to4314 you:5209 for1063 I trust1679 to see2300 you5209 in my journey,1279 and2532 to be brought on my way4311 thitherward1563 by5259 you,5216 if1437 first4412 I be somewhat575, 3313 filled1705 with your5216 company.
Rom 15:25 KJV+ But1161 now3570 I go4198 unto1519 Jerusalem2419 to minister unto1247 the3588 saints.40
Rom 15:26 KJV+ For1063 it hath pleased2106 them of Macedonia3109 and2532 Achaia882 to make4160 a certain5100 contribution2842 for1519 the3588 poor4434 saints40 which3588 are at1722 Jerusalem.2419
Accordingly,
I contend, based upon the above premises, that Paul’s epistle to the Romans may
have been written some time, perhaps days, perhaps years, after Tishri
22,
48 CE, which is Nero’s 10th civil year of reign and
Gessius Florus’ 1st civil year of reign in Judea. (However, cf. my
further discussion and conclusion below!)
Correlations that may be of interest:
The war of the Jews began in “Artemisius [Jyar]” according to Josephus, which
is, according to my best calculations thus far, the same as Zif, the Second
Month, 50 CE [Between April 12 and June 9, 50 CE.]
The burning of Rome, a fire beginning
July 19, and raging for 9 days, occurred about 4± years prior to Nero’s
death, and since Nero died on Tishri 9,
52 CE [September (21 or) 22, 52 CE (or, less likely, October 21 (or 22,) 52
CE,)] the famous fire in Rome most likely occurred in 48 CE, give or take a
year. I have not as yet found the year of that fire given in terms of Nero’s
reign.
“18. …Nero next appointed three ex-consuls, Lucius
Piso[AD57], Ducennius Geminus[AD29], and Pompeius Paulinus[AD14or66?]…” (Tacitus,
The Annals, 15:18)
“23. During the consulship of Memmius Regulus and
Verginius Rufus[AD63]…” (Tacitus,
The Annals, 15:23)
“33. In the year of the consulship of Caius Lacanius and
Marcus Licinius[AD64]…” (Tacitus,
The Annals, 15:33)
“…the beginning of this conflagration was on the
19 th of July, the day on which the Senones captured and fired
“47. At the close of the year people talked much about prodigies, presaging
impending evils. Never were lightning flashes more frequent, and a
comet too appeared, for which Nero always made propitiation with noble
blood.” (Tacitus,
The Annals, 15:47)
“48. Silius
Nerva and Atticus Vestinus then entered on the consulship[AD65]…” (Tacitus,
The Annals, 15:48)
“52. …Vestinus, the consul[AD65]…” (Tacitus,
The Annals, 15:52)
“68. …Vestinus also, the consul[AD65]…” (Tacitus,
The Annals, 15:68)
“72. …Petronius Turpilianus, an ex-consul[AD61]…” (Tacitus,
The Annals, 15:72)
http://www.ourcivilisation.com/smartboard/shop/tacitusc/annals/index.htm
“The burning of
“690 Tacitus, The Annals, 15.41.” Important
Dates in the Lives of Jesus and Mary, p. 164.
http://www.ourcivilisation.com/smartboard/shop/tacitusc/annals/chap15.htm
“James was killed in the spring, about the time of Passover,
in Nero’s 10th year. The burning of
706 Tacitus, The Annals, 15.41. ” Important
Dates in the Lives of Jesus and Mary, p. 165.
Tacitus reports a second comet a few years later, at
the end of the year of the burning of
943 Tacitus, The Annals, Loeb Classical Library,
15.47. See also: Tacitus, The Annals of Imperial Rome, Penguin Books, p.
367.” Important Dates in the Lives of Jesus and Mary, p. 204.
Tacitus notes that the second comet was
seen near the end of the year and was interpreted as a bad omen for events
occurring after the burning of
Important Dates in the Lives
of Jesus and Mary, p. 205.
Tacitus describes a second comet a few years later, at
the end of the year of the burning of
Important Dates in the Lives of Jesus and Mary, p. 205.
“Burning and
Rebuilding of the City.—In the tenth year
of his reign occurred a great fire
which destroyed a large part of the city of
Nero has been accused of
arranging the burning of
There were comets seen
in 46 CE and probably in 49 CE which were seen as evil omens and which induced
Nero to kill many aristocrats.
What, if any, of all of these
is being reflected in Paul’s epistle to the Romans, or elsewhere?
Contrary arguments (and a better
alternative than the above stated:) In favor of the Epistle to the Romans
having been authored prior to Paul’s arrival in
What
might be some evidence against my contention, above, that Paul’s epistle to the
Romans may have been written after Paul being released from bondage in
Are
the following passages evidence in favor of the epistle to the Romans having
been written prior to Paul’s arrival in
1.
Does this text indicate that Paul had
never before “come unto” the Romans, or else that he had not been able to
return as soon as he had “purposed to”?
Rom 1:13
KJVR
Now I would not have you ignorant, brethren, that oftentimes I purposed
to come unto you, (but was let hitherto,) that I might have some fruit among
you also, even as among other Gentiles.
Rom 1:13 KJV+ Now1161 I would2309 not3756 have you ignorant,50, 5209
brethren,80 that3754 oftentimes4178 I purposed4388 to come2064 unto4314 you,5209 (but2532 was let2967 hitherto,)891, 1204 that2443 I might have2192 some5100 fruit2590 among1722 you5213 also,2532 even2532 as2531 among1722 other3062 Gentiles.1484
Rom 1:13
GNT+
ου3756 PRT-N θελω2309 V-PAI-1S δε1161 CONJ υμας5209 P-2AP αγνοειν50 V-PAN αδελφοι80 N-VPM οτι3754 CONJ πολλακις4178 ADV προεθεμην4388 V-2AMI-1S ελθειν2064 V-2AAN προς4314 PREP υμας5209 P-2AP και2532 CONJ εκωλυθην2967 V-API-1S αχρι891 PREP του3588 T-GSM δευρο1204 ADV ινα2443 CONJ τινα5100 X-ASM καρπον2590 N-ASM σχω2192 V-2AAS-1S και2532 CONJ εν1722 PREP υμιν5213 P-2DP καθως2531 ADV και2532 CONJ εν1722 PREP τοις3588 T-DPN λοιποις3062 A-DPN εθνεσιν1484 N-DPN
Rom 1:13 TLT+ Now1161 I would2309 not3756 have you ignorant,50, 5209
brethren,80 that3754 oftentimes4178 I purposed4388 to come2064 unto4314 you,5209 (but2532 have been
prevented2967 until the present,)891, 1204 that2443 I might have2192 some5100 fruit2590 among1722 you5213 also,2532 even2532 as2531 among1722 other3062 Gentiles.1484
I see nothing in this
verse indicating that Paul had ever been in
1. “I… have been prevented
until the present [point in time;]” and
2. “that I might have some
fruit among you also, even as among other Gentiles.”
The second of these seems
a rather strong hint that Paul had no basis for claiming any fruit from prior
work in Rome, i.e. he had not been there; unless, that is, one were to consider
this verse as describing a necessary delay between sowing “many years” (Rom.
15:23) prior to reaping “some fruit” (Rom. 1:13,) but this latter suggestion
may seem somewhat farfetched, does it not?
2.
Is verse 15 evidence that Paul had
never preached the gospel to the Romans before writing his epistle to the
Romans?:
Rom 1:15
KJV+
So,3779 as much as in me is,2596, 1691 I am ready4289 to preach the
gospel2097 to you5213 that3588 are at1722 Rome4516 also.2532
Rom 1:15
GNT+
ουτως3779 ADV το3588 T-NSN κατ2596 PREP εμε1691 P-1AS προθυμον4289 A-NSN και2532 CONJ υμιν5213 P-2DP τοις3588 T-DPM εν1722 PREP ρωμη4516 N-DSF ευαγγελισασθαι2097 V-AMN
Rom 1:15 TLT+ Accordingly,3779 as
far as I am concerned,3588,
2596, 1691 I am now ready4289 to preach the
gospel2097 also2532 to you5213 that3588 are in1722 Rome4516.
This
verse seems a clear cut indication that Paul had never, at the time of writing
his epistle to the Romans, preached the gospel to the Romans, does it not?
3.
Had Paul not traveled beyond Illyricum
prior to writing Romans and is
Rom 15:19 KJV+ Through1722 mighty1411 signs4592 and2532 wonders,5059 by1722 the power1411 of the Spirit4151 of God;2316 so that5620 from575 Jerusalem,2419 and2532 round about2945 unto3360 Illyricum,2437 I3165 have fully preached4137 the3588 gospel2098 of Christ.5547
Click on the map for the original larger
map!
Looking at the above map I
wonder whether Paul is giving reference to the entirety of Illyricum, i.e. even
unto the most distant borders of Illyricum adjacent to northern
Rom 15:20 KJV+ Yea,1161 so3779 have I strived5389 to preach the gospel,2097 not3756 where3699 Christ5547 was named,3687 lest3363 I should build3618 upon1909 another man’s245 foundation:2310
Rom 15:21 KJV+ But235 as2531 it is written,1125 To whom3739 he was not3756 spoken312 of,4012 they(846) shall see:3700 and2532 they3739 that have not3756 heard191 shall understand.4920
Rom 15:22 KJV+ For which cause1352 also2532 I have been much4183 hindered1465 from coming2064 to4314 you.5209
Apparently, based upon these
verses, someone else had brought the gospel to
4.
How long had Paul been “hindered from
coming to” the Romans?
Rom 15:22 KJV+ For which cause1352 also2532 I have been much4183 hindered1465 from coming2064 to4314 you.5209
Rom 15:23 KJV+ But1161 now3570 having2192 no more3371 place5117 in1722 these5125 parts,2824 and1161 having2192 a
great desire1974 these(575) many4183 years2094 to come2064 unto4314 you;5209
Rom
15:24 KJV+ Whensoever5613, 1437 I take my journey4198 into1519 Spain,4681 I will come2064 to4314 you:5209 for1063 I trust1679 to see2300 you5209 in my journey,1279 and2532 to be brought on my way4311 thitherward1563 by5259 you,5216 if1437 first4412 I be somewhat575, 3313 filled1705 with your5216 company.
The words “these many years” should indicate a minimum
of three years but may well indicate that Paul had never before been able to
visit the believers in
The first time
i.
The Scripture year beginning Tishri 22,
39 CE, i.e. Paul met
ii.
Nero’s 2nd or 3rd
year of reign, i.e. the Scripture
years beginning Tishri 22, 40 and Tishri 22, 41, respectively. Notice in Acts
19:21 Paul’s desire to “see
iii.
In
Accordingly,
Paul’s statement “having a great desire these many
years
to
come unto you;” cannot very well have been written less than three full
Scripture years after Nero’s
1st year, which began Tishri 22, 39 CE, or, in other words: Based
upon Romans 15:22-24, Paul’s epistle to the Romans cannot very
well have been written prior to the Scripture year beginning Tishri 22, 43 CE,
Nero’s 5th civil year of reign.
5.
Was this trip of Paul to
Rom 15:25 KJV+ But1161 now3570 I go4198 unto1519 Jerusalem2419 to minister unto1247 the3588 saints.40
Rom
15:26 KJV+ For1063 it hath pleased2106 them of Macedonia3109 and2532 Achaia882 to make4160 a certain5100 contribution2842 for1519 the3588 poor4434 saints40 which3588 are at1722 Jerusalem.2419
Rom
16:27 KJV Written to the Romans from
Corinthus, and sent by Phebe servant
of the church at Cenchrea.
Writing at Corinth Paul is here giving reference to certain
contributions out of the Macedonian and Achaian congregations. Are these
contributions the same ones as those referenced in 1
Corinthians 16:2-3 and/or 2 Corinthians 9, or may we assume that the
contributions here named are later events not referenced anywhere but in Paul’s
epistle to the Romans? Naturally, a recorded event, such as is referenced in 1
& 2 Corinthians, is stronger evidence than is an assumption of ours, albeit
based upon prior behavior such as evidenced by 1& 2 Corinthians, isn’t it?
What is the timing of the 1 & 2 Corinthians contribution “of
Act 20:3 TLT+ But5037 after spending4160 three5140 months3376 there, when there began1096 against
him846 to be laid plans1917 under5259 the3588 Jews,2453 being at the point of3195 setting sail321 into1519
Act 20:3 KJV+ And there abode three months. And when the Jews laid wait for him, as he was
about to sail into
I
have found that Paul’s First epistle to the Corinthians was written from
I’ve also
found that Paul authored his Second Epistle to the Corinthians from
Philippi some time between the 7th month, Tishri (1 or) 22, 43 CE and
Aviv 15, 44 CE [between
September 24, 43 CE and April 19, 44 CE.] In 2 Corinthians 13:1-2 Paul has
recorded his tentative plans to visit Corinth a third time, but I have found no
record of him actually traveling to Corinth a third time before leaving
Philippi for Jerusalem as recorded in Acts 20:4-6.
Lastly, I’ve found that
after writing 2 Corinthians Paul left for
Accordingly, Romans 15:26 may be used as evidence that Paul’s
Epistle to the Romans was written from Corinth either before writing 2
Corinthians at the point in time being referenced in Acts 20:3, i.e. at or
before the beginning of the year beginning Tishri 22, 43 CE, or else, a less
likely scenario, after writing 2 Corinthians during an unrecorded – besides
Paul’s stated intent (cf. 2 Cor. 13:1-2) – third visit of Paul to Corinth
between the 7th month, Tishri 22,
43 CE and Aviv 15, 44 CE [between
September 24, 43 CE and April 19, 44 CE.]
This result agrees well with each of the last 5.
Was this trip of Paul to Jerusalem in
behalf of the Macedonians and Achaians his first or not? items, does it not? The questions then that remains
to resolve is whether or not Romans was written before or after Paul’s arrival
in Rome and whether or not all these biblical passages can be harmonized with
one other.
Weighing the evidence – Romans
written before or after Paul’s visit to
Of the 3.
The fact that Paul names, in his epistle
to the Romans, not a few of the members of the church in Rome, arguments in favor of the Epistle to the Romans
having been authored after Paul’s release from Rome I find that at least the 2.
The fact that none of Paul’s other
epistles is written to a church that Paul had not first visited, andnd
argument – based upon the fact that
none of the other epistles was written to a church not previously visited by
Paul - may be easily refuted, e.g. by the fact that during this particular time
period not a few of his epistles were being written, i.e. Paul seems to have
been in “a writing mood.”
The 3.
The fact that Paul names, in his epistle
to the Romans, not a few of the members of the church in Rome,rd
argument – Paul naming not a few of
the members of the Roman church – may be explained by e.g. these members having
moved to Rome from elsewhere where Paul had previously met them, or else by
Paul knowing them indirectly, perhaps through Aquila and Priscilla.
The 1.
Paul’s reference to “fellow prisoners”
(Romans 16:7,)st
argument – that about
“fellow prisoners” - may be the hardest one to refute without resorting
to detaching such symbolisms from a physical reality of being an actual
prisoner in fact. The fact that all other instances of Paul’s using such
verbiage are found in Ephesians 3:1 and Philemon 1:1, 9, & 23, each of
which were authored by Paul from
Ephesians 6:24 KJV “Written from
Philemon 1:25 KJV “Written from
However, looking more closely at Romans 16:7
and Paul’s use of words, elsewhere in his writings, translated “prisoner of
Christ” etc. I first notice that there are two distinct and separate Greek words
being used as a basis for the English word “prisoner,” i.e. Strong’s G4869 and
G1198.
Rom 16:7 Salute782 Andronicus408 and2532 Junia,2458 my3450 kinsmen,4773 and2532 my3450 fellow prisoners,4869 who3748 are1526 of note1978 among1722 the3588 apostles,652 who3739 also2532 were1096 in1722 Christ5547 before4253 me.1700
Eph 3:1 For this cause5484, 5127 I1473 Paul,3972 the3588 prisoner1198 of Jesus2424 Christ5547 for5228 you5216 Gentiles,1484
Phm 1:1 Paul,3972 a prisoner1198 of Jesus2424 Christ,5547 and2532 Timothy
5095 our brother,80 unto Philemon5371 our dearly beloved,27 and2532 fellow laborer,4904
Phm 1:9 Yet for love's sake1223, 26 I rather3123 beseech3870 thee, being5607 such a one5108 as5613 Paul3972 the aged,4246 and1161 now3570 also2532 a prisoner1198 of Jesus2424 Christ.5547
Phm 1:23 There salute782 thee4571 Epaphras,1889 my3450 fellow prisoner4869 in1722 Christ5547 Jesus;2424
G4869: “συναιχμάλωτος, sunaichmalōtos, soon-aheekh-mal'-o-tos,
From G4862 and G164; a co-captive: - fellowprisoner.”
G164: “αἰχμαλωτός, aichmalōtos, aheekh-mal-o-tos',
Fromαἰχμή
aichmē (a spear) and a derivative of the same as G259; properly a prisoner
of war, that is, (generally) a captive: - captive.”
G1198: δέσμιος, desmios,
des'-mee-os, From G1199; a captive (as bound)
G1199: δεσμόν, δεσμός, desmon desmos, des-mon', des-mos'. Neuter and masculine respectively from G1210; a band,
that is, ligament (of the body) or shackle (of a prisoner)
Clearly
Paul was a prisoner of
Besides Philemon 1:23 the
name Epaphras occurs twice only in the New Testament, each time emphasizing
Epaphras’ relation to Christ with a word comparable to G4869:
G4889: “σύνδουλος, sundoulos,
soon'-doo-los, From G4862 and G1401; a co-slave, that is, servitor
or ministrant of the same master (human or
divine)”
G1401: “δοῦλος, doulos,
doo'-los, From G1210; a slave (literally or figuratively,
involuntarily or voluntarily; frequently therefore in a qualified sense of subjection
or subserviency.)”
Besides possibly Col. 1:7 (cf. also discussion
below,) I have seen no evidence that Epaphras was ever a prisoner of
Further
corroboration of this usage of Strong’s G4869 by Paul is found in the fact that
Strong’s G4869 is used only thrice in the New Testament, two of which are
referenced above (Romans 16:7 & Philemon 1:23,) the third passage being:
Aristarchus is named five
times in the New Testament (Acts 19:29; 20:4; 27:2; Col. 4:10 & Philemon 1:24,)
and although Aristarchus was once “caught” (Acts 19:29) he was later free (Acts
20:4) and there is no evidence that Aristarchus was a co-captive with Paul in
Rome at the time of Paul’s writing Col. 4:10 above, is there? Notice that
Paul’s Epistle to the Colossians was written from
Col. 4:18 KJV “Written from
Additional historical basis for arguing against Paul’s
Epistle to the Romans having been written after Paul’s release as a captive of Rome
may be found in the fact that, if written after that point in time, it must
have been written also after Tishri 22,
48 CE. But Tishri 22, 48 CE is after the burning of Rome and near the
beginning of Nero’s persecution of the Christians in 49 CE, facts that Paul
would likely be aware of, and if so it would certainly seem that some mention
touching upon these events would be found in Paul’s Epistle to the Romans,
would it not? And yet, I find nothing in Paul’s Epistle to the Romans hinting
at such a situation, do you?
I find that Paul’s Epistle to the Romans was written prior to Paul’s arrival in
Rome as a prisoner of Rome, and that it was written from Corinth before Paul’s
writing 2 Corinthians at the point in time being referenced in Acts 20:3, i.e.
at or before the beginning of the year beginning Tishri 22, 43 CE [October
15, 43 CE,] or else, a less likely scenario, after writing 2
Corinthians during an unrecorded – besides Paul’s stated intent (cf. 2 Cor.
13:1-2) – third visit of Paul to Corinth between the 7th month, Tishri (1 or) 22, 43 CE and Aviv 15, 44 CE [between September 24, 43 CE and
April 19, 44 CE.]
Nonetheless,
I find no biblical evidence that Paul was not released from his being a Roman
captive, or that he was not able to continue as intended on his intended
journey to Spain (cf. Rom. 15:24, 28.) On the contrary, I find that Paul left his abode in Rome
after the year ending at the beginning of Tishri
22, 45 CE, which time was well before the burning of
Rome (beginning July 19, 48 CE,) and thus also well before Nero’s beginning
to persecute the Christians. Who knows, if indeed Paul was able to go on to
Spain as intended, perhaps his preaching the gospel in Spain somehow influenced
Galba into taking responsibility for not co-operating in the ever escalating
madness and excesses of Nero? (Cf. Tacitus, The Histories, Book
One:13:2 and Suetonius, The Twelve Caesars, p. 248-9 (translator Robert
Graves,) and (Suetonius, The Lives of
the Caesars, GALBA:IX))
Servius Sulpicius Galba succeeded Nero as Emperor of Rome after revolting with
his army in 52 CE
after “he ruled Tarragonian Spain for eight years” as Roman Governor, i.e. from
about 45 CE.
Indeed,
Paul’s Epistle to the Hebrews gives us several
indications that he had been released at the time when the Epistle to the
Hebrews was being authored!
Let’s
see what confirmation of these conclusions we may found while dating also the
other epistles of Paul…
Paul’s First epistle to the Corinthians:
Additional
evidence that Paul was the one who established the Christian church in Corinth (cf.
also the involvement of Silvanus and Timothy as per 2 Cor. 1:19,) which city is
located on the island or peninsula of Achaia, and therefore also evidence that
Paul could not have written the epistle to the Romans prior to the time of the
events recorded in Acts 18, is found in the following:
Notice
Paul’s claiming to be the one who laid the chief cornerstone of the Christian
church in
1Co 2:1 And I, brethren, when I came to you, came not
with excellency of speech or of wisdom, declaring unto you the testimony of
God.
1Co 2:2 For I determined not to know any
thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified.
Notice how Paul identifies, in verse 2 above, his
focus, his main message, the chief cornerstone of the Christian church in
Next, notice Paul’s claim in laying that foundation,
verses 5, 6, and 10 below!:
1Co 3:4 For while one saith, I am of Paul; and
another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal?
1Co 3:5 Who then is Paul, and who is
Apollos,
but ministers
by whom ye believed, even as the Lord gave to every man?
1Co 3:6 “I [Paul] have planted, Apollos
watered; but God gave the increase.”
1Co 3:7 So then neither is he that planteth any
thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase.
1Co 3:8 Now he that planteth and he that watereth are
one: and every man shall receive his own reward according to his own labor.
1Co 3:9 For we are laborers together with God: ye are
God's husbandry, ye are God's building.
1Co 3:10 According to the grace of God which is given
unto me, as a wise masterbuilder, I [Paul] have laid the foundation,
and another buildeth thereon. But let every man take heed how he buildeth
thereupon.
1Co 3:11 For other foundation can no man lay than that is
laid, which is Jesus Christ.
Accordingly
it is amply clear that Paul claims to be the one who laid the foundation of the
Christian church in
Rom 16:5 “…Salute my well-beloved Epaenetus, who is
the firstfruits of Achaia [Achaia is the Greek island/peninsula upon
which
In 1 Cor. 16:15 I read:
“…know the house of Stephanas, that it is the firstfruits of Achaia, and
that they have addicted themselves to the ministry of the
saints…”
But…:
“The
first epistle to the Corinthians was written from
Since
apparently Stephanas, Paul’s scribe writing 1 Corinthians (1 Cor 16:24,) is the
same Stephanas referenced in 1 Cor. 16:15, and since Stephanas was “the
firstfruits” resulting from the work of Paul (Acts 18:1-18; 19:21,) or else of
Apollos (Acts 18:27,)…
1Co 3:6
“I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase.”
…in
Achaia, therefore 1 Corinthians must have been written no earlier than at the
time of the events recorded in Acts 20:1-2, i.e. shortly prior to the time
referenced as “three [lunar] months” (Acts 20:3 KJV, cf. more below!) that Paul spent in Greece...
Act 20:3 TLT+ But5037 after spending4160 three5140 months3376 there, when there began1096 against
him846 to be laid plans1917 under5259 the3588 Jews,2453 being at the point of3195 setting sail321 into1519
Act 20:3 Textus Receptus ποιησας4160 V-AAP-NSM τε5037 PRT μηνας3376 N-APM τρεις5140 A-APM γενομενης1096 V-2ADP-GSF αυτω846 P-DSM επιβουλης1917 N-GSF υπο5259 PREP των3588 T-GPM ιουδαιων2453 A-GPM μελλοντι3195 V-PAP-DSM αναγεσθαι321 V-PPN εις1519 PREP την3588 T-ASF συριαν4947 N-ASF εγενετο1096 V-2ADI-3S γνωμη1106 N-NSF του3588 T-GSM υποστρεφειν5290 V-PAN δια1223 PREP μακεδονιας3109 N-GSF
Act 20:3 KJV And5037 there abode4160 three5140 months.3376 And when(5259) the3588 Jews2453 laid wait for1917, 1096 him,846 as he was about3195 to sail321 into1519 Syria,4947 he purposed1096, 1106 to return5290 through1223 Macedonia.3109
The
year when Paul was in Greece (Acts 20:2-3) must be either 41, 42, or 43 CE,
because the events of Acts 19:10 clearly did precede the events of Acts 20:1-3,
and the words “by the space of two years” (Acts 19:10 KJV) most likely
references Nero’s 2nd
civil year of reign, i.e. the civil year beginning Tishri (1 or) 22, 40 CE.
(Cf. link re “two years”
and re “three months”
for more details!)
But
we can narrow this down further. Paul is stating in his speech to the Ephesians:
Act 20:31 KJV Therefore watch, and remember, that by the space of
three years I ceased
not to warn every one night and day with tears.
This
verse is more accurately translated:
Act 20:31 TLT+ Therefore watch, and remember, that during Year Three [of Nero’s reign] I ceased not to warn every one night and day
with tears.
The
1st record of Paul being in
The
record of Paul’s 2nd visit to
Paul’s
3rd visit to the Ephesians referencing his 2nd visit to
them: Paul’s speech to the Ephesians occurred during the very few hours when he
stopped by to visit with them in Nero’s 5th year of reign, in the spring
of 44 CE, when he was on his way to Pentecost in
If
Paul spent only part of Year Three with the Ephesians then he did in fact not
arrive in
However,
based upon the context and the wording of his speech I find it more likely that
the intent of Paul’s words is that he spent the entire Third Year of Nero’s
reign with the Ephesians. This conclusion finds support also in the brevity of
the account re the events between Paul’s visit to
Accordingly
I conclude that Paul’s 2nd visit to
The
entirety of Paul’s 1st epistle to the Corinthians is very much
focused upon applications of, and lessons learnt from, events and traditions
associated with the Feast of Unleavened Bread, for instance the Lord’s Passover
supper / holy communion (1 Cor. 11:17-30,) Yeshua’s crucifixion and
resurrection during Passover and the Feast of Unleavened Bread (1 Cor.
15:1-28,) the teachings about leavening, which are strongly tied to Jewish
Passover celebrations (1 Cor. 5:6-8,) etc., etc..
Based
upon said general focus of 1 Cor. and, in addition very specific statements of
Paul (cf. the text in bold italics below,) it is amply
clear that Paul’s
First epistle to the Corinthians was written within a few weeks, i.e.
“shortly” (1 Cor. 4:19,) prior to the upcoming Passover and Feast of
Unleavened Bread 43 CE [i.e in the beginning of the Julian year 43 CE:]
1Co 4:19 But I will come to you shortly, if the
Lord will, and will know, not the speech of them which are puffed up, but the
power.
1Co 5:6 Your glorying is
not good. Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump?
1Co 5:7 Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may
be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover
is sacrificed for us:
1Co 5:8 Therefore let us keep the feast,
not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but
with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.
1Co 16:2 TLT+ Upon2596 the Seventh Day of the Unleavened Bread 3391, 4521 let
every one1538 of you5216 lay5087 by3844 him1438 in store,2343 as3748, 302 God hath prospered2137 him,
that2443 there be1096 no3361 gatherings3048 when(3752) I come.2064
1Co 16:2 (Textus Receptus) κατα2596 PREP μιαν1520 A-ASF σαββατων4521 N-GPN εκαστος1538 A-NSM υμων5216 P-2GP παρ3844 PREP εαυτω1438 F-3DSM τιθετω5087 V-PAM-3S θησαυριζων2343 V-PAP-NSM ο3739 R-ASN τι5100 X-ASN αν302 PRT ευοδωται2137 V-PPS-3S ινα2443 CONJ μη3361 PRT-N οταν3752 CONJ ελθω2064 V-2AAS-1S τοτε5119 ADV λογιαι3048 N-NPF γινωνται1096 V-PNS-3P
1Co 16:2 KJV Upon the first2596, 3391 day of the week4521 let every one1538 of you5216 lay5087 by3844 him1438 in store,2343 as3748, 302 God hath prospered2137 him, that2443 there be1096 no3361 gatherings3048 when(3752) I come.2064
1Co 16:3 And when I come, whomsoever ye shall approve
by your letters, them will I send to bring your liberality unto
1Co 16:4 And if it be meet that I go also, they shall
go with me.
1Co 16:5 I will come unto you when I have passed through
1Co 16:6 And it may be that I will abide, yea,
and winter
with you, that ye may bring me on my journey whithersoever I go.
1Co 16:7 For I will not see you now by the way; but I trust
to tarry a while with you, if the Lord permit.
1Co 16:8 But I will tarry at
Notice
above (v. 8) that Paul’s plans were to arrive in
Notice
that Paul had plans possibly to “abide, yea, and winter with” the
Corinthians, i.e. through the winter 43/44 CE (1 Cor 16:6.)
Act 20:3 TLT+ But5037 after spending4160 three5140 months3376 there, when there began1096 against
him846 to be laid plans1917 under5259 the3588 Jews,2453 being at the point of3195 setting sail321 into1519
Act 20:3 Textus Receptus ποιησας4160 V-AAP-NSM τε5037 PRT μηνας3376 N-APM τρεις5140 A-APM γενομενης1096 V-2ADP-GSF αυτω846 P-DSM επιβουλης1917 N-GSF υπο5259 PREP των3588 T-GPM ιουδαιων2453 A-GPM μελλοντι3195 V-PAP-DSM αναγεσθαι321 V-PPN εις1519 PREP την3588 T-ASF συριαν4947 N-ASF εγενετο1096 V-2ADI-3S γνωμη1106 N-NSF του3588 T-GSM υποστρεφειν5290 V-PAN δια1223 PREP μακεδονιας3109 N-GSF
Act 20:3 KJV And5037 there abode4160 three5140 months.3376 And when(5259) the3588 Jews2453 laid wait for1917, 1096 him,846 as he was about3195 to sail321 into1519 Syria,4947 he purposed1096, 1106 to return5290 through1223 Macedonia.3109
Paul’s
intention of “setting sail321 into1519
Notice
that Paul originally had tentative plans for staying in
That
Paul’s stay in Corinth occurred during the months prior to the Scripture New Year, Tishri 22, i.e. the 22nd
day of the Seventh Month, finds scriptural support in the following statement
of Paul:
2Co 9:2 TLT+ For1063 I know1492 the3588 forwardness of
your mind,4288, 5216 for which3739 I boast2744 of5228 you5216 to them of
Macedonia,3110 that3754 Achaia882 was ready3903 before575 the beginning of this Scripture
year;4070 and2532, (1537) your5216 zeal2205 hath provoked2042 very many.4119
2Co 9:2 KJV For1063 I know1492 the3588 forwardness of your mind,4288, 5216 for which3739 I boast2744 of5228 you5216 to them of
2Co 9:2 Textus Receptus οιδα1492 V-RAI-1S γαρ1063 CONJ την3588 T-ASF προθυμιαν4288 N-ASF υμων5216 P-2GP ην3739 R-ASF υπερ5228 PREP υμων5216 P-2GP καυχωμαι2744 V-PNI-1S μακεδοσιν3110 N-DPM οτι3754 CONJ αχαια882 N-NSF παρεσκευασται3903 V-RPI-3S απο575 PREP περυσι4070 ADV και2532 CONJ ο3588 T-NSM
εξ1537 PREP
υμων5216 P-2GP ζηλος2205 N-NSM ηρεθισεν2042 V-AAI-3S τους3588 T-APM πλειονας4119 A-APM-C
Strong’s G575:
ἀπό, apo, apo', A primary
particle; “off”, that is, away (from something near), in various
senses (of place, time, or relation; literally or figuratively)
Strong’s G4070:
πέρυσι, perusi,
per'-oo-si, Adverb from G4009; the by gone, that is, (as
noun) last year
The
conclusion that Paul spent the winter in
Tit 3:12 When I shall
send Artemas unto thee, or Tychicus, be diligent to come unto me to Nicopolis: for I have determined there to
winter.
Notice
that Nicopolis is located in
Titus 3:15 KJV states:
“It
was written to Titus, ordained the first bishop of the church of the Cretians,
from
Nicopolis of Macedonia.”
Titus had time to receive and heed Paul’s request for
him to come to
2
Cor. 13:14 KJV “The second epistle to
the Corinthians was written from Philippi, a city of
Accordingly,
I have confirmed my conclusion above that Paul’s 2nd visit to
Notice that the same
Timotheus who was sent ahead of Paul to
1 Cor. 16:24 KJV The first epistle to the Corinthians was written from
Notice
also the presence of Sosthenes in
Act 18:17 Then all the Greeks
took Sosthenes, the chief ruler of the synagogue, and beat him
before the judgment seat. And Gallio cared for none of those things.
1Co 1:1 Paul called to be
an apostle of Jesus Christ through the will of God, and Sosthenes our
brother.
Interestingly,
in 1 Corinthians 9:6 Paul is giving reference to Barnabas even though we know
from Acts 15:36-41 that Paul and Barnabas parted ways some time [3 years; cf.
the dates for authorship
of 1 Corinthians as here provided, and for Paul’s
2nd visit to Jerusalem] prior to Paul’s first recorded visit to
Corinth as recorded in Acts 18:1. It appears to me from Galatians 2:13 and
Colossians 4:10 that there is more to the separation between Paul and Barnabas
than what is recorded in Acts 15:37-39. However, Colossians 4:10 and 1
Corinthians 9:6 is evidence to me that Paul was by no means holding a grudge
against Barnabas even though I find no record of the two of them ever being
together again following the event recorded in Acts 15:39.
What epistle is being referenced in 1
Corinthians 5:9
1Cor
5:9 KJV+
I wrote1125 unto you5213 in1722 an epistle1992 not3361 to company with4874 fornicators:4205
The Greek word “πορνοις4205” here
used is found 10 times in the New Testament:
1. 1 Cor. 5:9, 10, 11; 6:9;
Eph. 5:5; 1 Tim. 1:10; Hebr. 12:16; 13:4; Rev. 21:8; and 22:15.
In addition the following
related Greek words are also found in the New Testament:
2. “πορνεια(ς)4202” 26
times: Matt 5:32; 15:19; 19:9; Mark 7:21; John 8:41; Acts 15:20, 29; 21:25;
Rom. 1:29; 1 Cor. 5:1 twice; 6:13, 18; 7:2; 2 Cor. 12:21; Gal. 5:19; Eph. 5:3;
Col. 3:5; 1 Thess. 4:3; Rev. 2:21; 9:21; 14:8; 17:2, 4; 18:3; and 19:2.
3. “πορνευω(ν)4203” 8 times:
1 Cor. 6:18; 10:8 twice; Rev. 2:14, 20; 17:2; and 18:3, 9.
4. “πορναι4204” 12
times: Matt. 21:31, 32; Luke 15:30; 1 Cor. 6:15, 16; Hebr. 11:31; James 2:25; Rev.
17:1, 5, 15, 16; and 19:2.
Of these it is immediately
obvious that only the following need at all be considered as being referenced
in 1 Cor. 5:9:
1. Eph. 5:5; 1 Tim. 1:10;
Hebr. 12:16; 13:4;
2. Acts 15:20, 29; 21:25;
Rom. 1:29; 1 Cor. 5:1 twice; 6:13, 18; 7:2; 2 Cor. 12:21; Gal. 5:19; Eph. 5:3;
Col. 3:5; 1 Thess. 4:3;
3. None;
4. Hebr. 11:31; and James
2:25.
Based upon our prior findings re
time of authorship we may further exclude all but the following:
1. 1 Tim. 1:10;
2. Acts 15:20, 29; 21:25; 1
Cor. 5:1 twice; 1 Thess. 4:3;
3. None;
4. James 2:25.
We have found below that Timothy was almost certainly located in
In summary then, Paul’s
reference in 1 Cor. 5:9 to a prior epistle seems most likely to be pointing to
one of the following:
1. An epistle of Paul not
included in the New Testament;
2. A writing that issued
out of the event referenced in Acts 15:12-29; or possibly
3. 1 Corinthians 5:1.
Again,
Paul’s First Epistle to the Corinthians was
written within a few weeks prior to the Feast of Unleavened Bread that same
year, 43 CE.
Paul’s Second epistle to the Corinthians:
2
Corinthians, i.e….:
“The
second epistle to the Corinthians was written from Philippi, a city of
Since
Lucas, the author of Acts, was one among the travel companions of Paul when
traveling from Philippi to Jerusalem for the Pentecost meeting in Jerusalem in
44 CE (cf. Acts 20:6 “And we sailed…,”)
and based upon Paul’s claim that he had already visited Corinth twice – having
tentative, “if I come again,” plans to visit them for the third time - (cf. 2
Cor. 13:1-2,) I contend that most likely 2 Corinthians was written
while Paul was in Philippi after his return from Greece (Acts
20:2-3, 6,) probably between the 7th month, Tishri (1 or) 22, 43 CE
and Aviv 15, 44 CE [between
September 24, 43 CE and April 19, 44 CE.] (Cf. what’s been said about “wintering” and re Titus
under
the timing of 1
Cor. above and under the timing of
Titus below.)
Aside from Paul’s
tentative plans recorded in 2 Corinthians 13:1-2 I find no evidence that Paul
actually visited
On the other hand, why
would Paul need to go to
(Notice also that
Timothy, while being referenced as one of the two authors of 2 Corinthians (2
Cor. 1:1,) and though otherwise used by Paul as a scribe (writing 1 & 2
Thessalonians, 1 Corinthians, and Hebrews,) is not one of the scribes of 2
Corinthians! (Cf. 2 Cor. 13:14/subscript.))
Isn’t it quite likely
that someone, perhaps one of the brethren referenced in 2 Cor. 8:18, 22-23,
perhaps even Timothy? (cf. Acts 20:3,) was instrumental in bringing back the
gifts requested by Paul from the Corinthians unto the saints in
Notice also Paul’s
reference to “a year ago” in the following to passages:
2Co 8:10
KJV
And herein I give my advice: for this is expedient for you, who have begun
before, not only to do, but also to be forward a year ago.
2Co 9:2 KJV For I know the
forwardness of your mind, for which I boast of you to them of Macedonia, that
Achaia was ready a year ago; and your zeal hath provoked very many.
The Greek words translated
“a year ago,” “απο575 περυσι4070,” are used
only twice in the New Testament, i.e. in the above to texts only. The word “απο575” per
Strong’s G575 means ““off”, that is, away (from
something near), in various senses (of place, time, or relation; literally or
figuratively).” The word “περυσι4070” is derived “from the same as G4008; an extremity.” Thus an even more exact translation of the above two
texts is:
2Co 8:10 TLT+ And2532 herein1722, 5129 I give1325 my
advice:1106 for1063 this5124 is expedient4851 for you,5213 who3748 have begun before,4278 not3756 only3440 to do,4160 but235 also2532 to be forward2309 before575 the
beginning of this year.4070
2Co 9:2 TLT+ For1063 I know1492 the3588 forwardness of
your mind,4288, 5216 for which3739 I boast2744 of5228 you5216 to them of
Since
the civil year begins with Tishri (1 or) 22, I conclude that the above two
verses confirm that which has been said above about the timing of the
authorship of 2 Corinthians.
Paul’s (6) epistles written from
Philippians states:
Phi 4:23 KJV “It was written to the Philippians from
Phi 1:7 KJV+ Even as2531 it is2076 meet1342 for me1698 to think5426 this5124 of5228 you5216 all,3956 because I3165 have2192 you5209 in1722 my heart;2588 inasmuch as both5037 in1722 my3450 bonds,1199 and2532 in the3588 defense627 and2532 confirmation951 of the3588 gospel,2098 ye5209 all3956 are5607 partakers4791 of my3450 grace.5485
Phi
1:12 KJV But I would ye should understand, brethren,
that the things which happened unto me have fallen out rather unto the furtherance
of the gospel;
Phi 1:13 KJV+ So that5620 my3450 bonds1199 in1722 Christ5547 are1096 manifest5318 in1722 all3650 the3588 palace,4232 and2532 in all3956 other3062 places;
Phi 1:14 KJV+ And2532 many4119 of the3588 brethren80 in1722 the Lord,2962 waxing confident3982 by my3450 bonds,1199 are much more bold5111, 4056 to speak2980 the3588 word3056 without fear.870
Phi 1:16 KJV+ The one3588,
3303 preach2605 Christ5547 of1537 contention,2052 not3756 sincerely,55 supposing3633 to add2018 affliction2347 to my3450 bonds:1199
Phi 2:19 KJV But I
trust in the Lord Jesus to send Timotheus shortly unto you, that I also may
be of good comfort, when I know your state.
Phi 2:23 KJV Him
therefore I hope to send presently, so soon as I shall see how it will go
with me.
Phi 2:24 KJV But I
trust in the Lord that I also myself shall come shortly.
Phi 2:25 KJV Yet I
supposed it necessary to send to you Epaphroditus, my brother, and
companion in labour, and fellowsoldier, but your messenger, and he that
ministered to my wants.
Phi 2:28 KJV I
sent him therefore the more carefully, that, when ye see him again, ye may
rejoice, and that I may be the less sorrowful.
Phi 2:29 KJV Receive
him therefore in the Lord with all gladness; and hold such in reputation:
Ephesians states:
Eph 6:24 KJV “Written from
An apparent time reference (Eph 3:3-4) referring back to
a prior (Eph. 1:9) writing within the same epistle:
Eph 1:9 Having made known1107 unto us2254 the3588 mystery3466 of his848 will,2307 according2596 to his848 good pleasure2107 which3739 he hath purposed4388 in1722 himself:848
Eph 3:3 KJV+ How that3754 by2596 revelation602 he made known1107 unto me3427 the3588 mystery;3466 (as2531 I wrote afore4270 in1722 few words,3641
Eph 3:4 KJV+ Whereby,4314, 3739 when ye read,314 ye may1410 understand3539 my3450 knowledge4907 in1722 the3588 mystery3466 of Christ)5547
Eph 6:20 KJV For which I am an ambassador in
bonds: that therein I may speak boldly, as I ought to speak.
Eph 6:21 KJV+ But1161 that2443 ye5210 also2532 may know1492 my affairs,2596,
1691 and
how5101 I do,4238 Tychicus,5190 a beloved27 brother80 and2532 faithful4103 minister1249 in1722 the Lord,2962 shall make known1107 to you5213 all things:3956
Colossians states:
Col
4:8 KJV Whom3739 I have sent3992 unto4314 you5209 for1519 the same purpose,846, 5124 that2443 he might know1097 your estate,4012, 5216 and2532 comfort3870 your5216 hearts;2588
Col 4:9 KJV With4862 Onesimus,3682 a faithful4103 and2532 beloved27 brother,80 who3739 is2076 one of1537 you.5216 They shall make known1107 unto you5213 all things3956 which are done here.5602
Col
4:14 KJV Luke,3065 the3588 beloved27 physician,2395 and2532 Demas,1214 greet782 you.5209
Col
4:15 KJV Salute782 the3588 brethren80 which are in1722 Laodicea,2993 and2532 Nymphas,3564 and2532 the3588 church1577 which is in2596 his846 house.3624
Philemon states:
Philemon 1:25 KJV “Written from
Phm 1:1 KJV+ Paul,3972 a prisoner1198 of Jesus2424 Christ,5547 and2532 Timothy5095 our brother,80 unto Philemon5371 our dearly beloved,27 and2532 fellow laborer,4904
Phm 1:2 KJV And to our beloved Apphia, and Archippus our fellow soldier, and to
the church in thy house:
Phm 1:10 KJV+ I beseech3870 thee4571 for4012 my1699 son5043 Onesimus,3682 whom3739 I have begotten1080 in1722 my3450 bonds:1199
Phm
1:11 KJV+ Which3588 in time past4218 was to thee4671 unprofitable,890 but1161 now3570 profitable2173 to thee4671 and2532 to me:1698
Phm 1:12 KJV+ Whom3739 I have sent
again:375 thou4771 therefore1161 receive4355 him,846 that is,5123 mine own1699 bowels:4698
Phm
1:13 KJV+ Whom3739 I1473 would1014 have retained2722 with4314 me,1683 that2443 in thy stead5228, 4675 he might have ministered unto1247 me3427 in1722 the3588 bonds1199 of the3588 gospel:2098
Phm
1:22 KJV But withal prepare me also a lodging: for I trust that through your prayers I
shall be given unto you.
Phm 1:23 KJV+ There salute782 thee4571 Epaphras,1889 my3450 fellow prisoner4869 in1722 Christ5547 Jesus;2424
2 Timothy states:
2Ti 4:22
KJV “The second epistle unto Timotheus,
ordained the first bishop of the church of the Ephesians, was written from
2Ti 4:10 For Demas
hath forsaken me [cf. Col. 4:14 & Philemon 1:24,] having loved this present
world, and is departed unto Thessalonica; Crescens to
2Ti 4:11 Only
Luke is with me. Take Mark, and bring him with thee: for he is profitable
to me for the ministry.
Is Luke the scribe of 2 Timothy?
–
Notice that Luke is never named as the sole scribe in any of the subscripts to
Paul’s epistles! Could this be a characteristic peculiarity of Luke, i.e. not
naming himself in a subscript written by him, (cf. Gal. 6:18) and perhaps also
evidence of each subscript being an entry made by the scribe of each respective
epistle?
2Ti 4:12 KJV+ And1161 Tychicus5190 have I sent649 to1519 Ephesus.2181
2Ti 4:13 KJV The cloak that I left at
–
What is more natural than for Paul to think of his warm cloak as the nights of
fall begin to get cool?! Cf. also 2 Timothy 4:21 below!
2Ti
1:16 KJV The Lord give mercy unto the house of Onesiphorus; for he oft refreshed me,
and was not ashamed of my chain:
2Ti 1:17 KJV But, when he [Onesiphorus] was in
2Ti 4:21 KJV Do thy
diligence to come before winter.
Galatians states:
Gal 6:18 KJV “Unto the Galatians written from
Is Luke the scribe of Paul’s epistle to the Galatians?
Cf. the
note under 2 Tim 4:11!
Or was Paul his own scribe when writing Galatians?
Consider
these words of Paul ! :
Gal 6:11 Ye see1492 how large4080 a letter1121 I have
written1125 unto you5213 with mine own1699 hand.5495
G1121
γράμμα gramma gram'-mah
From G1125; a writing, that is, a letter, note, epistle,
book, etc.; plural learning: - bill, learning, letter, scripture,
writing, written.
Notice once again 2 Tim.
4:11 ! Isn’t it quite likely that a
main reason for Paul’s need of Mark and Timothy is his need for someone who can
read and write for him ? (It
appears as though Paul had a diffraction problem and that no glasses were
available at the time to correct his problem.)
Gal 5:1 KJV+ Stand fast4739 therefore3767 in the3588 liberty1657 wherewith3739 Christ5547 hath made us free,1659, 2248 and2532 be not3361 entangled again with1758, 3825 the yoke2218 of bondage.1397
Considerations
re the relative order of authorship of Paul’s epistles written from
Notice that by the time 2
Timothy is being written Tychicus had already been sent to
Notice also that by the
time 2 Timothy was being written Demas had left Paul and “departed unto
Thessalonica” (2 Tim. 4:10,) whereas when Colossians and Philemon were being
written Demas was still with Paul (Col. 4:14 & Philemon 1:24.) Accordingly, both
Colossians and Philemon were written before 2 Timothy.
Likewise, when Colossians
and Philemon were being written Mark was still with Paul in Rome (Col. 4:10
& Philemon 1:24) and tentative plans were being made for Mark to travel to
Colosse (cf. Col. 4:10,) but by the time 2 Timothy was being written Paul was
requesting Timothy to “Take Mark, and bring him with thee: for he is profitable
to me for the ministry” (2 Tim. 4:11.) Accordingly it appears as though Mark
left
Noticing also that
Onesimus is not mentioned with Tychicus as having been sent to Ephesus (2 Tim.
4:12,) while Onesimus, and not Tychicus, is similarly named (Philemon 1:10, 12)
in Paul’s epistle to Philemon (who apparently lived in either Colosse or
Laodicea (cf. Philemon 1:2 and Col. 4:17 re Archippus)) I conclude that
Tychicus and Onesimus were sent separately, Tychicus to Ephesus and Onesimus to
Philemon in either Colosse or Laodicea. Possibly Paul’s intention was for
Tychicus and Onesimus eventually to reunite in Colosse or else Paul’s initial
plans were modified from his original intention (cf. Col. 4:7, 9 ?)
Additionally I notice that
while Colossians is written by Tychicus and Onesimus jointly, Philemon is noted
as written by Onesimus alone. Accordingly, I find it quite possible that
Tychicus left Paul before Onesimus did and that, if so, Colossians was probably written
before Philemon was written.
Furthermore, from Paul’s
request in 2 Timothy 4:21, “Do thy diligence to come before
winter,” it appears as though 2
Timothy was most likely written sometime in the fall, before winter.
Was Paul released from being a prisoner
of
Notice
also that by the time Philemon 1:22 was written Paul was expecting to be
released from his bonds in
Likewise,
it may be noted that Colossians is using words to the effect that the first
part of Colossians may have been written prior to Paul’s release while the last
part (at least from Col. 4:10 onwards) may have been written after Paul’s
release as a Roman prisoner:
G4889 σύνδουλος sundoulos soon'-doo-los
From
G4862 and G1401; a co-slave, that is, servitor or ministrant
of the same master (human or divine): -
fellowservant.
G1401 δοῦλος
doulos doo'-los
From G1210;
a slave (literally or figuratively, involuntarily or voluntarily;
frequently therefore in a qualified sense of subjection or subserviency)
G4869 συναιχμάλωτος sunaichmalōtos soon-aheekh-mal'-o-tos
From G4862
and G164; a co-captive
G164 αἰχμαλωτός
aichmalōtos
aheekh-mal-o-tos'
Fromαἰχμή aichmē
(a spear) and a derivative of the same as G259; properly a prisoner
of war, that is, (generally) a captive
Notice
the change in reference to Epaphras: First Epaphras is referenced as “a fellow
servant,” (or “fellow slave” or “fellow subject”) while later he
is referenced as being merely “a servant…,” and not “a fellow servant.” Could
it be that this change in language is an indication that Paul had received news
of having been released from Roman bondage in the interim, i.e. after the
first, but before the last, part of Colossians was written, and while Epaphras
was not yet released? Notice also that in Col. 4:10 a different Greek word is
being used, a word which is not being
used by Paul in reference to anyone whom we have any certain record of
having been at the time a prisoner of
Notice
that the language used in Gal. 5:1 is in fact a rather strong hint that Paul
was, at the time when Galatians was being written, already finally released
from being a prisoner of Rome!:
Gal 5:1 KJV+ Stand fast4739 therefore3767 in the3588 liberty1657 wherewith3739 Christ5547 hath made us free,1659, 2248 and2532 be not3361 entangled again with1758, 3825 the yoke2218 of bondage.1397
Notice
also that the general subject matter of Galatians has much to do with the
status of the statutes of various States, specifically (in the context of
Galatians,) the statutes of the Roman Empire, relative to man as a true
sovereign under none but “him that made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and the
fountains of waters” (Rev. 14:7.) I.e. in contradistinction to such as are
still volunteering as subjects of such States.
True, this same situation would pertain likewise also to the State of
Israel while under Moses (cf. Deut. 5:3-5!) or under any other king (cf. 1
Sam. 8,) and thus, in that sense it is true that Paul’s epistle to the
Galatians is dealing with the traditional Jewish sacrifices and ordinances,
while not however ever touching upon any of the original laws and ordinances
given by the Creator Himself. Consider also, if you will, carefully and in this
context, the following passages:
This same covenant was renewed to Abraham
in the promise, "In thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be
blessed." Genesis 22:18. This promise pointed to Christ. So Abraham understood
it (see Galatians 3:8, 16), and he trusted in Christ for the forgiveness of
sins. It was this faith that was accounted unto him for righteousness. The covenant with Abraham also maintained
the authority of God's law. The Lord appeared unto Abraham, and said,
"I am the Almighty God; walk before Me, and be thou perfect." Genesis
17:1. The testimony of God concerning His faithful servant was, "Abraham obeyed My voice, and kept My
charge, My commandments, My statutes, and My laws." Genesis 26:5. And the
Lord declared to him, "I will
establish My covenant between Me and thee and thy seed after thee in their
generations, for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee and to thy
seed after thee." Genesis 17:7.
Though this covenant was made with Adam
and renewed to Abraham, it could not be ratified until the death of Christ [Consider in this context carefully the
meaning of the words “death,” “Christ,” and then “Jesus!”] It had existed
by the promise of God since the first intimation of redemption had been given;
it had been accepted by faith; yet when ratified by Christ, it is called a new
covenant. The law of God was the basis of this covenant, which was simply an
arrangement for bringing men again into harmony with the divine will, placing them
where they could obey God's law. {White,
Ellen G., Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 370:3-4, emphasis and square bracketed
comments added throughout.}
But there
is a law which was abolished, which Christ "took out of the way, nailing
it to his cross." Paul calls it "the law of commandments contained in
ordinances." This ceremonial
law, given by God through Moses, with its sacrifices and ordinances, was to be binding upon the Hebrews until type met antitype [that is, until a more correct understanding was being perceived]
in the death of Christ as the Lamb of God to take away the sin of the world.
Then all the sacrificial offerings and services were to be abolished. Paul and
the other apostles labored to show this, and resolutely withstood those
Judaizing teachers who declared that Christians should observe the ceremonial
law. {White, Ellen G., an article in
Signs of the Times, September 4, 1884, par. 3}
…John was sent in the spirit and power
of Elijah to prepare the way of Jesus. Those who rejected the testimony of John
were not benefited by the teachings of Jesus. Their opposition to the message
that foretold His coming placed them where they could not readily receive the
strongest evidence that He was the Messiah. Satan led on those who rejected the
message of John to go still farther, to reject and crucify Christ. In doing
this they placed themselves where they could not receive the blessing on the
day of Pentecost, which would have taught them the way into the heavenly
sanctuary. The rending of the veil of
the temple showed that the Jewish sacrifices and ordinances would no longer be
received. The great Sacrifice had been offered and had been accepted, and
the Holy Spirit which descended on the day of Pentecost carried the minds of the
disciples from the earthly sanctuary to the heavenly, where Jesus had entered
by His own blood, to shed upon His disciples the benefits of His atonement. But
the Jews were left in total darkness. They lost all the light which they might
have had upon the plan of salvation, and still trusted in their useless
sacrifices and offerings. The heavenly sanctuary had taken the place of the
earthly, yet they had no knowledge of the change. Therefore they could not be
benefited by the mediation of Christ in the holy place. {White, Ellen G., Early Writings, p. 259:1,
emphasis added.}
The people whom God had called to be the
pillar and ground of the truth had become representatives of Satan. They were
doing the work that he desired them to do, taking a course to misrepresent the
character of God, and cause the world to look upon Him as a tyrant. The very
priests who ministered in the temple had lost sight of the significance of the
service they performed. They had ceased to look beyond the symbol to the thing
signified. In presenting the sacrificial offerings they were as actors in a
play. The ordinances which God Himself
had appointed were made the means of blinding the mind and hardening the heart.
God could do no more for man through these channels. The whole system must be swept away. {White, Ellen G., Desire of Ages, p. 36:2,
emphasis added.}
Among those
to whom this message to the church in
We are in danger of falling into similar
errors. Never should that which God has not given as a test be carried as was
the subject of the law in Galatians. I have been instructed that the terrible
experience at the Minneapolis Conference is one of the saddest chapters in the
history of the believers in present truth. God forbids that the subject of the two laws should ever
again be agitated as it then was.
Some are not yet healed of their defection and would plunge into this subject
once more. Should they do this, differences of opinion would again create
division. This question must not be revived.
{White, Ellen G., The Ellen G. White 1888 Materials (1987), Chapter 211
– To. C. P. Bollman, p. 1795:3 and 1796:1, emphasis added.}
Then I was pointed back to the time that
Jesus took His disciples away alone, into an upper room, and first washed their
feet, and then gave them to eat of the broken bread, to represent His broken
body, and juice of the vine to represent His spilled blood. I saw that all should move understandingly, and
follow the example of Jesus in these things, and when attending to these ordinances, should be as separate from
unbelievers as possible. {White,
Arthur L., Ellen G. White: The Early Years Volume 1 - 1827-1862, (1985,) p.
189:3.}
Notice
that in Philippians Paul is consistently using, in referencing his status as
being either in bonds or in imprisonment, only the Greek word defined in
Strong’s G1199 (translated “my bonds.”) To me this is an indication that Paul’s
Epistle to the Philippians was written before Paul was released from being a
Roman prisoner.
Paul’s
status as a prisoner of Rome at that time is also clearly consistent with his
words as follows, most especially as seen in verses 23-24:
Phi 2:19 KJV But I
trust in the Lord Jesus to send Timotheus shortly unto you, that I also may
be of good comfort, when I know your state.
Phi 2:23 KJV Him
therefore I hope to send presently, so soon as I shall see how it will go
with me.
Phi 2:24 KJV But I
trust in the Lord that I also myself shall come shortly.
Phi 2:25 KJV Yet I
supposed it necessary to send to you Epaphroditus, my brother, and
companion in labour, and fellowsoldier, but your messenger, and he that
ministered to my wants.
Phi 2:28 KJV I
sent him therefore the more carefully, that, when ye see him again, ye may
rejoice, and that I may be the less sorrowful.
Phi 2:29 KJV Receive
him therefore in the Lord with all gladness; and hold such in reputation:
Nevertheless,
considering Paul’s experiences while in Philippi, as recorded in Acts 16:12-40,
it makes sense also, for us as well as for the Philippians, to be reminded of
Paul’s bonds while in the
In conclusion re the epistles written
from
Per
the above I conclude that Paul’s (6) epistles to the Philippians, Ephesians,
Colossians, Philemon, 2
Timothy, and (probably last and after Paul’s release) Galatians, were all written
(most likely in that order considering the scribes involved in writing each
epistle and the development re Paul’s bonds and release) during the summer 45
CE, most likely some time between Tammuz 16 [Monday night, July 19, or Tuesday,
July 20, 45 CE] and Tishri 22, 45 CE [October 22, 45 CE.] Obviously Paul had some time on his hands while spending
time as a prisoner in
Additional notes re 2 Timothy and
Ephesians:
Re Paul’s epistle 2 Timothy:
2Ti 4:22
KJV “The second epistle unto
Timotheus, ordained the first bishop of the church of the Ephesians, was
written from
2Ti 4:10 For Demas
hath forsaken me [cf. Col. 4:14 & Philemon 1:24,] having loved this
present world, and is departed unto Thessalonica; Crescens to
2Ti 4:11 Only
Luke is with me. Take Mark, and bring him with thee: for he is profitable
to me for the ministry.
Is Luke the scribe of 2 Timothy?
–
Notice that Luke is never named as the sole scribe in any of the subscripts to
Paul’s epistles! Could this be a characteristic peculiarity of Luke, i.e. not
naming himself in a subscript written by him, (cf. Gal. 6:18) and perhaps also
evidence of each subscript being an entry made by the scribe of each respective
epistle?
2Ti 4:12 KJV+ And1161 Tychicus5190 have I sent649 to1519 Ephesus.2181
2Ti 4:13 KJV The cloak that I left at
2Ti
1:16 KJV The Lord give mercy unto the house of Onesiphorus; for he oft refreshed me,
and was not ashamed of my chain:
2Ti 1:17 KJV But, when he [Onesiphorus] was in
2Ti 4:21 KJV Do thy
diligence to come before winter.
From
the above considerations it seems clear that 2 Timothy was written towards the
end of Paul’s sojourn in
The
subscript found in 2 Tim 4:22 provides for us an important event, “Paul… before
Nero the second time,” that is thus being closely timed by these same
considerations.
Accordingly,
2
Timothy was written most likely in the Sixth Moon, 45 CE [September, 45 CE.]
Re Ephesians:
2Ti 4:12 KJV+ And1161 Tychicus5190 have I sent649 to1519 Ephesus.2181
It
makes sense that Paul’s epistle to the Ephesians would have been sent with
Tychicus when he traveled to
Phi 4:23 KJV “It was written to the Philippians from
Eph 6:24 KJV “Written from
Philemon 1:25 KJV “Written from
2Ti 4:12 KJV+ And1161 Tychicus5190 have I sent649 to1519 Ephesus.2181
Obviously
Tychicus would not be the scribe writing epistles for Paul while he was not in
Paul’s presence, would he? Also it makes a lot of sense to me for Paul to send
an epistle to
Based
on the above I find that Paul’s epistle to the Ephesians was most
likely written in the first half of the time span defined above [Tammuz 16 [Monday night,
July 19, or Tuesday, July 20, 45 CE] and Tishri 22, 45 CE [October 22, 45 CE,]
] i.e. most likely in the Fifth Moon, the month Av, 45 CE.
Hebrews 13:25 KJV states:
“Written to the Hebrews from
Heb 10:34 For ye had compassion of me in my bonds, and
took joyfully the spoiling of your goods, knowing in yourselves that ye have in
heaven a better and an enduring substance.
Heb 13:3 Remember them that are in bonds, as bound with
them; and them which suffer adversity, as being yourselves also
in the body.
Considering:
1.
The words “from
2.
The fact that Timothy had had time to
arrive (from, or via,
3.
The fact that in Hebrews 10:34 Paul is
using past tense when stating “ye had compassion of me in my bonds”
4.
The fact that in Hebrews 13:3 Paul is
using third person when referencing “them that are in bonds,”
…Hebrews
was probably written from somewhere else in
As
to the latest date before which Hebrews is most likely written, please consider
these thoughts!:
“…In fact, there are evidences that suggest that the
epistle was written before the
destruction of the
Considering
that the
Temple in Jerusalem was ignited and burnt on the Third Day of the week Av
13, 54 CE [Tuesday August 6, 54 CE,] said date may also be considered a fairly
firm latter boundary for the authorship of Paul’s Epistle to the Hebrews, may
it not? Accordingly, Hebrews was probably written from somewhere
in Italy outside of Rome some time subsequent to Paul’s release from his
“bonds” at the beginning of the Scripture year
beginning Tishri 22, 45 CE, (later than the six epistles that were “written
from Rome” in the summer of 45 CE,) and some time prior to the beginning of the
Scripture year beginning Tishri 22, 54 CE.
Paul’s
epistles to the Thessalonians:
Considering…
2
Thessalonians 3:10:
“For
even when we were with you…”,
i.e.
no reference to more than one prior visit with the Thessalonians,
1
Thessalonians 1:1 KJV states:
“Paul
and Silvanus, and Timotheus, unto the church of the
Thessalonians….”
2
Thessalonians 1:1 KJV states:
“Paul
and Silvanus, and Timotheus, unto the church of the
Thessalonians….”
Acts 17:14 KJV states:
“And
then immediately the brethren sent away Paul to go as it were to the sea: but Silas and Timotheus abode there still.”
Acts
18:5 KJV states:
“And
when Silas and Timotheus were come from
and,
while assuming that Silvanus and Silas are one and the same since these names
are never used together nor by the same scribe, that Silas is the only one
named in Acts (13 times,) and that Silvanus is the only one named in the
epistles (4 times:)
1
Thessalonians 5:28 KJV states:
“The
first epistle unto the Thessalonians was written from
2
Thessalonians 3:18 KJV states:
“The
second epistle to the Thessalonians was written from
I notice also the
events and sufferings of Paul in
1Th 2:2 But even after that we had suffered before,
and were shamefully entreated, as ye know, at
- - - - -
Act 16:12 And from thence to Philippi, which is the
chief city of that part of
Act 16:37 But Paul said unto them, They have beaten us
openly uncondemned, being Romans, and have cast [us] into prison; and now do
they thrust us out privily? nay verily; but let them come themselves and fetch
us out.
Paul’s experiences at Thessalonica are recorded in
Acts 17:1-10 and also in Philippians 4:16.
According to
the subscripts both epistles to the Thessalonians were written from
1Th 3:1 KJV+ Wherefore1352 when we could no longer3371 forbear,4722 we thought it good2106 to be left2641 at1722 Athens116 alone;3441
or
1Th 3:1 TLT+
Wherefore1352
when we could no longer3371 forbear,4722 we thought it good2106 for me to leave for2641 a stay at1722 Athens116 alone;3441
Per the Acts
17:14 “Silas and Timotheus abode there [in
1Th 3:2 And sent Timotheus, our brother, and minister
of God, and our fellowlabourer in the gospel of Christ, to establish you [the
Thessalonians,] and to comfort you concerning your faith:
1 Thessalonians 1:7 gives reference to Achaia. Per the
within chronology findings this is the earliest reference to Achaia within the
New Testament:
1Th 1:7 So that ye were ensamples to all that believe
in
Because
I find it most likely, considering also the proximity
in time between Paul’s visit to the Thessalonians and his stay in
The
epistles of Paul yet to be dated are 1 Timothy and Titus:
Paul’s 1st epistle to Timothy:
What’s the timing of the event being referenced in 1
Timothy 1:3?
1Ti 1:3 KJV+ As2531 I besought3870 thee4571 to abide still4357 at1722
After carefully reading Paul’s First Epistle to
Timothy I find no evidence but that Timothy was still located in
In 1 Timothy 1:3 Paul is apparently giving reference
to a prior event. It might seem tempting to attribute the timing of this event
to the events referenced in Acts 20:2 considering that Paul had then been
spending considerable time in
Neither does it seem as though Paul is referencing the
events recorded in Acts 18:18-19 where Paul was heading for
The only prior occasion when Paul left
It is interesting to notice that in Acts 16:1-8 Paul’s
traveling party is referenced by the words ‘he’ (verse 1,) ‘they’ (verse
4,6,7,8,) and ‘them’ (verse 7.) Presumably these words ‘they’ and ‘them’ are
here giving reference to Paul and Timothy. However, in Acts 16:10-17 these
pronouns are exchanged for ‘we’ and ‘us,’ thus apparently giving reference to
Paul and Luke, the author of Acts. In Acts 16:17 KJV provides “we and us” thus
giving reference also to at least one other, namely Silas who is named in verse
19. The absence of Timothy’s name being mentioned in connection with the events
referenced in Acts 16:19-17:13 is conspicuous evidence that Timothy was at that
time elsewhere, especially considering that Silas is in this passage named five
times, while Silas is also the only one there named as being with Paul.
Apparently, Timothy rejoined Paul’s party in
However, if this scenario is true, then Timothy must
either have returned to
When, and
from where, was 1 Timothy written?
1
Timothy 6:21 “The first to Timothy was written from
Phrygia
is only mentioned twice in the New Testament subsequent to the time of Paul’s
conversion upon the road to
Act 16:6 Now when they
had gone throughout Phrygia and the
region of
Act 18:23 And after he
had spent some time there, he departed, and went over all
the country of
Obviously 1 Timothy was not written at the time of the
event recorded in Acts 16:6 since at that time Paul and Timothy were together.
Consequently Acts 18:23 is the only recorded option left for us to consider.
From the following passages it is clear that Timothy is not named, and is not
likely in Paul presence, from some time following the event recorded in Acts
18:5, through Paul’s return to Phrygia per Acts 18:23, and until Paul’s arrival
in Ephesus per Acts 19:1:
Act 18:5 And when Silas
and Timothy were come from
…
Act 18:18 And Paul after this
tarried there yet a good while, and then took his leave of the brethren, and sailed thence into Syria, and with him Priscilla and Aquila; having
shorn his head in Cenchrea: for he had a vow.
Act 18:19 And he came to
Indeed, Timothy is not again named until Acts 19:22 at
which time Paul is sending Timothy and Erastus from
Accordingly, I find that most likely 1 Timothy
was written from Laodicea after Paul’s traveling by foot from Jerusalem
and Antioch (Acts 18:22) “over all the country of Galatia and Phrygia…” (Acts
18:23) and before he “came to
Background re Paul’s relationship to Titus: Based upon a
search for all instances of ‘Titus’ in the New Testament I find that the first
reference in time to Titus is that found in Galatians 2:1-3 [referencing Paul’s
2nd visit to Jerusalem in the year beginning Tishri (1 or) 22, 39
CE,] while the last referenced event re Titus is found in 2 Timothy 4:10
(referencing Titus having left for Dalmatia at the time of Paul’s detainment in
Rome; cf. the timing of
Paul’s visits at Jerusalem prior to his
leaving for Rome.)
When, and from where, was Paul’s epistle to Titus
written?
Titus 3:15 KJV
states:
“It was written to Titus, ordained the first bishop of
the church of the Cretians, from Nicopolis of
Tit 3:12 KJV When I shall
send Artemas unto thee, or Tychicus, be diligent to come unto me to Nicopolis: for I have determined there to winter.
Tit 3:13 KJV Bring
Zenas the lawyer and Apollos on their journey diligently,
that nothing be wanting unto them.
1Co
16:12 KJV As touching our brother Apollos,
I greatly desired him to come unto you with the brethren: but his
will was not at all to come at this time; but he will come when he
shall have convenient time.
2Co 2:12 KJV Furthermore,
when I came to
2Co 2:13 KJV I had no rest in my spirit, because I
found not Titus my brother: but taking my leave of them, I
went from thence into
2Co 7:5 KJV For, when we were come into
2Co 7:6 KJV Nevertheless
God, that comforteth those that are cast down, comforted us by the
coming of Titus;
2 Cor. 13:14 KJV “The second
epistle to the Corinthians was written from Philippi, a city of Macedonia, by
Titus
and Lucas.”
Paul is recording
(2 Cor. 2:13 and 7:5-6) retrospectively Titus’ arrival into
1Co
16:12 As touching our brother Apollos,
I greatly desired him to come unto you with the brethren: but his
will was not at all to come at this time; but he will
come when he shall have convenient time.
The above passage (1 Cor 16:12) in comparison to the
passage below…
Tit
3:13 Bring Zenas the lawyer and
Apollos
on their journey diligently, that nothing be wanting unto them.
…tells me that the epistle to Titus was written prior to the
time when 1 Corinthians was written. But Paul’s First Epistle to the
Corinthians was written within a few weeks prior to the
Feast of Unleavened Bread in 43 CE, i.e. in Nero’s 4th civil year of reign.
Adding to the above the record re the beginnings of
Apollos as a disciple (Acts 18:24-19:1,) and more, I find that the epistle to
Titus must have been written:
1.
after
the events recorded in Acts 18:18-28 (i.e. after Paul’s 3rd visit to
2.
after Paul
arrived at “
3.
after “having
passed through the upper coasts [and having] came to
4.
after the Third Month referenced in Acts 19:8 (i.e. after Sivan 41 CE,)
5.
after the
events in
6.
after
the events in
But…
Tit 3:12 When I shall
send Artemas unto thee, or Tychicus, be diligent to come unto me to Nicopolis:
for I
have determined there to winter.
… tells me that Titus was written in the summer or
fall and before the winter of whichever year.
However, considering the above findings:
1.
That
Titus was written prior to the Feast of Unleavened Bread in 43 CE, and
2.
That
Titus was written after Tishri (1 or) 22, 42 CE, and
3.
That
Titus was written before the winter,
I find that Titus was written in the fall of 42 CE after
Tishri (1 or) 22, 42 CE.
Summary
and conclusion re when Paul’s epistle to Titus was written:
At the time of
writing the Epistle to Titus Paul had decided to stay over the winter in
Nicopolis. But the Epistle to Titus was written prior to the time when 1
Corinthians was authored, and 1 Corinthians was written within a few weeks prior to the
Feast of Unleavened Bread in 43 CE. Because 1
Corinthians was written prior to Aviv 43 CE and after the end of Nero’s 3rd
year of reign (i.e. after the beginning of Tishri (1 or) 22, 42 CE,) I may then
conclude that Paul’s Epistle to Titus was written in the fall 42 CE after Tishri (1
or) 22, 42 CE and thus also prior to the winter 42/43 CE.
Conclusion
re the timing and duration of Paul’s sojourn in
Also - and very
importantly for the purpose of determining the Apostolic Church Meeting in
Jerusalem (as to whether it occurred in 43 CE or 44 CE) - it may then be
concluded that Paul was in Nicopolis, Macedonia, prior to the winter that
preceded his, Paul’s, 2nd visit at Corinth. But Paul’s 2nd
visit to
This fact is very
important to recognize for a correct understanding of the reference to “the
space of three years” (Acts 20:31, KJV,) which translation is not in accord
with the facts, albeit not grammatically incorrect. In order for a translation
to be both linguistically and de facto correct it is necessary to recognize
that Acts 20:31 is referencing Nero’s 3rd year of reign, not a three
year duration. But, if Paul had been in Macedonia for any part of Nero’s 3rd
year then Paul can hardly later reference that 3rd civil year of
Nero’s reign in terms such as: “[During Nero’s 3rd year of reign] I [Paul]
ceased not to warn every one [in Ephesus] night and day with tears”
(Acts 20:31,) can he? I find no reason to believe he did, do you?!
Accordingly, Paul
“departed for to go into
Timing the epistles of Peter, James, John, and (later) Jude:
Considering that Silvanus is the same as Silas and the
following passages re him:
Act 15:7 KJV And
when there had been much disputing, Peter rose up, and said unto them,
Act 15:22 KJV “Then pleased
it the apostles and elders, with the whole church, to send chosen men of their own company to
Act 15:32 KJV And Judas and Silas, being prophets also themselves, exhorted the brethren with
many words, and confirmed them.
Act 15:33 KJV And after they had tarried there a space, they were let go in
peace from the brethren unto the apostles.
Act 15:34 KJV Notwithstanding it pleased Silas to abide
there still.
Act
15:40 KJV And Paul
chose Silas, and departed, being recommended by the brethren unto the grace
of God.
1Pe 5:12 KJV By Silvanus, a faithful brother unto you,
as I suppose, I have written briefly, exhorting, and testifying that this is
the true grace of God wherein ye stand.
I find:
1. That
Silas/Silvanus was Peter’s scribe while they were both yet together in
2. that
the first time Silas/Silvanus is mentioned in association with Paul is during
Paul’s 2nd visit to
Accordingly,
and particularly considering 1 Peter 5:12, I find that 1 Peter was written at
about the time of the events recorded in Acts 15:1-30 in accord with Acts
15:23:
Act
15:23
And they wrote letters by them after
this manner; The apostles and elders and brethren send
greeting unto the brethren which are of the Gentiles in Antioch and Syria and
Cilicia.
i.e.
at
the time of Paul’s 2nd visit to Jerusalem, most likely in
connection with one of the three biblical feasts in Jerusalem and in the Scripture
year beginning Tishri 22, 39 CE.
Again
considering Acts 15:23 (quoted above) and the words “they wrote letters” I
find that…
Act 15:13 And after they had held their peace, James answered, saying, Men and
brethren, hearken unto me:
…the
presence of James, and …
Act 15:22 “Then pleased it the apostles
and elders, with the whole church, to send chosen men of their own company to
…Judas
on the same occasion as above quoted, and considering also the close
cooperation since long past between Peter and John…
Act 3:1 Now Peter
and John went up together into the temple at the hour of prayer, being the ninth hour.
Act 3:3 Who seeing Peter and John about to go into the temple asked an alms.
Act 3:4 And Peter,
fastening his eyes upon him with John,
said, Look on us.
Act 3:11 And as the lame man which was healed held Peter and John, all the people ran
together unto them in the porch that is called Solomon's, greatly wondering.
Act 4:13 Now when they saw the boldness of Peter and John, and perceived that they
were unlearned and ignorant men, they marveled; and they took knowledge of
them, that they had been with Jesus.
Act 4:19 But Peter
and John answered and said unto
them, Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than
unto God, judge ye.
Act 8:14 Now when the apostles which were at
Act 13:5 And when they
were at
Act 13:13 Now when Paul and his company
loosed from Paphos, they came to Perga in Pamphylia: and John departing from them
returned to
…I find that James, 1 Peter, and 1 John were all most
likely written at the same occasion, i.e. at the time of Paul’s 2nd
visit to Jerusalem, most likely
in connection with one of the three biblical feasts in Jerusalem and in
the Scripture year beginning Tishri 22,
39 CE.
The timing
of the Epistle of Jude
The fact that Judas was sent along in person with Paul
and Silas, however, would obviate the need for a letter from him, Judas, at
that time, would it not?, i.e.:
Act 15:22 “Then pleased it the apostles
and elders, with the whole church, to
send chosen men of their own company to
Perhaps this same reason is also why there is no
Epistle of Silas, or is there? At any rate, it appears, from the fact that the Eastern
Church includes in the NT canon only 22 books and epistles (2 Peter, 2&3
John, Jude, and Revelation being excluded,) that the Epistle of Jude was written
at a time subsequent to Tishri 22, 45
CE when all said 22 books and epistles were written, i.e. including Hebrews (the
last written epistle of Paul,) the gospels, and Acts.
Confirmation re the date of authorship of James, 1
Peter, and 1 John, but not Jude, is found also in the following passage. Notice
the absence of Judas in this context!:
Gal 2:9 KJV+ And2532 when James,2385
(2532) Cephas,2786 and2532 John,2491 who seemed1380 to be1511 pillars,4769 perceived1097 the3588 grace5485 that was given1325 unto me,3427 they gave1325 to me1698 and2532 Barnabas921 the right hands1188 of fellowship;2842 that2443 we2249 should go unto1519 the3588 heathen,1484 and1161 they846 unto1519 the3588 circumcision.4061
Gal 2:9 και2532 CONJ γνοντες1097 V-2AAP-NPM την3588 T-ASF χαριν5485 N-ASF την3588 T-ASF δοθεισαν1325 V-APP-ASF μοι3427 P-1DS ιακωβος2385 N-NSM και2532 CONJ κηφας2786 N-NSM και2532 CONJ ιωαννης2491 N-NSM οι3588 T-NPM δοκουντες1380 V-PAP-NPM στυλοι4769 N-NPM ειναι1511 V-PXN δεξιας1188 A-APF εδωκαν1325 V-AAI-3P εμοι1698 P-1DS και2532 CONJ βαρναβα921 N-DSM κοινωνιας2842 N-GSF ινα2443 CONJ ημεις2249 P-1NP [μεν]3303
PRT εις1519 PREP τα3588 T-APN εθνη1484 N-APN αυτοι846 P-NPM δε1161 CONJ εις1519 PREP την3588 T-ASF περιτομην4061 N-ASF
Gal 2:9 TLT+ And2532 when James,2385 (2532) Cephas,2786 and2532 John,2491 who seemed1380 to be1511 pillars,4769 perceived1097 the3588 grace5485 that was given1325 unto me,3427 they gave1325 acts1188 of participation and support2842 in the form of epistles to me1698 and2532 Barnabas921 that2443 we2249 should go unto1519 the3588 heathen,1484 and1161 they846 unto1519 the3588 circumcision.4061
I.e. James, Cephas (Peter,) and John each are being
referenced, per KJV, as having given their active, “the right hands,” support
of Paul’s work “unto the heathen.” The same is perhaps more clearly expressed
(as per TLT above,) by the words “they gave acts of participation and support in the form of epistles to me and Barnabas.” Notice that the
event referenced in Galatians 2:1-11 is the same as that in Acts 15:1-30.
Notice in this context Luke’s words “Judas… confirmed them…” (Acts 15:32(-34.)) Could it be
that this is an indication that Jude was authored from
Are there
any indications re the timing of authorship in the epistle of Jude itself?
Jud 1:3 KJV+ Beloved,27 when I gave4160 all3956 diligence4710 to write1125 unto you5213 of4012 the3588 common2839 salvation,4991 it was needful2192, 318 for
me to write1125 unto you,5213 and exhort3870 you that ye should earnestly contend for1864 the3588 faith4102 which was once530 delivered3860 unto the3588 saints.40
Jud 1:3 The Amplified Bible Beloved, my whole concern was to write to you in
regard to our common salvation. [But] I found it necessary and was impelled to write you urgently appeal to and exhort [you] to contend for the
faith which was once for all handed down to the saints [the faith which is that
sum of Christian belief which was delivered verbally to the holy people of
God].
Jud 1:3 CKW I was anxious to write to you concerning our common salvation, but I
am forced to write urging you to defend the faith that has been once for all delivered
to God’s people.
Reading
KJV one may get the impression that Judas had written something on a prior
occasion, and accordingly that the epistle included in the NT is a later
production of Judas. However, the same Greek words as translated in The Amplified
Bible, and in CKW (Williams, Charles Kingsley, The New Testament – A New
Translation in Plain English, (London 1952,)) seem to obviate such an
impression, do they not? In fact, I find that each of ASV, RSV, Mon (The
Centenary Translation: The New Testament in Modern English (Helen Barrett
Montgomery,)) and Gspd (The New Testament: An American Translation (Edgar J.
Goodspeed)) have similar renditions of Jude 3 as do TAB and CKW. Considering
the corresponding Greek words of Textus Receptus provided in Henrickson’s The
Interlinear Bible I find no support for any reference to any prior writings of
Judas.
Accordingly, I find no indication that the Epistle of
Jude could not have been written as early as at the time referenced in Acts
15:32.
In summary then, I conclude that Jude may likely have been written
subsequent to Hebrews, the four gospels, and Acts, i.e. subsequent to Tishri 22, 45 CE [October 22, 45 CE,] but
may possibly have been written from Antioch in 39 CE, shortly after 1
Peter, James, and 1 John were each written from Jerusalem.
There is also some evidence that Jude
was authored prior to 2 Peter.
Dating
the remaining NT epistles 2 Peter, 2
John and 3 John:
Looking first at 3 John, Gaius is prominently featured
in 3 John and I find several other text passages in the New Testament naming a
certain Gaius, all, or perhaps all but one, apparently referencing one
and the same disciple (possibly with the exception
of either Acts 19:29 or Acts 20:4:)
Act 19:29 And the whole
city was filled with confusion: and having caught Gaius and Aristarchus, men
of
Act 20:4 And there accompanied him [Paul] into Asia
Sopater of Berea; and of the Thessalonians, Aristarchus and Secundus; and Gaius of Derbe, and Timothy; and of
Rom 16:23 Gaius mine host, and of the whole church, saluteth you. Erastus the
chamberlain of the city saluteth you, and Quartus a brother.
1Co 1:14 I thank God
that I baptized none of you, but
Crispus and Gaius;
3Jo 1:1 The elder unto the well-beloved
Gaius, whom I love in the truth.
I perceive in these text passages
what seems to be Gaius’ growth in Christ:
1.
Starting with his, Gaius’, origins in
Derbe (Acts 20:4,)
2.
his baptism by Paul in accord with 1 Cor.
1:14 (Paul’s First Epistle to the Corinthians was written within a few weeks
prior to the Feast of Unleavened Bread in 43 CE (Nero’s 4th civil
year of reign,))
3.
his becoming a travel companion of Paul
(Acts 19:29 probably during Nero’s 3rd year of reign beginning 41 CE
(cf. Acts 19:22 & 20:31;) and/or Acts 20:4, Aviv 44 CE) and
4.
Gaius becoming a chief elder and “host…
of the whole church…” in
Conclusion:
It is
logical to conclude that 2 John and 3 John, were written after 1 John.
It also
appears as though Gaius first came to
As
related re Jude and 2 Peter, because 2 Peter,
2&3 John, Jude, and Revelation are not part of
the 22 canon NT (that, according to tradition, was brought with the Apostle
Thomas to Persia, India, and China where Thomas reportedly founded the Church
of the East,) may appear logical to conclude that 2 Peter, 2&3 John, Jude,
and Revelation were all written after all of said 22 canon NT books and
epistles were written, i.e. subsequent to Tishri 22, 45 CE (subsequent to which
date Hebrews was written.)
However, consider in this context also Gal. 2:9, as discussed under Jude above, which may be an
indication that Jude was written from Antioch only days or weeks after 1 Peter,
1 John, and James.
In 2 Peter I find only two passages usable for dating
this epistle:
The first passage is 2 Peter 1:14-15 where Peter is
apparently hinting at his own demise as if not far into the future. Perhaps this
is an indication of his old age, perhaps he perceives other circumstances? At
any rate this passage is not by itself very helpful for dating this epistle
very exactly.
The second passage is 2 Peter 3:15-16 which is a
little bit more helpful than 2 Peter 1:14-15. Here Peter is giving reference to
“all his [Paul’s] epistles.” This
tells me that 2 Peter cannot have been written until at least 3 of Paul’s
epistles were written, perhaps even all of the ones extant in the NT. Reviewing
the dates when Paul’s epistles were authored (cf. the table listing the
dates of authorship of the NT epistles,) I find that the third epistle written
by Paul (1 Timothy) was written no earlier than during or after the late winter
40/41 CE and before the Third Month, i.e. before Sivan, 41 CE [before June 19,
41 CE] and that the last of Paul’s epistles (Hebrews) was written some time
after Tishri 22, 45 CE [after October
22, 45 CE.] However, in said table, notice that the third and fourth epistles
written by Paul are epistles written not primarily to any church, but to
individual men, i.e. to Timothy and Titus. The third letter written to any
church as such is 1 Corinthians, and accordingly I find that 2 Peter was not
likely authored prior to Paul’s 1st epistle to the Corinthians, i.e.
not prior to 43 CE. Considering that 41 CE is twenty-three years, 43 CE is
twenty-five years, and that 45 CE is twenty-seven years, after the crucifixion
in 18 CE, I perceive that Peter was at this time at least forty or fifty years
of age, perhaps more. That is 25 plus say 20 years = 45 years of age at the
very least.
Considering both of the above passages in 2 Peter I
conclude that 2 Peter was written at the very earliest 41 CE, not likely before 43
CE, but probably some unspecified time, even years, after Tishri 22, 45 CE [after October 22, 45
CE.]
As above
related re Jude and 3 John, because 2 Peter,
2&3 John, Jude, and Revelation are not part of
the 22 canon NT (that, according to tradition, was brought with the Apostle
Thomas to Persia, India, and China where Thomas reportedly founded the Church
of the East,) it is logical to conclude that 2 Peter, 2&3 John, Jude,
and Revelation were all written after all of said 22 canon NT books and
epistles were written, i.e. subsequent to Tishri 22, 45 CE (subsequent to which
date Hebrews was written.)
All things considered I conclude that 2
Peter was written subsequent to Tishri 22,
45 CE [after October 22, 45 CE] (almost certainly not before 43 CE.)
There are some linguistic textual reasons for placing the authorship of Jude
prior to 2 Peter:
“An
interesting question is raised by the fact that much of Jude’s material is
found also in 2 Peter (cf. Jude 4-18 with 2 Peter 2:1 to 3:3). Not only the
same thoughts, but in many instances the same words are used, with some words
quite unusual. Did Jude borrow from 2 Peter, Peter from Jude, or did they
both borrow from a common but unknown source? This question cannot be answered
with finality. Most Biblical scholars think that Jude is the earlier of the two
letters, since it would be difficult to explain why Jude would write a letter
at all if he had little to say beyond what was already well expressed in 2
Peter. These scholars assert that it is easy to explain how Peter might have
used thoughts expressed in Jude’s brief epistle, and then have added material
to it. Literary studies show that the shorter of two similar works is usually
the earlier. However, a minority of scholars defends the priority of 2 Peter
over that of Jude. Among the reasons set forth are the following: (1) 2 Peter
2:1 speaks of the future appearance of false teachers whereas Jude gives the
impression that these teachers are already at work (Jude 4). (2) Jude speaks of the warning about the
coming of skeptics as being in the past (vs. 17, 18), whereas Peter utters a
current warning (2 Peter 3:3).” (Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, Volume
7, p.701-2.)
Comments and
donations freely accepted at:
Tree of Life©
c/o General Delivery
Nora [near SE-713 01]
eMail: TreeOfLifeTime@gmail.com
…
…
The GateWays into Tree of Life Chronology Forums©
The
GateWays of Entry into the Tree of Life Time Chronology Touching upon the Book
of Daniel©
Pearls & Mannah – “I found it!”
Feel free to use, and for sharing freely with others,
any of the truth and blessings belonging to God alone. I retain all the
copyrights to the within, such that no one may lawfully restrain my use and my
sharing of it with others. Including also all the errors that remain. Please
let only me know about those. I need to know in order to correct them. Others
don’t need to be focused upon the errors that belong to me alone. Please
respect that, and please do not hesitate to let me know of any certain error
that you find!
Without recourse. All Rights Reserved. Tree of Life©
[1] Efter mångårigt fokuserat studium av de
bästa referenser och verktyg jag hitintills kunnat finna ser jag ingen
anledning att inte betrakta en verklighet sådan att månad nummer ett, enligt
Skaparens egen kalender såsom den definieras i den Heliga skrift, under antiken
och under den tid då den Heliga Skrift författades, grundats på när havren
mognat på det berg vilket Jerusalem är beläget och ej på när havren mognat i
varmare och lägre liggande områden inom landet Israel, såsom tidigare
förmodats, exempelvis i Jordan
dalen eller i
Negevöknen [2010 rapporterna; 2011
rapporten]. Jämför denna
länk!