Without recourse.
All Rights Reserved. Tree of Life©
Statement
of belief: “Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word
is truth.” (John 17:17 KJV)
Created 5924[(*??*)] 11 20 2028
[2012-03-14]
Edit of 5924[(*??*)] 03 03 2028
[2012-06-24] - Including extensive revisions of prior
versions, due primarily to new findings re the duration and exact date of the
pole shift of Joshua’s Long Day. Furthers updates of various video clips, that
will include said revisions, are still pending where indicated on a link by
link basis. .
Edit of 5924[(*??*)] 03 12 2028 [2012-07-03] – Added the
Zechariah 9:4 portion.
Edit of 5924[(*??*)] 05 17 2028 [2012-09-05] – Added updated hub view videos re Joshua’s
Long Day.
Edit of 5924[(*??*)] 06 24 2028 [2012-10-10] – Added the quote
and most of the words within the Abstract beginning
with the words “Perhaps I ought to mention...”
Edit 5924[(*??*)] 06 24 2028 [2012-10-11] – Added Ezekiel 26:17-21 and footnote
#4.
Edit 5925[(*??*)] 10 04 2029 [2013-01-17] – Added Jeremiah 51:42.
Edit 5925[(*??*)] 11 13 2029
[2013-02-24] – Added Jer
51:55 and Psalms 46:2-3.[1]
Edit 5925[(*??*)] 02 20 2029 [2013-05-31] – Correcting the
dates attributed to the pole shift in Hezekiah’s 15th year of reign.
Edit 5925[(*??*)] 03 03 2029 [2013-06-13] – Highlighting the instances of the date June 14… 1421
BCE and adding a footnote to that.
Edit 5925[(*??*)] 03 27 2029 [2013-07-07] – Adding a quote re
the Chinese record re when
the sun set twice in one day.
Edit 5925[(*??*)] 03 29 2029 [2013-07-09] – Adding quotes re
the African, Chinese, and American
records re Joshua’s Long Day.
Edit 5925[(*??*)] 04 09 2029 [2013-07-19] –Added Ezekiel 27:26.. -36
Added 5925[(*??*)] 09 27 2029
[2013-12-31] – Added paragraph
onto footnote; re July 3, 1420 BCE pole shift; and re Hag HaOmer vs.
crossing Jordan.
Intermediate edit 5938[v2016-12-14-21:32]
04 25 2035 [2019-06-30] – Changed poleshift date (1426
BCE) including footnotes and more in one paragraph, BUT!!, including an
erroneous assumption of two (2) days delay per poleshift!!! – Cf. the last prior version!
Edited 5939[v2016-12-14-21:32] 08 12 2036 [2019-10-11] –Added Amos
9:5-6.
GateWay to the Tree Of Life ©
Diagrams and
Computer Simulations of
Real Time Historical Pole
Shifts and of
Projected Future Pole Shifts
That Could Begin any Time…
Abstract:
Praise
the Lord of Hosts, the Creator of the Universe, who is constantly revealing
secrets long forgotten!
“Surely the Lord GOD will do
nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets.” (Amos
3:7)
Based on
little more than 1) the map studies of Charles Hapgood as reported in his books
“Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings” and “Path of the Pole,” that is, for the exact
locations of the poles; 2) the timing obvious from the eyewitness reports
pertaining to the long day of Joshua, and the day when “the LORD… brought the shadow
ten degrees backward, by which it had gone down in the dial of Ahaz…,” and 3) the best available
astronomy science, I have found it possible to make computer reconstructions
that agree perfectly with the above said records…
Beginning
with a rough reconstruction of Ahaz’s sundial and the event recorded by the
words: “The
LORD… brought the shadow ten degrees backward, by which it had gone down in the
dial of Ahaz”
(2 Kings 20:(9-)11,) I then continued by delving more deeply into the somewhat
more intricate details of Joshua’s Long Day than I did at first (for my initial
version of Joshua’s Long Day please cf. this link[2].) As it turned out the Scripture
record of Joshua’s Long Day taught me more exactly the duration of that pole
shift (55.5 ±2 hours,) which duration I believe is more than likely much the
same as for each and all other pole shifts.
For a
little more background to my delving into this particular line of study, please
refer to this
link and to this
one…
Perhaps I ought to mention too, one reference, first published
in 1956, from which an artist friend of
mine read aloud to me[3] after seeing some of my pole shift
models presented below. Within the passage from which my friend read, I find a
few paragraphs giving reference to certain records within the Holy Writ, while
in that context giving reference also to sudden violent pole shifts that has
occurred in the past and which may occur at any time even now:
“I call your attention to a record contained within your own Holy Writ.
If you study it carefully, you will notice…
“It may interest you to learn that a gradual tilting of your Earth is even now taking place. If,
as could happen at any moment, it should make a complete tilt in order to
fulfill its cycle… and if
the peoples on your planet learn to live according to the Creator’s laws, you
too can attain a thousand years in the one body…[4]
“This tilting of… Earth… A
drastic tilt of one planet would…
“[A]nd although the laws which govern the relationship of man to the
world on which he lives [is] not at this present time… understood by men of
Earth, I want to stress that the erring path which they have followed so consistently
is actually the reason for their ignorance of your planet’s present
instability. Through the ages, there have been
many signs and omens which [the] people [on Earth] have ignored. Many of these
have been recorded in your Holy Writ... But your people heeded
them not. And although many have already been fulfilled, the lesson has not
been learned. It is not wise to become independent of the Creator of all.
Mankind must be guided by the hand that has given him life.” [5]
May I
suggest that each one of us pursues each his or her own search for the
treasures of life – and for long term survival – not excluding the computer
simulations being made available below…
At the
present time[6] I wish to add a disclaimer re the exact itineraries[7] being identified in my currently published computer simulations
(below.) Contrary to my earlier impression re alternative routes for such
itineraries, I have lately discovered good reasons for identifying more complex
itineraries than the ones available below… Please look for future updates of
this article accordingly!...:
Computer simulations:
1. Attempted
reconstructions of the events recorded in eyewitness’s accounts:
a. “The LORD… brought the shadow
ten degrees backward, by which it had gone down in the
dial of Ahaz (link update pending!):” 2 Kings 20:(9-)11
i.
As best I can tell, the dial of Ahaz’s was a
sundial designed to show the time of day by means of the shadow of the sun.
Accordingly, I have designed a simple sundial set on the face of the Earth and
located at the location of Jerusalem, that is, within my computer simulation of
the series of pole shifts here being made available to you.
As
it turns out, when my sundial is 1) placed in that position, 2) set to the pre
Hezekiah sun at the time of an equinox, and 3) the timing of the pole shift
relative to the sun is adjusted such that the solar shadow reverses its path in
the 10th hour of day, then that it is all it takes for reproducing
all the details I find recorded in the Holy Scriptures re this event. Indeed, I
find that the realities seen within this reconstruction sheds much light on the
exact meaning of the words within said Scripture record:
1. Not only is the
sun’s shadow reversing its path at the 10th hour of the day, but…
2. From that time
on, as perceived from the Jerusalem horizon, the path of the sun on the sky is
reversed, and…
3. From that time
on, even until now, the shadow on that sundial is beginning the day in the 10th
hour of the dial of Ahaz and back tracking from that point until sunset every
evening…
You’ll
find my reconstruction of Ahaz’s sundial at this
link. It is a bit large, (747MB,) so if you should prefer to get that file
on a DVD, along with the rest of my currently available simulations below, then
please notify me by email and send me
something in exchange for the time and efforts necessary for me to prepare and
send you these gifts of our Creator in DVD format.
b. Joshua’s
Long Day:
i.
A sun dial view (118MB) of Joshua’s long day. Notice how the Jerusalem area, at the
base of the sundial pin, is always getting within the dark night zone before
and after the pole shift, and how, during the pole shift, it makes an exception
to that rule, by getting close enough to the land of the midnight sun, such
that it never gets into that darkest zone of the night… Notice also how the
shadow of the Sun disappears as the Sun passes the zenith… Lastly, notice how
the solar shadow is reversing its direction at the end of the pole shift…;
ii.
A
Jerusalem centered view (118MB) of our planet at the time of Joshua’s Long Day,
which day—within one of the years[8] between 1431 BCE and 1426 BCE—included a transfer of Jerusalem[9] from longitude 99 East to longitude
37 West, that is, more than nine time zones further west, while bringing in its
luggage the prime Scriptural reference for time reckoning. That is, such that,
for each of the two subsequent poleshifts, the Julian Day calendar etc. ended
up adding one day over and above the one and only calendar that is based upon
the record of the Holy Scriptures, and upon the throne of God, that is, upon
the location of the Ark of the Covenant. Again, please notice the items
referenced at 1.b.i above!
Meaning in effect that, for each poleshift between any given point in
times past, and between present time, in order to determine the Jerusalem
based, i.e. Ark of the Covenant based, actual day of the week associated with
any given date in the ancient past, one week day must be subtracted from the
week day reported for that given date by means of e.g. the Julian
Day and Civil Day Calculator!
Compare
also the following words out of the ancient Hebrew Scriptures. Notice that Amos
lived between the time of Joshua and the time of King Hezekiah, that is,
between those two pole shifts!:
Psalms 46:2 KJV
Therefore
will not we fear, though the earth be removed, and though the mountains be
carried into the midst of the sea;
Psalms 46:3 KJV
Though the waters thereof roar and be troubled, though the mountains shake with the
swelling thereof. Selah.
63 And when they were
smiting, at the time of twilight [towards an expected Seventh Day
Shabbat,] Joshua said in the sight of all the people, Sun, stand thou
still within Gibeon, and thou moon in the valley
of Ajalon, until the nation shall have revenged itself upon its enemies.
64 And the Lord hearkened to the voice of Joshua, and the [shadow of the] sun perished [as the Sun crossed
zenith] in the midst of the heavens, and stood thirty six hours [i.e. the light
of the Sun did not fully disappear until after the subsequent sunset, which
occurred within the thirty-sixth water clock hour (vs. after the usual twelve
hours following sunrise.)] And also the [full] moon stood [remained above the
horizon] and did not set until the day was fully come [i.e. until after the sun
was risen above the horizon.]
65 And there was no day like that, before it or after
it, that the Lord hearkened to the voice of a man, for the Lord fought for
Israel.
(Book
of Jasher 88:63-65; TLT © translation highlighted)
Jer 51:42 KJV The sea is come up upon Babylon: she is
covered with the multitude of the waves thereof.
Jer 51:55 KJV Because the LORD hath spoiled Babylon, and destroyed
out of her the great voice; when her waves do roar like great waters, a noise
of their voice is uttered:
Amos 8:9 והיה
ביום ההוא נאם
אדני יהוה
והבאתי
השׁמשׁ בצהרים
והחשׁכתי
לארץ ביום
אור׃
Amos 8:9 TLT © And there was in that day an oracle of the Lord
Yahweh, and the sun came to zenith, and [oncoming] darkness [returned] to the
earth within one day [i.e. before the end of astronomical twilight:]
Amos 8:9 KJV And it shall come to pass in that day, saith
the Lord GOD, that I will cause the sun to go down at noon, and I will darken
the earth in the clear day:
Amos 9:5 ואדני
יהוה הצבאות הנוגע
בארץ ותמוג ואבלו
כל־יושׁבי בה ועלתה
כיאר כלה ושׁקעה
כיאר מצרים׃
Amos 9:6 הבונה
בשׁמים מעלותו
ואגדתו על־ארץ
יסדה הקרא למי־הים
וישׁפכם על־פני
הארץ יהוה שׁמו׃
Amos 9:5 KJV And
the Lord GOD of hosts is he that toucheth the land, and it shall melt, and all
that dwell therein shall mourn: and it shall rise up wholly like a flood; and
shall be drowned, as by the flood of Egypt.
Amos 9:6 KJV It is
he that buildeth his stories in the heaven, and hath founded his troop in the
earth; he that calleth for the waters of the sea, and poureth them out upon the
face of the earth: The LORD is his name.
Ezekiel 26:3 TLT
© Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against thee, O Tyrus, and will
cause many nations to come up against thee, as the ocean caused his waves to come up [to bury thy throne in the midst
of the sea.]
Ezekiel 26:4 TLT © And they shall destroy the walls of Tyrus,
and break down her towers: I will also scrape her dust from her, and make her
like the top of a rock.
. . .
Ezekiel 26:17 TLT © And they shall take up a lamentation for
thee, and say to thee, How art thou destroyed, that wast inhabited of seafaring men,
the renowned city, which wast strong in the sea, she and her inhabitants, which
cause their terror to be on all that haunt it!
Ezekiel 26:18 TLT © Now shall the isles tremble in the day of thy
fall; yea, the isles that are in the sea shall be troubled at thy departure.
Ezekiel 26:19 TLT © For thus saith the Lord GOD; When I shall
make thee a desolate city, like the cities that are not inhabited; when I shall bring up the deep upon thee,
and great waters shall cover thee;
Ezekiel 26:20 TLT © When I shall bring thee down with them that descend
into the pit, with the people of old time, and shall set thee in the low parts
of the earth, in
places desolate of old, with them that go down to the pit, that thou be not
inhabited; and I shall set glory in the land of the living;
Ezekiel 26:21 TLT © I will make thee a terror, and thou shalt be no more: though thou be sought for,
yet shalt thou never be found again, saith the Lord GOD.
. . .
Ezekiel 27:26 KJV
Thy
rowers have brought thee into great waters: the east wind hath broken thee in the
midst of the seas.
Ezekiel 27:27 KJV
Thy
riches, and thy fairs, thy merchandise, thy mariners, and thy pilots, thy
calkers, and the occupiers of thy merchandise, and all thy men of war, that are in thee, and in all thy company which is in
the midst of thee, shall fall into the midst of the seas in the day of thy
ruin.
. . .
Ezekiel 27:32 KJV
And in
their wailing they shall take up a lamentation for thee, and lament over thee, saying, What city is like Tyrus, like the destroyed in
the midst of the sea?
. . .
Ezekiel 27:34 KJV
In the
time when thou shalt be broken by the seas in the depths of
the waters thy
merchandise and all thy company in the midst of thee shall fall.
. . .
Ezekiel 27:36 KJV The merchants among the people shall hiss at
thee; thou shalt be a
terror, and never shalt be any more.
. . .
Ezekiel 28:8 TLT © They shall bring thee down to the pit, and
thou shalt die the deaths of them that were slain in the midst of the
seas.
Ezekiel 26:3 KJV
Therefore
thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against thee, O Tyrus, and will cause many nations to
come up against thee, as the sea causeth his waves to come up.
Ezekiel 26:4 KJV
And they
shall destroy the walls of Tyrus, and break down her towers: I will also scrape
her dust from her, and make her like the top of a rock.
. . .
Ezekiel 26:17 KJV And they shall take up a
lamentation for thee, and say to thee, How art thou destroyed, that wast inhabited of seafaring men,
the renowned city, which wast strong in the sea, she and her inhabitants, which
cause their terror to be on all that haunt it!
Ezekiel 26:18 KJV Now shall the isles tremble
in the day of thy fall; yea, the isles that are in the sea shall be troubled
at thy departure.
Ezekiel 26:19 KJV For thus saith the Lord GOD;
When I shall make thee a desolate city, like the cities that are not inhabited;
when I shall bring up the deep upon thee, and great waters shall cover thee;
Ezekiel 26:20 KJV When I shall bring thee down
with them that descend into the pit, with the people of old time, and shall set
thee in the low parts of the earth, in places desolate of old, with them that
go down to the pit, that thou be not inhabited; and I shall set glory in the
land of the living;
Ezekiel 26:21 KJV I will make thee a terror,
and thou shalt be no more: though thou be sought for,
yet shalt thou never be found again, saith the Lord GOD.
. . .
Ezekiel 28:8 KJV They shall bring thee down to the pit, and
thou shalt die the deaths of them that are slain in the midst of the
seas.
Zechariah 9:4 הנהH2009 אדניH136 יורשׁנהH3423 והכהH5221 ביםH3220 חילהH2428 והיאH1931 באשׁH784 תאכל׃H398
Zechariah 9:4 TLT © Behold,H2009 the LordH136 is possessing her [Tyrus],H3423 and he did smiteH5221 her empire [the Phoenician worldwide
empire, Atlantis, Mu, Lemuria]H2428 in the sea;H3220 and she [Tyrus (Meaning ‘stone, rock [as in
the solid naked truth],’ cf. Strong’s H6864-5 & Daniel 2:34, 44!;) an
outpost of said empire]H1931 will be destroyedH398 with fire.H784
Zechariah 9:4 KJV Behold,H2009 the LordH136 will cast her out,H3423 and he will smiteH5221 her powerH2428 in the sea;H3220 and sheH1931 shall be devouredH398 with fire.H784
iii.
North
pole helio centric view (that is, with the camera fixed in space over the
rotating north pole of Earth’s core.) Notice the motion of stake placed at
Jerusalem relative to the yellow coordinate system (beginning towards the
middle of the video.) Likewise, towards the end of the pole shift, notice the
motion of pole stake #3 towards the North Pole of said yellow coordinate
system; 945MB)
iv.
North
pole view (that is, fixed to the coordinate system of Earth’s core while
viewing the North Pole of Earth’s core.) Notice the path of the sun dial and of
the tall stake at Jerusalem as they move relative to the core of the Earth
(118MB.)
v.
The details of the Sun’s path on the sky during
the pole shift of Joshua’s Long Day are outlined in columns ##22, 24, and 32-33
within the table at this link.
vi.
The details of the Moon’s path on the sky
during the pole shift of Joshua’s Long Day are outlined in columns ##26, 28,
and 30-31 within the table at this link.
vii.
The more exact details of Jerusalem’s itinerary
relative to the core of the Earth during the pole shift of Joshua’s Long Day is
outlined in column #21 “Location of Jerusalem (in terms of Earth’s geographical
coordinate system)” within the table at this link.
2. A World Map
showing the
geographical coordinates of the time prior to the pole shift (An
early and incorrect version -update pending!) that occurred in the 15th
year of King Hezekiah [in the year beginning Tishri 22, 699 BCE.]
3. Multi pole
shift overviews:
a. Front views (fixed over the equator of Earth’s
core:)
i.
Five
pole shifts (An early and incorrect version -update pending!) (3 past and 2 future) – fixed relative to
Earth’s core, and with coordinate systems showing the motion of that of the
crust relative to that of the core (169MB.) Added on 5924[(*??*)] 12 25 2028 [2012-04-17.]
ii.
Five
pole shifts (An early and incorrect version -update pending!) (3 past and 2 future) – as viewed from the
sun (235MB.)
iii.
An earlier front
view; pre-Hezekiah core version limited to the last three pole shifts
(118MB.) (An early and incorrect version -update pending!)
b. South pole view (that is, fixed over the south
pole of Earth’s core:)
i.
Via
60 E pole; present time core (twisted;) 188MB (An early and incorrect
version -update pending!)
ii.
An earlier version of the same (not including
the second future pole shift (to
the 89 E pole; present time core (twisted;) 188MB.) (An early and incorrect
version -update pending!)
iii.
A still earlier version, similar to the last
prior (to
the 89 E pole; present core, but upside down; 141MB.) (An early and
incorrect version -update pending!)
iv.
A still earlier version, similar to the last
prior (to
the 89 E pole; pre-Hezekiah core; 141MB.) (An early and incorrect version
-update pending!)
c. North pole views (that is, fixed over the north
pole of Earth’s core:)
i.
(Via
89 E to Pacific pole; present core (twisted;) 188MB) (An early and incorrect
version -update pending!)
ii.
An earlier
version of the same (not including the second future pole shift (188MB.)
(An early and incorrect version -update pending!)
iii.
A still earlier version, similar to the last
prior (89
E pole; pre-Hezekiah core; 141MB.) (An early and incorrect version -update
pending!)
4. The pole
shift of Joshua’s long day (June 11-13, 1426 BCE[10]:)
a. Hub
view Pacific Ocean (86 MB. Added
on 5924[(*??*)] 05 17 2028 [2012-09-05.]
[My earlier incorrect version is still
available for comparison here
(31MB.)]
b. Hub
view South Atlantic Ocean (86 MB. Added on 5924[(*??*)] 05 17 2028 [2012-09-05.] [My earlier incorrect version is
still available for comparison here
(31MB.)]
c. Records of
Joshua’s Long Day from
numerous locations around the world: Cf. this link (cashed)!
The Egyptian Account of Joshua’s Long Day
“Toward the end of the last century, Charles Adiel
Lewis Totten, then a retired Professor of Military Science from Yale
University, published a controversial study on Joshua’s long day.23 The
book dealt extensively with Joshua’s long day and Hezekiah’s
sign. In recent times attempts to discredit it center more on the
person of Totten than they do on the mathematics and science
involved. Totten was the editor of Our Race, a
publication devoted to the promotion of what today is called “British
Israelitism,” although Totten’s stance is eminently more realistic and moderate
than that taken by that faction today. Robert Olden24 says Totten obtained most of his material
from J. B. Dimbleby of South Hackney, England, who was the premier chronologist
of the British Chronological Society. Lest Totten be accused of plagiarism,
Dimbleby is cited numerous times in Totten’s works. Totten has also
been accused of worshipping the Great Pyramid of Giza, from which, it is
claimed, he received his inspiration for his work on Joshua’s long
day. Actually, the latter sounds more like Dimbleby, for a reading
of Totten’s works on the Great Pyramid reveals none of the mysticism implied by
the charge…
“One of Totten’s sources is a report by the Greek
historian Herodotus who wrote that when he visited Egypt, the priests there
showed him an ancient manuscript which told the story of a day which lasted
about twice as long as a nor mal day…
“The sun, thrown into confusion, had remained low on the horizon, and by
not rising had spread terror amongst the great doctors. Two days had
been rolled into one. The morning was lengthened to one-and-a-half
times the normal period of effective daylight. A certain time after
this divine phenomenon, the master had an image built to keep further
misfortune from the country…
“Rameses, our
celestial ancestral chief; you who forced these wretched people to work, who
ill-treated them, who gave them no help when they were in need: cast them into
the sea. They made the moon stop in a small angle at the edge of the
horizon. In a small angle on the edge of the horizon, the sun
itself, which had just risen at the spot where the moon was going, instead of
crossing the sky stayed where it was. Whilst the moon, following a
narrow path, reduced its speed and climbed slowly, the sun stopped moving and
its intensity of light was reduced to the brightness at
daybreak. The waves formed a wall of water against the boats that
were in the harbor and those that had left it. Those fishermen that had
ventured onto the deck to watch the waves were washed into the sea.”
The Chinese Account of Joshua’s Long Day (cf. below!:)
“The second
secular source about Joshua’s long day, which was mentioned by Totten, is based
on what seems to be a recently lost ancient Chinese manuscript. In 1810 Gill
presents the account:
“In the Chinese history27 it
is reported, that in the time of their seventh emperor, Yao, the sun did not
set for ten days, and that men were afraid the world would be burnt, and there
were great fires at that time; and though the time of the sun’s standing still
were enlarged beyond the bounds of truth, yet it seems to refer to this fact,
and was manifestly about the same time; for this miracle was wrought in the
year of the world 2554, which fell in the 75th, or, as some say, the
67th year of that emperor’s reign, who reigned 90 years.28
“Now the year
of the world 2554 is identical to Bouw’s independently derived biblical
chronology for the date of Joshua’s long day.29 Incidentally,
note that a 90-year reign (not Yao’s age) is thoroughly consistent with the 110
to 120 year ages achieved by Moses, Aaron, and Joshua who would have been
contemporaries of Yao. The length of time mentioned by the Chinese,
ten days, may be too long simply because the Chinese did not have clocks which
ran independently of the sun’s motion so that the estimate would be purely
subjective. Probably, the duration was exaggerated both by the
trauma of the event and in the transmission of the story through time.
“Despite the
solid-sounding account by Gill, manuscripts which have survived to the
twentieth century do not include the long day. The first mention of
the long day associated with emperor Yao was by Hübner in 1733.30 Although Hübner was quoted
during that century, no manuscript exists today. Those manuscripts
which have survived to this day differ from Hübner’s in at least two ways:
first, there is no mention of the 10-day long day, and second, the reign of Yao
is reported to be 100 years, not 90.
“Although there is no mention of the ten-day
long day in current Chinese accounts, there is one in the “Brahman Yast,” one
of the books of the Avesta. That reference is not, however, to
a past event. Instead, it is a
prophecy. The Avesta says that 1600 years from the date of
the Persian culture (corresponding to about A.D. 1200), Hushedar will be born
and, at age 30, he will command the sun to stand still for 10 days and
nights. Obviously, the prophecy never came to pass, still it is
strongly reminiscent of the Chinese account and may either have confused Hübner
or else may reflect the actual Chinese account used by Hübner.”
North American Accounts of Joshua’s Long Day
“Tales relating to Joshua’s long day abound in North
America. Almost all of the tales in North America tell of a long
night. The only exceptions are those related in the chapter on
Hezekiah’s sign. Olcott31 has collected five of particular
interest:
1.
The Ojibways tell of a long night without any light.32
2.
The Wyandot Indians told missionary Paul Le Jeune of a
long night.33
3.
The Dogrib Indians of the North-West tell of a day
when the sun was caught at noon and it instantly became dark.34
4.
The Omahas say that once the sun was caught in a trap
by a rabbit who checked his traps at the break of dawn, presumably before
sunrise.35 (This
may be Hezekiah’s sign, instead.) Finally,
5.
the Bungee Indians from the Lake Winnipeg area of
Canada also tell of a long night.36
Central and South American Accounts of Joshua’s Long
Day
“In the Annals of Chauhtitlan, the Mexican Indians tell of a
long night. The Aztecs wrote of an extended period of time when the
sun did not rise:
“... So a conclave of the gods was called in Teotihuacan, and there it was
decided that one of them should offer himself as a sacrifice that once again
the world might have a sun ... The sacrificed gods had disappeared in the
brazier’s flames, but as there was no sign of the sun, the remaining wonder
when it would first appear. At long last, the sun burst forth ... But the sun,
despite his brilliant light, did not move; he hung on the edge of the sky,
apparently unwilling to begin his appointed task.37 ”
“In their national book the Popol Vuh, (which
translates into “Book of the Princes,”) the Quiché Mayans of Guatemala wrote
about the people’s reaction to a long night with these words:
“They did not sleep; they remained standing and great was the anxiety of
their hearts and their stomachs for the coming of the dawn and the day ... “Oh,
... if we only could see the rising of the sun! What shall we do
now?” ... They talked, but they could not calm their hearts which were anxious
for the coming of the dawn.38 ”
Overview of Accounts of Joshua’s Long Day:
”Joshua’s
long day around the world: The solid black circles show locations with
tales of a long night; open circles plot tales of a long day, and the
half-white half-black circle in the Pacific shows the location of a long
sunrise tale. Recently, after this figure was made, another long
sunrise tale was reported in Hawaii.”
Footnotes:
23 Totten, C. A. L., 1891. Joshua’s Long Day and the Dial of Ahaz,
A Scientific Vindication and A Midnight Cry, 3rd Edition, (New
Haven: Our Race Publ. Co.) Reprinted in 1968 by Destiny Publishers, Merrimac,
Mass.
24 Olden, R. L., 1970. “The Lost Day of Joshua,” Ministry, (November/December).
The publication is put out by the Seventh Day Adventists.
25 The translation that follows came from the Cercle Scientifique et
Historique, France and Belgium. It is presumably taken from among Crombette’s
three volumes of Verdique Historique de l’Egypte Antique.
26 Aardema, V., 1975. Why Mosquitoes Buzz in People’s Ears, (New
York: Dial Press).
27 Martin. Sinie.
Histor. I., 1. p. 25.
28 Gill, John. 1810. An Exposition of the Old Testament (London:
Matthews and Leigh), vol. 2, p. 831. Gill’s work was reprinted in 1979 under the
title Gill’s Expositor, (Streamwood, Ill. 60103: Primitive Baptist
Library).
29 Bouw, Op. cit.
30 Hübner, J., 1733. Kurtze Fragen aus der
Politischen Historia.
31 Olcott, W. T., 1914. Sun Lore of all Ages: A Collection of Myths and Legends
Concerning the Sun and its Worship, (New York:
G. P. Putnam’s Sons).
32 Ibid., p. 212.
33 Ibid., p. 215.
34 Ibid., p. 216.
35 Ibid., p. 217.
36 Ibid., p. 218.
37 Caso, A. 1937. The Religion of the
Aztecs, (Mexico City: Popular Library of Mexican Culture, Central News
Co.), pp. 15-16.
38 Goetz, D. and S. G. Morley, translators, 1972. Popul
Vuh: The Sacred Book of the Quiche Maya, (Norman, Oklahoma), Part III, Chapters 4-7, pp. 172-190.
39 Bancroft, H. H., 1883. Native Races of the
Pacific States, (5 volumes), Vol. 3, pp. 58-62.
40 Montesinos, F., 1882. Memorias Antiguas
Historiales de Peru. The manuscript for that book dates from
1648. A translation of it was done by P. A. Means for the Habluyt
Society of London in 1920. Notes from Z. Sitchin, The Lost
Realms, (New York: Avon Books), Ch. 7.
5. The pole
shift of Hezekiah’s 15th year of reign (in the year beginning Tishri 22, 699 BCE:)
a. Great for
studying the event causing the Alaska muck deposits:
i.
Hub
view Central Africa (15MB.) (An early and incorrect version -update
pending!)
ii.
Hub
view Pacific Ocean (26MB.) (An early and incorrect version -update
pending!)
iii.
North
Pole view (15MB.) (An early and incorrect version -update pending!)
iv.
South
Pole view (15MB.) (An early and incorrect version -update pending!)
b. Focusing upon the
location of the vases of Attica and of Tuscany of the Etruscan people, i.e.
Athens, Greece (27 degrees South) and upper Italy (38 degrees South,) prior to
the last pole shift, i.e. the pole shift of Hezekiah’s 15th year of
reign. (30KB) More…
(An early and incorrect version -update pending!)
c. Quoting from YouTube: “Pole
Shifts : Growing Evidence for Catastrophic Shifts Past and Present” at
01:03:05.
“The sun sat in the west, rose back up again from the west almost to the
high noon position and then resumed its normal path.” “It is the day they refer to as the day the
sun set twice in one day.”
But compare above!…
6. Future pole
shifts -
Recommended for studies of potential tsunami wave movements across the various
continents. As to the timing I have no clue… That is, besides it being long
overdue and besides those previously
hidden Bible Codes that seem to indicate that the Earth, or large portions
of it, may be annihilated at the time of Passover 2012, that is, in connection
with certain named comets that are at this time quite close to us…:
a. Pacific
Ocean hub view; 60 E pole… (54MB.) (An early and incorrect version -update
pending!)
b. Older version -
Pacific
Ocean hub view… (54MB.) (An early and incorrect version -update pending!)
c. Atlantic
Ocean hub view; 60 E pole… (54MB.) (An early and incorrect version -update
pending!)
d. Older version -
Atlantic
Ocean hub view… (54MB.) (An early and incorrect version -update pending!)
Considerations re the correlations between current
astronomy software timing and the timing beyond the pole shifts:
When
using astronomy software and such tables as are being provided by Fred Espenak/NASA
etc.: How may the data available by such tools be corrected or improved,
specifically in re to such events as are dated prior to Joshua’s Long Day, by
means of the within findings re timed pole shifts?
First
I notice that there is no simple rule applicable alike for any and all
locations. The timing for each location will have to be modified on an
individual basis. That is, relative to UT as provided by e.g. the NASA tables
for any given event, the true time difference for an event prior to the last
pole shift will necessarily differ from one location to another. To arrive at
the correct time for such an event one must be able to determine not only the
geographical coordinates for such a location before and after a given pole
shift, but also one must determine whether the new location moves the any given
date ahead of, or else behind such a date as may at first seem indicated by
means of a chronology that is not heretofore giving recognition to these
relatively recent pole shift events. Because many dates from ancient times
pertain to the Middle East generally, and to Jerusalem in particular, let’s
consider first of all Jerusalem:
Re
the pole shift in Hezekiah’s 15th year of reign [In the year
beginning Tishri 22, 699 BCE:]
The
geographical coordinates of Jerusalem are as follows:
Current: 31º 47’N 35º 13’E
Pre-Hezekiah’s
15th year of reign: 14º 11’ S
37º 13’ W
At
the time of a pole shift some locations will experience a longer day or night
than usual, while other locations will experience a shorter day or night than
usual. However, at the hub of the pole shift the length of day and night will
remain unchanged. It follows that, relative to Julian Day reckoning, the dates
indicated on records from places located at the hub of a pole shift are largely
unaffected by that pole shift. The same will be true for the timing of any event
that is directly based upon observations of celestial events such as sunset,
sunrise, new moon, solar eclipse, lunar eclipse, etc.. It also follows that,
relative to Julian Day reckoning, places experiencing a shorter or longer day
or night than usual will have to add or subtract time accordingly. That is, the dates indicated on records from
places located at such places, and the dates associated with celestial events
of such places, will need to add time if they experienced a shorter day or
night than usual, and they will need to subtract time if they experienced a
longer day or night than usual. This may seem simple and obvious enough, but
there may be complications requiring clear definitions. For instance, re the
date inscribed on an ancient record relative to the Julian Day reckoning, if we
know what celestial event that defined the beginning of a certain date, then
the correction may be added or subtracted as necessary. Notice however, that,
if either noon or midnight is being used for defining the beginning of the new
date, then that point in time, noon or midnight, would necessarily be placed
much closer to, or else much longer from, sunset and sunrise than usual, and,
without the use of artificial means for reckoning time during that pole shift
event, i.e. without a clock etc., it would be impossible to know whether time
was gained or lost relative to Julian Day reckoning. Indeed, for people
experiencing such a pole shift during the dark of the night while they were
asleep, they might not even have been noticing anything at all other than the
fact that their night may have seemed longer or shorter than usual before
sunrise and before the time of rising out of bed. They might think nothing of
that, especially while noticing that the new day suddenly brought new and
strange things such as the sun rising from the opposite horizon than formerly,
etc..
From
the above it should be obvious that, as soon as we can identify the exact
events associated with a pole shift, that is, relative to time and place, then we
may also correctly deduce whether and how much time to add to, or else subtract
from, any given historical date in order to correlate it to the Julian Day
reckoning.
Thus,
if we know for a certain locality, e.g. Jerusalem, its correct geographical
coordinates before and after any given pole shift, and if we know also
something about a day or night being longer or shorter than usual during that
event, then we may conclude also the proper correction relative to Julian Day
reckoning. For instance, re the event in King Hezekiah’s 15 year of reign: The
sun stopped and reversed its path at the 10th hour of day [between
3PM and 4PM] and, accordingly, the shadow on Ahaz’s sundial had to traverse the
beginning marks of 10 specified hours before traversing across the same 10
marks once again during one and the same day. Obviously that day was longer
than usual as observed from that location on Earth. Recognizing also that, per
the above, the location of Jerusalem changed from a location 37º W to a
location 32º E, I find a time zone difference of 4 hours and 34 minutes for
that one location. That is, due to its change in location, Jerusalem, if you
will, had to travel, in effect, that same distance, between 37º W and 32º E,
twice during the time of that pole shift. In addition to that, there would have
been a difference in the length of day before and after the pole shift that was
due to the change of latitude and depending upon which time of the year it was,
that is, depending upon the length of time between the pole shift and either
spring or fall equinox. Indeed, these time differences would constitute the
total of the added length of that long day in the 15th year of King
Hezekiah.
The
same line of reasoning would hold true also for the long day of Joshua, that
is, provided the long day of Joshua did not include also a bypass of the night
by means of traveling on the polar side of the sun’s shadow during the hours of
night...
Conclusions from the above:
Nevertheless,
it is quite clear that Jerusalem is not now located along the same longitude
and within the same time zone relative to the core of the Earth and relative to
Julian days before that last pole shift. In consequence, it is clear to me that
Scripture time is not reckoned relative to the motion of the core of Earth,
to any particular location within the core of Earth, nor to any artificially
designed time clock, be such clock ever so exact in its measurement of
absolute time. No, the location associated with the one and only definition of
calendar time that remains is that which may seem to be associated with
Jerusalem, but which is, or so it seems, none other than the throne of God,
that is, the definition that remains is that which is determined, for
the people of Israel during the Exodus, when to move and when to remain put,
that is, the location of the Ark of the Covenant.
The
one question that remains is this: How does Scripture time relate to Julian
Days, and to what extent was there a change at any one pole shift?
But
part and parcel of that one question is also this: To what extent must our
understanding of a timed celestial event recorded upon an ancient document be
modified or corrected when such a record is known to have occurred beyond one
or more pole shifts? I believe the answer is simply to recognize the
differences between the
before and after pole shift locations, and to apply such different
parameters as are being defined by such different locations in terms of
geographical coordinates.
To
be sure, I see nothing to indicate that there would have been any change in
the reckoning of the days of the week relative to the Julian Day reckoning,
that is, so far as concerns the pole shift in the 15th year of King
Hezekiah. Nevertheless, the pre-Hezekiah Scripture days should be recognized as
beginning somewhat earlier (a few hours) on the Julian Day calendar than the
post-Hezekiah Scripture days do. With the exception (cf. my computer
simulation of said pole shift!) of Portugal, Morocco, North and North-East
South America, North-America, Australia, and Indonesia, all of which
experienced an extra very brief day and night during the 24 hours of the pole
shift, I believe no additional correction is necessary other than that which is
due to their respective before and after pole shift geographical coordinates.
If any ancient dated records are found from Portugal, Morocco, North and
North-East South America, North-America, Australia, or Indonesia (excluding New
Zeeland and most of the Pacific Ocean; cf. this
computer simulation,) it could be that such records would be dated one day
in advance of the remainder of the world, but I am not aware, at this point, of
any such dated records. Perhaps someone is? To put it differently, records from
said areas could potentially indicate Saturday where the records of the
remainder of the world were only indicating Friday. Accordingly, this is not
an instance of potential support for the keeping of Sunday as a day of Sabbath
rest!
Accordingly,
at this date (5924[(*??*)] 12 04 2028
[2012-03-27]) I
find confirmation for my
findings re Saul’s visit with the woman at Endor on March 23, 1023 BCE,
that is, the day prior to the day he died. That result, including its use as a
bridge between early and late Scripture chronology (between the death of
Solomon and King Nebuchadnezzar) should remain unaffected by any findings
related to any pole shift prior to King Saul’s time.
Diagrams showing some particulars re the nature of the
above referenced pole shifts:
Here follows a few overviews of the entire process:
Please notice that these diagrams reflect values along the line of polar
motion, that is, along the line of maximum motion of the Earth. For other
locations upon the planet, closer to the nave, or hub, of motion, these numbers
should be modified accordingly.
Also please notice that, during a pole shift, the waters of the oceans are
largely staying put in their original positions relative to the core of the
planet. That is, the atmosphere and the oceans will shift their position
relative to the moving crust of the Earth, while the greater portions of all
land areas upon the Earth are experiencing extreme tides in the form of
horrific tsunami waves and winds speeding across the greater portions of most
continents as indicated by the diagrams below:
Diagrams for assessing the timing (that is, the time of potential
arrival) and speed of a tsunami wave at any given location x kilometers from an
oncoming ocean etc.:
Details of the above diagrams showing
the events as they
likely proceed during the first eight hours or so following the very first –
probably barely noticeable – beginnings of a pole shift. I am thinking in terms
of applying the data below largely for any given location relative to the coast
line of an ocean located in the direction of local travel in consequence of a
pole shift:
To get an idea of the size of the acceleration associated with
a pole shift, the following diagram is provided. For comparison, please note
that the force of gravity is 9.81 meters/sec.sq.. That is, the accelaration, or
G-force, associated with a polar shift, such as within described, is no more
than about 0.00189 / 9.81 = 0.0001929 G or 0.02% of the force of gravity. It
will require somewhat sensible instruments to notice such a subtle
acceleration. Perhaps a pendulum type instrument. However, a simple pendulum
would be expected to swing no more than about 0.19 mm for each meter
of the pendulum’s length. Perhaps a GPS would be a more easily accessible
instrument for measuring the
beginnings of pole shift (cf. e.g. “Recent
Crustal Movements and Deformations[11]
by W. Augath?) That is, provided there is no built in mechanism in the GPS system to
correct for the Chandler Wobble of the Earth on a real time basis? Cf. this
link for the short term and this one for the more long
term observations…
Perhaps the following two diagrams
will be helpful for assessing the strength of the pole shift acceleration, that is, in terms of
the force of gravity. The first of the following two diagrams could be helpful
for designing an instrument for detecting the first beginnings of a pole shift.
It may also be used for assessing the induced slant of any body of water,
whether a bath tub, a nearby lake, or a major ocean. The latter will be the
force behind any oncoming tsunami that might traverse across even the largest
continent… That is, 19.3 centimeter for every 1 km of water surface, or 1.93 km
for every 10,000 km of open ocean along the line of travel! The good news is
that those numbers may be cut in half because the water level at the coast line
on the distant side of said ocean will be lowered by as much. Thus, as a rule
of thumb, the sea level on the receiving end of an ocean would rise up to
around 100 meter for every 1,000 km width of the ocean... Furthermore, there
should be a certain amount of delay, or moderation, of such results. Perhaps if
you think rather of the oncoming ocean in terms of a river running downhill
from a higher location to a lower location at that certain distance, if you see
what I mean? Yet, the speed of the
stream will be considerable… And indeed, the speed and the buildup of
momentum may easily make up for the relatively low inclination of that river of
an ocean… It just might be valuable to think ahead… and to make some plans… No
doubt, if you pray about it, our Savior and Creator will share some good ideas
with you! For the benefit of either you or else for a later generation!:
This
second diagram might be helpful for assessing the time before the tsunami wave
will begin losing the brunt of its force. But please notice that by the time
the acceleration begins to wane there will be a considerable buildup of speed
and momentum…:
The next three diagrams shows the
distance of the pole shift movement relative to the main mass of the Earth (i.e. the core)
underneath. These first two diagrams may help you properly set your GPS type
alarm apparatus. Software for that purpose is widely available for
free on the internet. At least if you already have an Android type phone…
And an Anchor
Alarm would probably serve such purposes even better…
Here
is yet another diagram showing the first seven hours of that same pole shift movement.
(Cf. a similar diagram above and the numbers used:
Comments and donations freely
accepted at:
Please notice: Whenever you send
us something by snail mail, please notify us also by email, such that we will
know that there is something for us to pick up at the post office!
Tree of Life©
c/o General
Delivery
Nora [near SE-713
01]
Sweden Republic©
in Adamah Republic©
eMail: TreeOfLifeTime@gmail.com
…
The GateWays into Tree
of Life Chronology Forums©
The GateWays
into Tree of Life Chronology©
The
GateWays of Entry into the Tree of Life Time Chronology Touching upon the Book
of Daniel©
Pearls
& Mannah – “I found it!”
Feel free to use,
and for sharing freely with others, any of the truth and blessings belonging to
God alone. I retain all the copyrights to the within, such that no one may
lawfully restrain my use and my sharing of it with others. Including also all
the errors that remain. Please let only me know about those. I need to know in
order to correct them. Others don’t need to be focused upon the errors that
belong to me alone. Please respect that, and please do not hesitate to let me
know of any certain error that you find!
Without recourse.
All Rights Reserved. Tree of Life©
[1] Thanks Lasse &
Maggan!
[2] My initial date
for Joshua’s Long Day had to be revised for a number of reasons: For instance,
August 3-5, 1423 BCE turned out not to be a viable date because 1) that year is
not a Sabbatical year as required per Joshua 8:34 and Deuteronomy 31:10-12, and
2) that date does not seem to meet the Book of Jasher 88:64 criteria re the 36
hour long day. (That date is however more than 1 year past the crossing of the
Jordan, which took place at Passover 1424 BCE, and also it seems to provide its
own reason for that day being a very extended day...)
[3] My friend read this passage to me on or about
“2012-02-22.” My pole shift studies began following my daughter’s questions to
me in the spring of 2011 and shortly after her visit in Japan at the time of
the March 11, 2011 earthquake and tsunami. Cf. also footnote #6!
[4] We must always be alert to what is truth and
what is not – even when and if it is a matter of extra-terrestrial sources (cf.
also the last message at the bottom of this link!)
For instance, I am not convinced that the remainder of this footnoted paragraph
of Adamski is consistent with the intent of the words of the original Holy
Writ. It seems to me quite clear that Adamski’s words are a reference to
Genesis 2:6, “there
went up a mist from the earth…,” and the long life span of the pre-Flood
people. In contradistinction, the last three pole shifts all took place
subsequent to Noah’s Flood, while certainly not associated with an extension of
man’s life span. The remainder of Adamski’s paragraph reads as follows:
“For
years to come, this water-soaked soil will be in a process of evaporation which
will once more cause a constant cloudy formation, or ‘firmament’ around your Earth.
In which case, the life span will again be increased, and if the peoples on
your planet learn to live according to the Creator’s laws, you too can attain a
thousand years in the one body.”
[5] George Adamski, Inside
the Space Ships (London 1956.)
[6] 5924[(*??*)] 06
24 2028 [2012-10-10:] On this date, after
receiving an email from said friend of mine and
after belatedly being able to find the passage from which my friend read to me
on or about “2012-02-22,” I added the quote from George Adamski’s book.
[7] Intermediate edit 5938[v2016-12-14-21:32] 04 25 2035
[2019-06-30:] Reviewing
my Excel-files named “Itinerary_for_Jerusalems_during_Joshuas_long_day.xls”
through “Itinerary_for_Jerusalems_during_Joshuas_long_day-v.7.0.xls,” I
discover that
1. all of those
files are dated in 2012;
2. the original
version through v.3 were considering the full Moon dated Aug 5, 1423 BCE, at
04:02 UT;
3. v4 & v4a
were considering the full Moon dated March 30, 1422 BCE at 05:43 UT;
4. v5 was
considering the full Moon dated June 26, 1422 BCE at 03:22 UT;
5. v6 (all) &
v7 were considering the full Moon dated June 14, 1421 BCE at 20:07 UT; and
6. no attempt to
consider the full Moon dated July 3, 1420 BCE at 20:07 UT. (All dates from astropixels.com)
Having
discovered that all said dates are placed in a range of years 7 years too late
relative to my most recent calendar reckoning, and not being convinced as yet
as to how to understand the Joshua and Jasher records in terms of Joshua’s Long
Day occurring near the beginning or else near the end of the five years
referenced per Jasher 89:54-90:1, I cannot certainly commit myself as yet to
which of the years 1431 BCE (accession year) through 1426 (the 5th
year) is the correct one.
However,
to satisfy all of the criteria provided in Joshua and Jasher, I believe that it
is most likely necessary for Joshua’s Long Day to coincide with an astronomical
full Moon coinciding as near as possible with Jerusalem passing its closest
point to the pole along its route to a new set of geographical coordinates. In
so doing the Moon would be visible in the Jerusalem area before sunset on the
evening prior to astronomical full Moon, and still visible after sunrise the
following morning. That is, while from the point of the observer, Joshua’s
words being true to the facts:
“Sun, stand thou still upon Gibeon; and thou,
Moon, in the valley of Ajalon” Joshua 10:12.
In
v.7 of “Itinerary_for_Jerusalems_during_Joshuas_long_day-v.7.0.xls” said
criteria are being satisfied. That is:
1. The full Moon
of June 14, 1421 BCE 20:04 UT occurred for the Jerusalem area at 22:20 local
time and at 52.98 N 50.09 E, 18 minutes
after passing…
2. the
northernmost point of its itinerary at 22:02 local time (18:00 UT) and at 53.4
N 60.6 E.
I do
not know to what extent, if at all, forces existed that were not perfectly
aligned with the one main movement from the beginning to the end of this poleshift.
But, in addition to the off-center land ice of both poles (which I believe is
the greatest force involved,) I believe that a large enough asteroid or comet
colliding with the Earth; a complete reversal of the magnetic North Pole;
and/or other factors may have been involved; possibly even artificial man-made
interference such as planetary wide electro-magnetic power generators such as
may be evidenced by the pyramids all around our planet, and by other ancient
artifacts such as those visible on a grand scale not only in the South African
region.
Additional
criteria given by the Jasher & Joshua records consist of:
1. Jerusalem
passing the equator the following noon; and
2. The apparent
stand of the Sun and of the Moon over the horizons defined as:
“Sun, stand thou still upon Gibeon; and thou,
Moon, in the valley of Ajalon” Joshua 10:12.
Apparently
those additional criteria were also being met in v7 of said file…
The
question then is this: Which of the near midsummer full Moons of 1431 BCE
through 1426 provide a similar scenario such as may satisfy all given
criteria?:
1. 1431 BCE: June 5 at 19:44 UT—Before sabbatical year…;
2. 1430 BCE: June 24 at 19:44 UT—
Before sabbatical year…;
3. 1429 BCE: July 12 at 19:51 UT—
Before sabbatical year…;
4. 1428 BCE: July 31 at 20:07 UT—Before sabbatical year’s end…;
5. 1427 BCE: June 21 at 21:57 UT—2 hrs late?;
6. 1426 BCE: July 10 at 16:11 UT—4 hrs early?;
Making
additional Itinerary Excel-files for each of the above years, may be helpful in
ruling in or out some of the above years. If at that time item #5 or #6 above
turns out to be possible after all, then I would find one of those two years
being an attractive solution in that it allows for an orderly record also in re
to the Sabbatical year evidenced by Joshua 8:34-35 (More on that in footnote #8
below!) If not, then I am inclined to favor item #1 above, or possibly
#2.
Be
that as it may, it seems obvious that the criteria given by the Joshua and
Jasher records do agree with, and indicate, that a poleshift occurred in one of
the years 1431 BCE through 1426 BCE.
[8] I do not find the Book of Joshua
and the Book of Jasher being entirely clear re the exact year within which one of
the five years following the crossing of the Jordan Joshua’s Long Day occurred.
Did Joshua’s Long day occur:
1. In the same
year (1431 BCE) as the crossing of Jordan as suggested by one’s likely first
impression of the record given us in the books of Joshua and Jasher (and if so
also prior to the Sabbatical year (1429/1428 BCE) evidenced by the reading of
the law at the end of the year reported in Joshua 8:34. That is, are the
recorded events in the book of Joshua out of order?; or are my dates for those
years in error?...) or what else may I have misunderstood?
2. In one of the
two years (near the midsummer solstice of either 1427 or 1426 BCE) following
said Sabbatical year (1429/1428 BCE.) That is, in either the 4th or
5th of the five years identified per the record given us per Jasher
89:54-90:1? In one sense this last alternative would make more sense, and if
so: Is the key to such an understanding found in a slightly different
translation of Jasher 89:29??? Seems possible, yet not entirely convincing in and
of itself alone. Yet, with the added power of astronomy as compared with these
options…?:
Jasher 89:29 TLT And thus went Joshua—and all the people that were with him—on that day
towards Makkedah [i.e. The beginning of a summary of all events, some of which were
previously highlighted in the preceeding record of Joshua and Jasher:] And he smote it with the edge of
the sword…
Jasher 89:29 Davar4 And Joshua went afterward with all the people that were with him on
that day to Makkedah, and he smote it with the edge of the sword.
— One
basis for tying Joshua’s Long Day to 1426 BCE date is that this event took
place after (not within or before) the Sabbatical year indicated per Joshua
8:34-35. That is, based upon the order of events as recorded in the Book of Joshua,
and more specifically, following the event recorded in Joshua 8:34. A 1426 BCE
poleshift agrees well with 1429/1428 BCE being a Sabbatical year.
(King
Josia’s 18th year of reign, and the reading of the law in that year,
took place also in a Sabbatical year (610/609 BCE=Anno Mundi 3311; 2 Kings
23:2; 2 Chron 34:30.) The reading of the law within King Josia’s 18th
year of reign occurred at the end of that Sabbatical year.
Likewise
a poleshift associated with the July 10, 1426 BCE full Moon would be an event
after reading the law at the Feast of Tabernacles in 1428 BCE. Seeing that
these are the order of events as recorded in the Book of Joshua, I find that
the Long Day of Joshua must be placed no later than at the end of the five years of
war with the Canaanite kings referenced by Book of Jasher 89:54; 90:1 (i.e. no later than Tishri 21, 1426
BCE,) and definitely following the fall of Jericho in the second month of 1431
BCE. And possibly also following the reading of the law in the seventh month
1428 BCE. That is, near the midsummer solstice of either 1427 BCE or 1426 BCE
(More on that under footnote #7 above! Including also some most interesting
correlations re 1429 BCE!)
Further considerations are found also in the footnote
of my Itinerary_for_Jerusalems_during_Joshuas_long_day-v.7.0.xls…
Considering also such possible contribution (to
this poleshift) of uncertain forces initiating and driving this poleshift as
not only 1) a cometary or asteroid collision; but also 2) a reversal of Earth’s
magnetic field as indicated on any compass needle vs. the permanent magnetic
field frozen into Earth’s crust alone…
Deferring Joshua’s Long Day until the latter
portion of the year 1427/1426 could make the battle at the time of Joshua’s
Long Day the final and deciding battle in the war with the Canaanite kings. An
additional hint to that effect could be seen also in the Hebrew word ‘shanah’
of Book of Jasher 89:54-90:1. That is, while considering also that the Hebrew
word “shanah” meaning “cut-off” is primarily a reference to “the harvest times”
towards the cut-off of the year!
It should be noted also that although my
understanding re Biblical references to the public reading of the law at the
end of a Sabbatical year fits my current understanding of 2 Kings 22:8 and my
current chronology, there are at least two other Bible passages that do not:
Nehemiah 8 & 9; Acts 13:15! Cf. this blog entry
of mine!
This footnote was extensively
edited on 5938[v2016-12-14-21:32] 04 26 2035
[2019-07-01] – More specifics re the date of the crossing of Jordan under this
link, this
link, and this
link.
[9] From the time of the crossing of
Jordan and for some time thereafter Gilgal served as Joshua’s base camp. Gilgal
is at this time commonly identified as located at 32.03 N 35.48 E, that is 17km NNE from Jericho at an
altitude of: ‑230m; at the time zone: +2.3hrs relative Greenwich and
standard UT.
As
such Gilgal is almost certainly placed too far from Jericho. Considering the
distances and the intermediate altitude of the landscape, I’d suggest a more
likely location for the sky watching of Joshua being located in the hills about
5km NNW from Jericho. Consider please, the words “eastern edge of Jericho”
Jasher 88:10!
Thus,
when setting my SNB astronomy software, I may use the following specifications
re Pre-Joshua’s Long Day: SNB Gilgal
(flat) horizon east of Jericho at ~47.72 N ~100.04 E; altitude: -100 meters ;
Time zone: +6.6 hrs. For instance:
1. SNB Gilgal
horizon (Julian Day calendar date:) May 24, 1431 BCE Sunset: 19:14:06; Moonset: 20:56:08; Lag: 102 min 02 sec.; Illum.:
3.88% è Full Moon of Wed June 5, 1431 BCE at 19:44 UT = Near the beginning of Day Three of the week,
Iyar/Sivan 13, 1431 BCE—Not Iyar in the same year as Jericho and Ai!;
cf. Jasher 88:14 (The 7 days of encircling Jericho began on Iyar 1, 1431 BCE!)—Before the sabbatical year of Jos 8:34;
2. SNB Gilgal
horizon (Julian Day calendar
date:) June 11, 1430 BCE Sunset: 19:35:29;
Moonset: 20:20:29; Lag: 45 min 00 sec.; Illum.: 1.80% è Full Moon of Tue
June 24, 1430 BCE at
19:44 UT = Near the beginning of Day Two of the week,
Iyar/Sivan/Tammuz 14, 1430 BCE—Before the sabbatical
year of Jos 8:34;
3. SNB Gilgal
horizon (Julian Day calendar date:) June 29, 1429 BCE Sunset: 19:51:04; Moonset: 20:35:15; Lag: 44 min 11
sec.; Illum.: 2.87% è Full Moon of Mon July 12, 1429 BCE at 19:44 UT = Near the beginning
of Day One of the week, Iyar/Sivan/Tammuz 14, 1429 BCE—Before the sabbatical year of Jos 8:34;
4. SNB Gilgal
horizon (Julian Day calendar date:) July 18, 1428 BCE Sunset: 19:53:35; Moonset: 20:44:51; Lag: 51 min 16
sec.; Illum.: 3.95% è Full Moon of Sun July 31, 1428 BCE at 20:07 UT = Near the beginning of Day Seven of the week,
Tammuz/Av 14, 1428 BCE—Before the end of the sabbatical
year of Jos 8:34;
5. SNB Gilgal
horizon (Julian Day calendar date:) June 7, 1427 BCE Sunset: 19:31:19; Moonset: 20:14:34; Lag: 43 min 15
sec.; Illum.: 1.65% è Full Moon of Wed June 21, 1427 BCE at 21:57 UT = Near the beginning of
Day Three of the week, Iyar/Sivan/Tammuz 15, 1427 BCE—2 hrs too late?;
6. SNB Gilgal
horizon (Julian Day calendar date:) June 26, 1426 BCE Sunset: 19:48:49; Moonset: 20:37:49; Lag: 49 min 00
sec.; Illum.: 1.80% è Full Moon of Tue July 10, 1426 BCE at 16:11 UT = Near the beginning of
Day Two of the week, Sivan/Tammuz 15, 1426 BCE—4
hrs too early?
If Joshua read the law during the Feast of Tabernacles at the end of the
year preceding the Sabbatical year, that is, at the earliest beginnings of the
Sabbatical year… Remember the Hebrew and Scriptural time concept of days and
months and years overlapping one another, as in the links of a chain!—A most interesting correlation
indeed!; or else if Josephus’ reckoning of Sabbatical years would be correct,
then items #3 and #4 provide some interesting correlations re Joshua’s words
per Joshua 10:12, re the Sun and the Moon vs. the Sabbath hours at the
beginning of either Day One or else Day Seven of the week.
[10] Cf. footnote #8!
[11] NATIONAL
REPORT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY ON THE GEODETIC ACTIVITIES IN THE
YEARS 1995 B 1999, Section 5: Geodynamics, p. 97.