Without recourse. All Rights Reserved. Tree of Life©
Statement of belief: “Sanctify them
through thy truth: thy word is truth.” (John 17:17 KJV)
Updated 5928± 10 06 2024 [2007-12-16]
Re the
Events Recorded in Acts 25:1-5:
When Did They
Transpire?
In
44 CE, or in 45 CE?
-
The Greek
Word “διετιας1333” Redefined
Abstract:
Based on Acts 25:1, 4, 6, and upon an insight re the
exact timing of events before and after, it is possible to conclude that Festus
arrived in Jerusalem at the Day of At-One-Ment,
Tishri 10, 44 CE [Wednesday October 21, 44 CE.]
Additionally, it is possible to arrive at a more
accurate definition of the Greek Word “διετια” as used twice only in the New Testament (Acts 24:27
and Acts 28:30.) Referring, as usual, to Strong’s numbers, my suggestion for a new
and more accurate definition of the word “διετια” is:
“From 1223, 2089, and 2094; through (διά) the remaining
(“yet” or “still”) part of the civil “year”
(έτος.)”
Armed with the above insights we may now conclude,
based upon Acts 24:27, that Festus replaced Felix at the beginning of
the civil year starting Tishri 1, 44 CE.
PS. The end point of the biblical year is Tishri 22,
however just as the 7th day of every week is the end of the week, so
also I believe that the entire 7th month along with all the God
ordained feast days therein are also considered the end of the year. Cf. this link!
Acts 25:1 TLT+
“Now3767
when Festus5347 was come into1910 the3588
province,1885
at the end of
3326 Day2250 Three5140 [of the week]
he ascended305 from575 Caesarea2542
to1519 Jerusalem.2414
Acts 25:1 KJV+ Now3767 when Festus5347
was come into1910 the3588 province,1885
after3326 three5140
days2250 he ascended305 from575
Caesarea2542 to1519 Jerusalem.2414
Act
25:2 KJV+
Then1161 the3588
high priest749 and2532 the3588
chief4413 of the3588 Jews2453
informed1718 him846 against2596
Paul,3972 and2532 besought3870
him,846
Act
25:3 KJV+ And desired154 favor5485
against2596 him,846 that3704
he would send for3343 him846 to1519
Jerusalem,2419 laying wait4160, 1747 in2596
the3588 way3598 to kill337
him.846
Act 25:4 KJV+
But3767 (3303) Festus5347
answered,611 that Paul3972
should be kept5083 at1722
Background and considerations:
1. 44 or 45?
Based
upon prior studies I have concluded
that the events recorded in Acts 25:1-10 transpired in either 44 CE or 45 CE.
But which of those two years is it?
2. The KJV rendition of Acts 24:27
“after two years” means something else…
It
may appear, based upon Acts 24:27 (KJV,) and also as based upon Strong’s
definition of the Greek word “διετιας1333,” that there was at least one year, possibly more than two years,
between the Pentecost of the events recorded in Acts 20:16 through Acts 23:33
on the one hand, and the arrival of Festus (Acts 24:27,) on the other. However,
the exact meaning of the Greek word “διετιας1333,” is subject to further analysis and based upon the study detail being
presented below, and upon a thorough analysis
of the word “διετιας1333” and related words as used in the New
Testament, I conclude that the Greek word “διετιας1333” does indeed have a different meaning than thus far assumed.
3. Festus visit to
The
record brought to us by Acts 25:4 makes it clear that after arriving in
4. “after three days” means “at the end
of the Third Day of the week”
I
have shown elsewhere
in these studies that unless otherwise required by the context and the grammar,
a rare event indeed, words translated “three days” in KJV are more accurately
translated “Day Three [of the week,]” as based upon Textus Receptus and upon
the events as they actually transpired. Accordingly…
The
words “after three days” as rendered in Acts 25:1 (KJV) are more accurately
translated “at [or after] the end of Day Three [of the week,]” [i.e. Tuesday
night after sunset.]
5. The “ten” referenced in Acts 25:6 references one of
three possible days
But I already found that the 10th
Day referenced in Acts 25:6 most likely references either Tuesday or Wednesday,
October 20 or 21, 44 CE, or else
6. Combining items 3, 4, and 5 above I can exclude two
item out of three possible
I
find that Tuesday October 20, 44 CE and Sunday October 10, 45 CE may be
excluded since the brief visit by Festus at the one day feast in Jerusalem, the
Day of Atonement, would not have been brief relative to this one day event had
Festus stayed in Jerusalem for almost one whole week (Tuesday night October 13
through Tuesday October 20, 44 CE) or even for five days (Tuesday night October
Sunday October 10, 45 CE.)
7. Accordingly I am left with the
conclusion that…
Festus arrived in Jerusalem on the
Fourth Day of the week, Tishri 10, 44 CE [Wednesday
8. But the above conclusion may be used
for giving the Greek word “διετια” a more
accurate definition
Considering
that the Greek word “διετιας:”
1.
Is found only twice in Textus Receptus;
2.
that Acts 24:27 is the first one of those two passages; and
3.
given that the events recorded in Acts 20:16 through Acts 23:33
occurred in Sivan, the Third Month, 44 CE, less than four months prior to the
beginning of the new civil year beginning Tishri 1, 44 CE; while considering
also
4.
the
prior analysis of the Greek word “διετιας”
I
find that the Greek word “διετιας” as the
word is rendered in Acts 25:6, must be redefined to agree with all the
known facts as above concluded upon what I believe is solid evidence:
1. Re the first part of the word: δι-
As
with all the other Greek words in the New Testament beginning with ‘διετ-‘ I believe it is safe to conclude that the first
letters of “διετιας,” a
grammatical form of “διετια,”
are based, not as previously presumed upon “δίς” (Strong’s
G1364,) but upon “διά” (Strong’s
G1223:)
G1223
διά
dia
dee-ah'
A
primary preposition denoting the channel of an act; through (in very
wide applications, local, causal or occasional). In composition it retains the
same general import: - after, always, among, at, to avoid, because of (that),
briefly, by, for (cause) . . . fore, from, in, by occasion of, of, by reason
of, for sake, that, thereby, therefore, X though, through (-out), to,
wherefore, with (-in). In composition it retains the same general import.
G1364
δίς
dis
dece
Adverb
from G1417; twice: - again, twice.
2. Re the second part of the word: -ετια
Considering
especially that:
1. Between the Pentecost in [the
Julian year] 44 CE and the Day of At-One-Ment in [the
Julian year] 44 CE there is, not any kind of twelve month year (only four
months,) but, beginning with Tishri 1, the completion of one civil year and the
beginning of the next civil year; and
2. considering also the qualifying
words used together with “διετιας,” “πληρωθεισης4137” (Acts 24:27,) and “ολην365” (Acts 28:30,)
I
find that the latter portion of “διετια” must be derived from “έτος”
(Strong’s G2094,) as correctly suggested by Strong’s G1332 and G1333, and not,
at least not primarily, to e.g. “έτι” meaning ”yet” or ”still” (Strong’s G2089.)
G2089
έτι
eti
et'-ee
Perhaps
akin to G2094; “yet”, still (of time or degree): - after that, also,
ever, (any) further, (t-) henceforth (more), hereafter, (any) longer, (any)
more (-one), now, still, yet.
G2094
έτος
etos
et'-os
Apparently
a primary word; a year: - year.
3. I suggest that a more accurate definition of the word “διετια” is:
From
1223, 2089, and 2094; through (διά) the remaining
(“yet” or “still”) part of the civil “year”
(έτος.)
9.
Armed with the above insights I conclude, based upon
Acts 24:27, that Festus replaced Felix at the beginning
of the civil year starting Tishri 1, 44 CE.
Comments and donations freely
accepted at:
Tree
of Life©
c/o
General Delivery
Nora
[near SE-713 01]
eMail: TreeOfLifeTime@gmail.com
Invitation to Tree of Life
Chronology Forums©:
You
are hereby warmly invited to join Tree of Life
Chronology Forums©
where the within historical paradigm and more is the focus of an ongoing
dialogue.
Please
come to Tree of Life Chronology Forums© and share your
valuable points of view such that we may all grow in knowledge and wisdom!
The GateWays
into Tree of Life Chronology Forums©
Without recourse. All Rights Reserved. Tree of Life©