Without recourse. All Rights Reserved. Tree of Life©
Statement of belief: “Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word
is truth.” (John 17:17 KJV)
Created 5941[(?)]13 25 2027 [2011-04-29]
Last edited 5941[(?)]01 04 2027 [2011-05-08]
Pertinax’s Total Solar
Eclipse
February 19, 174 CE…?
Abstract:
I am by no means certain of which total solar eclipse that corresponds
to Pertinax’s total solar eclipse.
Yet, given all the facts of the matter and considering all the
circumstances that I am presently aware of, I suspect that I may well be
correct in concluding that the February 19, 174 CE total solar eclipse is
indeed Pertinax’s total solar eclipse…
Perhaps, if I ever get to it, I’ll find further confirmation, one way or
the other, once I pursue my studies of the emperors this side of Domitian,
Nerva, and Trajan. Nevertheless, the February 19, 174 CE total solar eclipse,
if that is it, does make the reign of Pertinax fall perfectly in line with my
prior discoveries re said emperors.
The February 19, 174 CE total solar eclipse is also the one and only
total eclipse that was visible from anywhere near Rome. To find the second
runner up distance wise one would have to go to 237 CE, which I believe is 44
years off in the wrong direction, that is, reckoning from the conventional 193
CE date.
Furthermore, and considering the very great errors inherent in
conventional ancient chronology, I believe it is entirely possible that said
February 19, 174 CE total solar eclipse may well have been observed even within
Rome itself...
In saying that I wish to emphasize that, in addition to the east-west
errors inherent in the uncertainty of the Delta-T values (cf. Fred Espenak and
Jean Meeus, Five
Millennium Canon of Solar Eclipses, pp. iii-iv (preface,) and pp. 7-9
(Section 1.6 Map Accuracy,)) there may be north-south errors that may not have
been accounted for, or at least I haven’t as yet become aware of such. For
instance, 1) I am thinking of the Chandler
Wobble of the axis of the Earth and of the north and south poles, which
were discovered and identified by Seth Carlo Chandler (1846-1913) (cf. Encyclopedia
Britannica (cache)
and Svensk Uppslagsbok
(1932) Chandler;
cf. Chandler wobble
and Seth Carlo
Chandler at Wikipedia) but which may be too small (<20 meters as
recorded for 1900-1912
and for Jan
1, 2005 – May 5, 2011; cf. Polar motion at Wikipedia)
to make a difference for the purposes of the solar eclipse paths, and 2) I am
also thinking in terms of the slowing down of the speed of light (cf. this
diagram re Atomic
Time vs. Solar Time, this diagram showing the measured changes
of the speed of light!, and this diagram showing the more dramatic changes
(since about 2,345 BCE) of the Obliquity
of the Ecliptic) as described by Trevor Norman and Barry Setterfield in their research
report entitled The Atomic Constants, Light, and Time, published at Stanford
Research Institute International (August 1987) and its companion publication
Geological Time and Scriptural Chronology.
Praise the Lord of Hosts for teaching me many things along the way!
Quoting from Historia
Augusta, The Life of Pertinax:
“4…
8… He [Pertinax / ToL©] was made emperor on the day before the Kalends of
January, being then more than sixty years old.[1]”
“14… 3, And on the day before
he died [= Mar 27] stars of great brilliancy were seen near the sun in the
day-time…”
“15… 6 He was born on the Kalends of August
in the consulship of Verus and Ambibulus
[126 AD conv / ToL], and was killed on the fifth day before the Kalends of April [=Mar
28; cf. F.R. Stephenson, Historical Eclipses
and Earth’s Rotation, p. 380]
in the consulship of Falco and Clarus [193 AD conv / ToL]. He lived sixty years, seven months and twenty-six
days, 7 and reigned for two months and twenty-five days.”
(Historia Augusta, The Life of Pertinax)
“4…
7… denique a paucis
primum est Pertinax imperator appellatus. 8 factus est autem sexagenario
maior imperator pridie kal. Ian.”
“14… 3 et cum apud Lares sacrificaret,
carbones vivacissimi exstincti sunt, cum inflammari soleant. et, ut supra
dictum est, cor et caput in hostiis non est repertum. stellae etiam iuxta solem per diem clarissimae visae ante
diem quam obiret.
“15… 6 Natus autem kal. Augustis Vero et
Ambibulo consulibus. interfectus est V kal.
Apr. Falcone et Claro consulibus.
vixit annis LX mensibus VII diebus XXVI. imperavit
mensibus II diebus XXV. 7 congiarium dedit populo denarios
centenos. praetorianis promisit duodena milia nummum sed dedit sena. quod
exercitibus promissum est datum non est, quia mors eum praevenit. horruisse
autem illum imperium epistula docet, 8 quae vitae illius a Mario Maximo
apposita est. quam ego inserere ob nimiam longitudinem nolui.”
(Historia Augusta, Helvius Pertinax)
Click on the picture for an interactive map! Cf. this link!
This is the solar eclipse that I find being my most favored
candidate for being Pertinax’s total solar eclipse.
(But I am by no means certain!)
Click on the picture for an interactive map! Cf. this link!
This is the solar eclipse that I find being my second most
favored candidate for being Pertinax’s total solar eclipse.
(But I am by no means certain!)
Considerations:
It is obvious that given that “stars of great brilliancy were seen near the sun in the
day-time…” this was definitely a total solar eclipse. Unfortunately
we are not told the exact location for this observation. We cannot take it for
granted that the observation was made at Rome. It could have been anywhere
within the Roman Empire… And the date we are given, “the day before… the fifth
day before the Kalends of April [Mar 27,]” don’t seem to fit any certain solar
eclipse anywhere…
Not having any certain dates re this
century already arrived at from my earlier studies, and not being willing to
rely on the conventional dates (for instance as provided at Bill Thayer’s
website,) I was initially thinking that perhaps dating this event would be a
simple matter of confirming a correct conventional date… After all, this event
supposedly did take place a full century closer to our time than most of my
prior work! But, that was not to be…
At first I set out to make, out of the NASA
Phases of the Moon table, a list of all the solar eclipses (anywhere) that were
dated anywhere close to the quoted date above, that is, anywhere close to March
27th. I found the dates in the first table below. I then (cf. column
#5) identified, for each of those dates, the location of each corresponding
eclipse path. At first I found little of striking interest. No eclipses
anywhere near Rome. No eclipses fitting the ticket of being dated anywhere near
March 27. And no interesting eclipses anywhere near the year 193, which year is
the conventional year attributed to Pertinax’s death. (The Feb 19, 174 CE and
the Mar 11, 183 CE eclipses were added at a point later in my study…) As you
can see for yourself, I found only two eclipses dated March 27, but
unfortunately those were about 300 years off target (480-193=287 and
499-193=306) for a good fit! (Cf. the green boxes at the bottom of column #2 in
this table!:)
|
Comprehensive listing of all Solar Eclipses Within a Few Days of the
Date March 27 from 51 CE through 500 CE |
|||||
|
# |
Dated eclipse |
Year (CE) |
Type |
Location of eclipse path |
Comments |
|
1 |
30 Mar |
51 |
Total |
S. America |
|
|
2 |
30 Mar |
70 |
Total |
Central America |
|
|
3 |
30 Mar |
89 |
Hybrid |
N. America, Greenland, Iceland |
|
|
4 |
30 Mar |
108 |
Partial 0.4 |
Iceland |
|
|
5 |
31 Mar |
154 |
Annular |
S. America |
|
|
6 |
22 Mar |
163 |
Annular |
Antarctica |
|
|
7 |
31 Mar |
173 |
Partial 0.7 |
Antarctica |
|
|
8 |
174 |
Total |
Best fit! |
||
|
9 |
22 Mar |
182 |
Hybrid |
Australia |
|
|
10 |
183 |
Total |
Good fit! |
||
|
11 |
22 Mar |
201 |
Total |
Canada Pacific Indonesia |
|
|
12 |
22 Mar |
220 |
Partial 0.85 |
Siberia |
|
|
13 |
228 |
Total |
Possible options |
||
|
14 |
247 |
Total |
|||
|
15 |
24 Mar |
266 |
Annular |
Australia |
|
|
16 |
23 Mar |
285 |
Partial 0.7 |
Antarctica |
|
|
17 |
25 Mar |
293 |
Partial 0.88 |
Antarctica |
|
|
18 |
24 Mar |
312 |
Annular |
S. America |
|
|
19 |
25 Mar |
331 |
Annular |
Far East |
|
|
20 |
24 Mar |
350 |
Annular |
Canada |
|
|
21 |
26 Mar |
358 |
Partial 0.5 |
Arctic |
|
|
22 |
25 Mar |
377 |
Total |
N. America |
|
|
23 |
25 Mar |
396 |
Total |
S. America |
|
|
24 |
26 Mar |
415 |
Total |
S. America |
|
|
25 |
28 Mar |
423 |
Partial 0.78 |
Antarctica |
|
|
26 |
28 Mar |
442 |
Total |
Australia |
|
|
27 |
28 Mar |
461 |
Annular |
Pacific |
|
|
28 |
27 Mar |
480 |
Annular |
Iceland Greenland |
|
|
29 |
29 Mar |
488 |
Partial 0.4 |
Arctic |
|
|
30 |
27 Mar |
499 |
Partial 0.0158 |
East Siberia |
|
It is
clear from the above table that the year of Pertinax’s death cannot possibly
have been 193 CE as conventionally assumed. That is, provided only that 1) the
eclipse as recorded did indeed take place, and 2) that the NASA solar eclipse
calculations for this era are anywhere near the real time events.
It is
also clear from the above table that the date provided for Pertinax’s death, V.
Kal. April [March 28,] cannot possibly correspond precisely with the moderns
Julian or Gregorian calendar reckoning.
The
above given, I feel free to toy with both the year and the date. First of all I
expanded my search criteria as much as I felt was anywhere within reason. The
result was the
table below. By so doing I discovered a few additional options. However,
most of those additional options seem too farfetched for reasonable
consideration. Only two of those additional discoveries seemed worthy of
further consideration: February 19, 174 CE, and March 11, 183 CE.
Indeed,
I find some little support for March 11, 183 CE being a good candidate for
being Pertinax’s total solar eclipse:
1. Bringing the event from 193 to an earlier
point in time seems possibly more likely to agree with the stated age of
Pertinax at the time of his reign and at the time of his death. That is, “he lived sixty years, seven months and twenty-six days” (rather than 66 y/o as apparently required by conventional reckoning.)
2. Bringing the event from 193 to an earlier point
in time is more in line with my prior findings re the Roman Emperors of the 1st century.
3. One possible reason for the strange date, “V.
Kal. April [March 28,]”could be Commodus’ changes of the calendar of his time,
whatever they might have been besides that of renaming all twelve months of the
year:
“A new order (190–192)
“Perhaps seeing this as an opportunity,
early in 192 Commodus, declaring himself the new Romulus, ritually re-founded
Rome, renaming the city Colonia Lucia Annia Commodiana. All the months of
the year were renamed to correspond exactly with his (now twelve) names:
Lucius, Aelius, Aurelius, Commodus, Augustus, Herculeus, Romanus,
Exsuperatorius, Amazonius, Invictus, Felix, Pius. The legions were renamed Commodianae,
the fleet which imported grain from Africa was termed Alexandria Commodiana
Togata, the Senate was entitled the Commodian Fortunate Senate, his palace and
the Roman people themselves were all given the name Commodianus, and the day
on which these reforms were decreed was to be called Dies Commodianus.[6]
Thus he presented himself as the fountainhead of the Empire and Roman life and
religion. He also had the head of the Colossus of Nero adjacent to the
Colosseum replaced with his own portrait, gave it a club and placed a bronze
lion at its feet to make it look like Hercules, and added an inscription
boasting of being "the only left-handed fighter to conquer twelve times
one thousand men".[7]
…
“An inscribed altar from Dura-Europos on
the Euphrates shows that Commodus's titles and the renaming of the months
were disseminated to the furthest reaches of the Empire; moreover, that
even auxiliary military units received the title Commodiana, and that Commodus
claimed two additional titles: Pacator Orbis (pacifier of the world) and
Dominus Noster (Our Lord). The latter eventually would be used as a
conventional title by Roman Emperors, starting about a century later, but
Commodus seems to have been the first to assume it.[10]”
(Wikipedia: Commodus)
4. Considering the destruction of all things associated
with Commodus, is it any wonder if the proper reckoning of time was not
immediately restored to that which had formerly been?!!!:
The end of the reign (192)
Upon his death, the Senate declared him a
public enemy (a de facto damnatio memoriae) and restored the original name to
the city of Rome and its institutions. Commodus' statues were thrown down.
His body was buried in the Mausoleum of Hadrian.
(Wikipedia:
Commodus)
5. If indeed the March 11, 183 CE total solar eclipse
was the one referenced by the author of the original record behind Historia Augusta, The Life of Pertinax, and if indeed, at the time, the calendar being used did accurately
reflect the time of death of Pertinax and of said total solar eclipse, then I
find the following calendar correlations:
|
Correlations between our standard Julian
calendar and Pertinax’s calendar - as reflected by Historia Augusta, The
Life of Pertinax - if Pertinax’s solar eclipse was the March
11, 183 CE total solar eclipse |
||||
|
Julian calendar |
Pertinax’s calendar |
Comments |
||
|
XVII Kal. Feb |
Dec 16 |
Jan 1 |
Kal. Ian. |
|
|
XI Kal. Feb. |
Dec 22 Winter solstice |
Jan 7 |
VII Idus |
Winter solstice day [Cf. the seven day feast
of Ahasuerus!] |
|
|
Dec 31 |
Jan 16 |
|
|
|
|
Jan 1 |
Jan 17 |
|
|
|
|
Jan 15 |
Jan 31 |
|
|
|
|
Jan 16 |
Feb 1 |
Kal. Feb. |
|
|
|
Jan 31 |
Feb 16 |
|
|
|
|
Feb 1 |
Feb 17 |
|
|
|
|
Feb 12 |
Feb 28 |
|
|
|
|
Feb 13 |
Mar 1 |
Kal. Mar. |
|
|
|
Feb 28 |
Mar 16 |
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 |
Mar 17 |
|
|
|
|
Mar 11 |
Mar 27 |
|
Total solar eclipse in Britain |
|
|
Mar 12 |
Mar 28 |
V. Kal. Apr. |
Day of Pertinax’s death |
6. The fact that the March 11, 183 CE total solar eclipse
was seen from Britain, and thus from a place within the Roman Empire where
Pertinax had spent a portion of his working life, does add weight to this option,
albeit not quite as much as does the placement of the February 19, 174 CE total
solar eclipse path. Cf. item #6 below!
7. That’s all I can think of presently, that is, re
support for the March 11, 183 CE solar eclipse…
But what
about the Feb 19, 174 CE total solar eclipse? Yes, it is even further remote from
the conventional date of 193 AD, and yes, it is even further off from March 27,
but so what? Have we not already proven to our satisfaction that neither 193
AD, nor March 27 in terms of our standard Julian calendar are possible? I
believe we have! Thus, what points of support may we find?:
1. Same argument as #1 above holds true for this date
as well! Indeed, for Feb 19, 174 CE that argument becomes even stronger,
especially upon considering also the next item:
2. Same argument as #2 above holds true for this date
as well! Indeed, the difference between 193 CE and 174 CE is 19 years, which is
exactly the same difference as I have previously discovered
between the conventional dating of the Emperors Domitian, Nerva, and Trajan!
3. Same argument as #3 above exactly!
4. Same argument as #4 above!
5. Whereas March 11, 183 CE was associated
with a 16 day difference between the dates of the months, February 19, 174 CE
is associated with only an 8 day difference. Cf. #5 above!
6. The fact that the Feb 19, 174 CE solar eclipse path
covered southern Italy, not too far from Rome (the only one of its kind within
40 years before or after 193 CE,) adds considerable weight to this contender
for Pertinax’s solar eclipse. Indeed, I wouldn’t be surprised if, in the end,
it’ll be shown that the Feb 19, 174 CE total solar eclipse was visible even in
Rome itself! That is, once not only a the Delta-T is perfected for this time
and place, but also all other factors identified and corrected, for instance,
1) that of the wobbling of the axis of the Earth that would primarily affect
the north/south placement of the eclipse path, and 2) that which may have to do
with the slowing down of the speed of light as described by Trevor
Norman and Barry Setterfield in their research report entitled The Atomic
Constants, Light, and Time, published at Stanford Research Institute
International (August 1987.) Cf. item #6 above!
7. Thus I find the February 19, 174 CE solar
eclipse being the strongest contender for Pertinax’s solar eclipse, while the
March 11, 183 CE solar eclipse remains also a good second best candidate…
|
Legend: |
Comprehensive listing of all (finding 15 more
or less remote; cf. last column!) Solar Eclipses Possibly Visible from
Within the Roman Empire from 105 CE through 355 CE (The unnumbered items, 15+ & 18+,
were initially considered outside of the Roman Empire, but were added later) |
Legend: |
|||||
|
Not possible |
Not possible |
||||||
|
Possible |
Possible |
||||||
|
Good fit |
Good fit |
||||||
|
# |
Dated eclipse |
Year (CE) |
Type |
Location of potential observation post
within the Roman Empire |
Assessment |
||
|
1 |
25 Oct |
105 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
2 |
3 Aug |
110 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
3 |
1 Jun |
113 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
4 |
15 Nov |
114 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
5 |
3 Sep |
118 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
6 |
18 Jan |
120 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
7 |
2 Jul |
121 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
8 |
125 |
Hybrid Magn.: 1.003 |
More remote option |
||||
|
9 |
6 Feb |
129 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
10 |
12 Jun |
131 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
11 |
25 Nov |
132 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
12 |
134 |
Annular Magn.: 0.985 |
|
||||
|
13 |
28 Jan |
138 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
14 |
2 May |
143 |
Hybrid |
|
|
||
|
15 |
4 Sep |
145 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
15+ |
146 |
Hybrid Magn.: 0.998 |
More remote option |
||||
|
16 |
153 |
Annular Magn.: 0.953 |
|
||||
|
17 |
13 Jul |
158 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
18 |
4 Sep |
164 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
18+ |
165 |
Total Magn.: 1.023 |
More remote option |
||||
|
19 |
17 Dec |
168 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
20 |
5 Oct |
172 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
21 |
174 |
Magn.: 1.02 |
Best fit![2] |
||||
|
22 |
23 Jul |
176 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
23 |
183 |
Total Magn.: 1.019 |
Good fit! |
||||
|
24 |
14 Jul |
185 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
25 |
4 Jul |
186 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
26 |
28 Dec |
186 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
27 |
3 May |
189 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
28 |
193 |
Total Magn.: 1.022 |
More remote option |
||||
|
29 |
3 Jun |
197 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
30 |
7 Oct |
199 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
31 |
14 Jul |
204 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
32 |
14 May |
207 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
33 |
211 |
Total Magn.: 1.021 |
More remote option |
||||
|
34 |
14 Aug |
212 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
35 |
7 Oct |
218 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
36 |
19 Jan |
223 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
37 |
228 |
Total Magn.: 1.026 |
Possible option |
||||
|
38 |
25 Aug |
230 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
39 |
14 Jun |
234 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
40 |
237 |
Total Magn.: 1.026 |
More remote option |
||||
|
41 |
5 Aug |
240 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
42 |
29 Jan |
241 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
43 |
247 |
Total Magn.: 1.026 |
Possible option |
||||
|
44 |
16 Aug |
258 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
45 |
15 Jun |
261 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
46 |
4 Jun |
262 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
47 |
265 |
Total Magn.: 1.019 |
More remote option |
||||
|
48 |
16 Sep |
266 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
49 |
5 Jul |
270 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
50 |
8 Nov |
272 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
51 |
31 Jan |
287 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
52 |
15 May |
291 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
53 |
292 |
Total Magn.: 1.027 |
More remote option |
||||
|
54 |
294 |
Annular Magn.: 0.963 |
|
||||
|
55 |
7 Sep |
294 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
56 |
295 |
Annular Magn.: 0.97 |
Naples, Italy (near Rome) |
|
|||
|
57 |
301 |
Total Magn.: 1.023 |
Egypt |
More remote option |
|||
|
58 |
27 Sep |
303 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
59 |
10 Feb |
305 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
60 |
27 Jul |
306 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
61 |
17 Sep |
312 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
62 |
6 Jul |
316 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
63 |
31 Dec |
316 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
64 |
6 May |
319 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
65 |
18 Oct |
320 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
66 |
6 Aug |
324 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
67 |
11 Dec |
326 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
68 |
17 Jul |
334 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
69 |
11 Jan |
335 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
70 |
6 May |
338 |
Annular |
|
|
||
|
71 |
341 |
Hybrid Magn.: 0.999 |
More remote option |
||||
|
72 |
16 Jun |
345 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
73 |
6 Jun |
346 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
74 |
9 Oct |
348 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
75 |
349 |
Annular Magn.: 0.977 |
More remote option |
||||
|
76 |
28 May |
355 |
Total |
|
|
||
|
Notice This table was a flawed
attempt… A simple exclusion based upon
the UT time of the maximum eclipse as provided in NASA’s Phase of the Moon
Tables, as attempted in this table (cf. the red boxes!,) is irrelevant and cannot
be used by itself for excluding an event. Cf. the linked Google maps in the
last column! Comprehensive listing of all Solar Eclipses Within March and April from 107 CE through 295 CE |
|||||
|
# |
Dated eclipse |
Year (CE) |
Type |
Time of Maximum Eclipse (UT) |
|
|
1 |
Apr 11 |
107 |
H |
00:15 |
|
|
2 |
Mar 30 |
108 |
P |
06:45 |
|
|
3 |
Mar 31 |
116 |
A |
21:57 |
|
|
4 |
Mar 21 |
117 |
A |
02:19 |
|
|
5 |
Apr 21 |
125 |
H |
07:30 |
|
|
6 |
Apr 10 |
126 |
P |
13:40 |
|
|
7 |
Apr 12 |
134 |
A |
05:11 |
|
|
8 |
Apr 1 |
135 |
A |
09:17 |
|
|
9 |
Mar 20 |
136 |
A |
09:31 |
|
|
10 |
Apr 20 |
144 |
P |
20:27 |
|
|
11 |
Mar 11 |
145 |
A |
04:54 |
|
|
12 |
Apr 22 |
152 |
A |
12:16 |
|
|
13 |
Apr 11 |
153 |
A |
16:04 |
|
|
14 |
Mar 31 |
154 |
A |
16:27 |
|
|
15 |
Mar 20 |
155 |
P |
20:51 |
|
|
16 |
Mar 22 |
163 |
A |
12:03 |
|
|
17 |
Mar 10 |
164 |
A |
18:21 |
|
|
18 |
Apr 22 |
171 |
A |
22:45 |
|
|
19 |
Apr 10 |
172 |
A |
23:18 |
|
|
20 |
Mar 31 |
173 |
P |
04:13 |
|
|
21 |
Apr 1 |
181 |
P |
19:06 |
|
|
22 |
Mar 22 |
182 |
H |
01:59 |
|
|
23 |
183 |
T |
15:32 |
||
|
24 |
Apr 22 |
190 |
A |
06:01 |
|
|
25 |
Apr 11 |
191 |
P |
11:30 |
|
|
26 |
Mar 1 |
192 |
T |
15:00 |
|
|
27 |
Feb 19 |
193 |
T |
07:30 |
|
|
28 |
Apr 13 |
199 |
P |
02:02 |
|
|
29 |
Apr 1 |
200 |
H |
09:29 |
|
|
30 |
21 Mar |
201 |
T |
23:29 |
|
|
31 |
11 Mar |
202 |
P |
16:15 |
|
|
32 |
21 Apr |
209 |
P |
18:41 |
|
|
33 |
12 Mar |
210 |
T |
23:06 |
|
|
34 |
2 Mar |
211 |
T |
15:44 |
|
|
35 |
23 Apr |
217 |
P |
08:53 |
|
|
36 |
12 Apr |
218 |
T |
16:54 |
|
|
37 |
2 Apr |
219 |
T |
07:21 |
|
|
38 |
22 Mar |
220 |
P |
00:16 |
|
|
39 |
228 |
T |
07:07 |
||
|
40 |
12 Mar |
229 |
T |
23:50 |
|
|
41 |
2 Mar |
230 |
A |
13:06 |
|
|
42 |
23 Apr |
236 |
T |
00:14 |
|
|
43 |
12 Apr |
237 |
T |
15:04 |
|
|
44 |
2 Apr |
238 |
P |
08:09 |
|
|
45 |
3 Apr |
246 |
T |
14:59 |
|
|
46 |
247 |
T |
07:46 |
||
|
47 |
12 Mar |
248 |
A |
20:51 |
|
|
48 |
2 Mar |
249 |
P |
02:46 |
|
|
49 |
23 Apr |
255 |
T |
22:44 |
|
|
50 |
12 Apr |
256 |
T |
15:54 |
|
|
51 |
3 Mar |
257 |
A |
18:10 |
|
|
52 |
13 Apr |
264 |
P |
22:45 |
|
|
53 |
3 Apr |
265 |
T |
15:35 |
|
|
54 |
24 Mar |
266 |
A |
04:27 |
|
|
55 |
13 Mar |
267 |
P |
10:05 |
|
|
56 |
23 Apr |
274 |
T |
23:33 |
|
|
57 |
15 Mar |
275 |
A |
01:47 |
|
|
58 |
3 Mar |
276 |
A |
05:18 |
|
|
59 |
25 Apr |
282 |
P |
06:25 |
|
|
60 |
14 Apr |
283 |
T |
23:15 |
|
|
61 |
3 Apr |
284 |
A |
11:52 |
|
|
62 |
23 Mar |
285 |
P |
17:13 |
|
|
63 |
25 Mar |
293 |
P |
09:10 |
|
|
64 |
14 Mar |
294 |
A |
12:29 |
|
|
65 |
3 Mar |
295 |
A |
12:30 |
|
Comments and donations
freely accepted at:
Tree of Life©
c/o General Delivery
Nora [near SE-713 01]
eMail: TreeOfLifeTime@gmail.com
…
…
The GateWays into Tree of Life Chronology Forums©
The GateWays of Entry into the Tree of Life Time Chronology
Touching upon the Book of Daniel©
Pearls & Mannah – “I
found it!”
Feel free to use, and for sharing freely with others,
any of the truth and blessings belonging to God alone. I retain all the
copyrights to the within, such that no one may lawfully restrain my use and my
sharing of it with others. Including also all the errors that remain. Please
let only me know about those. I need to know in order to correct them. Others
don’t need to be focused upon the errors that belong to me alone. Please
respect that, and please do not hesitate to let me know of any certain error
that you find!
Without recourse. All Rights Reserved. Tree of Life©