Adopted Son, OR Joseph's own Son?

Tryck här för den svenska versionen!

Statement of belief: “Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth.” (John 17:17 KJV)

. Please notice the highlighted considerations below!!

Created 5942_{[v2016-12-14-21:32]}02 20 2039 [2023-06-09]

Time for yet another step in the Protestant Movement?

More truthful independent Bible translations!

No more Bibles “Authorized by…” the Vatican, by the Government, or by any other Authority of men!

Revelation 14:8; 18:4!

Adopted by Joseph,

OR His Own Son?

Is the Gospel of Luke Indicating That Jesus was Merely the Adopted Son of Joseph, or…?

Have We Been Fooled All These Years?

An In-Depth Study of the Aramaic Behind Luke 3:23

But isn’t Luke indicating that Jesus was merely the adopted son of Joseph?

”Jesus… being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli…”

Luke 3:23

Is the above translation reliable, in particular re the words “(as was supposed)”?

Most among us have been fooled to believe that the original texts of the New Testament, and Luke in particular, were written in the Greek language. Is that true? Or have we been fooled to believe a lie? As for me, by my own studies and careful comparisons of the available sources, I am now convinced that the New Testament, including Luke, was written in Hebrew, translated first into Aramaic, then into Greek, and finally from Greek into our own modern languages.

I am no expert in Hebrew, Aramaic, or Greek, outside of such words, terms, and expressions as touches upon timing and date stamps. Accordingly I find it difficult to find a clear and correct translation of the full text of Luke 3:23, and of Acts 1:3.

Nonetheless, I find that the uncertainty expressed, by the words “” Luke 3:23, and by the words “” Acts 1:3 (cf. below!), finds no support whatsoever in the Aramaic text behind the Greek translations and manuscripts falsely claimed to constitute the best available transcripts of the original Greek New Testament… But…

Make up your own mind!

(Sw.: Avgör själv!)

“מלכותא” - (Kingdoms of God…), Plural, Why?

I find it most interesting and valuable to discover that the Aramaic word above is a plural word! Why? What’s the meaning? What’s the intent? As for my part, I find a most clear and certain pointer towards each and any such family units among us as are choosing to do their very best towards claiming no one besides the Creator as their one and only owner and authority. In my own experience, over the years, it has become ever more clear and ever more important to recognize, and to act upon, said insight. That is, in stark contrast to the implications and consequences of consenting to any type of registration of one self and of one’s family members under the State, under the Church, and thus under the claims of ownership of Satan himself.

Comments and donations freely accepted at:

Tree of Life^©

e-Post: TreeOfLifeTime@gmail.com

Pearls & Mannah – “I found it!”

Home

Feel free to use, and for sharing freely with others, any of the truth and blessings belonging to God alone. I retain all the copyrights to the within, such that no one may lawfully restrain my use and my sharing of it with others. Including also all the errors that remain. Please let only me know about those. I need to know in order to correct them. Others don’t need to be focused upon the errors that belong to me alone. Please respect that, and please do not hesitate to let me know of any certain error that you find!