Without recourse. All Rights Reserved. Tree of Life©
What part responsibility do I accept from my Redeemer
for creating a Seventh-day Adventist
community
characterized by free
speech
while seriously focusing upon, and growing
with, the truths discernible within the Word of God?
Statement of belief: “Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth.” (John 17:17
KJV)
Created 5928± 06 26 2024
[2008-9-27]
Updated 5941[(?)]
07 22 2027 [2010-10-31]
Updated 5925[(*??*)]
01 02 2029 [2013-04-13] – Added links (1, 2, 3) to my 4 Gospel Synopsis
Updated 5925[(*??*)]
01 06 2029 [2013-04-17] – Added a footnote re Strong’s G1207.
Updated 5925[(*??*)] 01 12 2029 [2013-04-21] –
Revised footnote re
Strong’s G1207.
Updated 5925[(*??*)]
04 04 2029 [2013-07-14] - Revised the last
two paragraphs re ’betwixt.’
Updated 5925[(*??*)] 04 05 2029 [2013-07-15] -
Revised footnote re
Strong’s G1207. Cf. prior version.
Updated 5925[(*??*)]
05 10 2029 [2013-08-18] – Added a reference
and links re the birth of Yeshua.
24 Courses of Priests and Levites
Facts and Considerations re the Timing of Each of
their
Abstract:
A firm dating of the course of Abijah
and the birth of John the Baptist (cf. 1,
2)
referenced in Luke 1:5, 23, re the birth of Yeshua, the Messiah (cf. 1,
2)
referenced in Luke 1:26-33, and re the plucking of grain by Yeshua
and his disciples on the Second-First Shabbat (cf. 1,
2)
referenced in Luke 6:1 has now been established.
For instance, I have found
a firm date for the beginning of the 1st course of priestly
temple services such that all questions re how the three annual Feasts were
being handled are seemingly now being naturally resolved without recourse to
any delay or complication as to the numbering of the priestly eight day cycles
of service.
. . . . . . .
Although it has been for me a
long and winding road before arriving at this certain point of my
discoveries, I believe the simple and straightforward answers to each and all
questions re the timing of the 24 courses of priests and Levites serving the
temple throughout the year, are as follows:
The month given the name “the First Moon,” i.e. Aviv,
as in the Hebrew word ‘rishon,’ meaning ‘foremost,’
is the month being used for tuning each and every year to the seasons, and
without fail. It is the focal point of the Scripture year, the month in the
very middle of the year, with six month before since the beginning of the year
and with six months behind unto the end of the year. It stands to reason that
“the First Course” is the one beginning in the month with the same name, “the
first month.”[1]
The focal point of Month #1 is the aviv,
and the focal point of the Feast of Unleavened Bread is the Seventh-day Sabbath
upon which, yet again, in the very middle of the 24 hours, that is, in the
early morning of the Sabbath, the sacrifice of the Omer is being brought. This
Sabbath is the foundation of the entire Scripture calendar,
it is the base upon which all of the remainder of the Counting of Omer rests.
It is the accession day before the subsequent seven weeks where the Seventh
Shabbat constitutes the Feast of Sabbaths, that is, the Day of Pentecost. In
the count of fifty the Seventh Day Sabbath including the morning of the Waving
of the Sheaf, Hag HaOmer, is the first day, and the
Seventh Day Sabbath of Pentecost, aka. Feast of Weeks, aka. Day of Sabbaths, is the fiftieth day. More…
It is only self-evident that the first-first Course of
Priests begins their service at the beginning of the Sabbath of the Omer and
continues until and including the next Sabbath.[2]
I don’t find any mention in the Scriptures for any
complicated splitting of services over two weeks due to whichever Feast Days
when priests from other courses join in as needed, and I don’t believe there is
any reason for thus complicating the schedule or the reckoning of courses.
Thusly numbering the courses of priests, there will be full harmony between the
numbers assigned to the weeks of Omer and the numbered Courses of Priests. No
reason for confusion!... Thus, the 1st
Course of Priests do their duty through the end of the 1st Sabbath
cycle, the 2nd Course of Priests do their duty through the end of
the 2nd Sabbath cycle, etc., even through the end of the 24th
Sabbath cycle. When the 24th Course of Priests has completed their
course, they are replaced by the 1st Course. What could be more
natural? When this happens to coincide with the last week before the
First-First or the Second-First Course, then so be it! Isn’t their time cut
short anyhow by an intermediary seven days of either the Feast of Unleavened
Bread or of the Feast of Tabernacles?! No need for feeling robbed of a blessing
or for having to serve double duty, is there? Some will be more blessed than
others perhaps, that is, when there is an extra leap month added to the year.
But then, isn’t it only good that some are getting extra training for matters
of special importance?!!!
The priests of the Second-First course naturally begin
their service at the beginning of the Seventh-day Sabbath within the Feast of
Tabernacles, thus mirroring the procedure during the Feast of Unleavened Bread.
Indeed, this is exactly what I find being confirmed by the New Testament
record, where I find clear evidence through the multiple witnesses of several
of the Gospel writers re this particular:
1.
Luke 6:1 provides for us the reference to the courses, that is, by the
Greek word “δευτεροπρωτω” meaning “Second-First” and referencing the 1st
course of cycle #2 of the priests.
2.
Shem Tov’s Hebrew Matthew 12:9 is providing
(cf. 1,
2)
that this same event is an event at the very point of the beginning of the
year, that is, by means of the Hebrew word ‘ketz,’
which word has been thoroughly misunderstood and mistranslated, but which word,
upon a thorough Scripture
word study has been found to point to the very beginning of something, not
to the end of something – though, as all can see, this point in time in a
cyclical event such as the year will coincide one with the other, and thus the
confusion… While considering this particular eight day cycle of priestly
services, beginning with the Seventh-day Sabbath within the Feast of
Tabernacles, well, this priestly week of temple services, this cycle of eight
days (1+7=8,) will necessarily spill over into the beginning of the Scripture
year which begins with the day labeled Tishri 22, the 22nd day of
the 7th month of the Scripture year. Thus, the corresponding week,
the seven day cycle within the eight day course, will indeed be also the 1st
week, albeit, in most years, an incomplete week, of the new Scripture year.
. . . . . . .
Naturally, the last considerations above resolve any
and all matters re dating, e.g. the 8th course of Abijah, and the Second-First Sabbath, etc… while
contributing also very much to the
overall layout of the Scripture calendar as applied upon the events relayed in
the Gospels re the years of Yeshua’s ministry.
Further considerations:
Re Zacharias and the course of Abia:
Luke 1:5 (KJV) "There
was in the days of Herod, the king of
Luke 1:23 (TLT) AndG2532 it came
to pass,G1096 that, in that mannerG5613 were concludedG4130 theG3588 daysG2250 of hisG846
ministrationG3009 and he
departedG565 toG1519 his ownG848 house.G3624
Luke 1:23 (KJV) AndG2532 it came
to pass,G1096 that, as soon asG5613 theG3588 daysG2250 of hisG846
ministrationG3009 were accomplished,G4130 he departedG565 toG1519 his ownG848 house.G3624
Re
the season of the Second-First course of priestly services:
Luk 6:1(KJV) “And it came to pass on the second Sabbath after
the first, that he went through the corn fields; and his disciples
plucked the ears of corn, and did eat…”
The priests followed an annual service calendar
established since the days of king David and Samuel,
the prophet. Each family of priests was on duty at the temple one certain eight
day period every semi-year, from Sabbath to Sabbath [i.e. from sunset one
Friday until darkness eight days later:]
“David… divided them also into courses: and
when he had separated the priests from them, he found of these priests
twenty-four courses, sixteen of the house of Eleazar,
and eight of that of Ithamar; and he ordained that
one course should minister to God eight days, from sabbath to sabbath.
And thus were the courses distributed by lot, in the presence of David, and Zadok and Abiathar the high
priests, and of all the rulers; and that course which came up first was written
down as the first, and accordingly the second, and so on to the twenty-fourth;
and this partition hath remained to this day. He also made twenty-four
parts of the tribe of Levi; and when they cast lots, they came up in the same manner
for their courses of eight days.” (Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews,
Book 7, Chapter 14:7. Cf. Josephus, The life of Flavius Josephus,
paragraph #1. Cf. also Matthew Henry’s Commentary on the Whole Bible: 2 Kings
11:4-12; 1 Chr 24:1-19.)
The priests
were divided into twenty-four courses, and a full and accurate record was made
regarding this division. Each course was thoroughly organized under its chief,
and each was to come to
The
Levites, whose duty it was to assist in the sanctuary service, were organized
and allotted their part with similar precision (RH Oct. 5, 1905). {3BC 1128.5}
The statement of Earnest L. Martin, re the first course
beginning within the last Shabbat of the preceding month, finds its resolution
upon the within discoveries re the beginning of the Scripture year. That is,
the beginning of the Second-first cycle begins with the last Seventh-day
Sabbath prior to the Scripture year beginning with Tishri 22 (cf. Earnest L. Martin, “The Star that
Astonished the World,” chapter 5, Part 1 & 2.)
Re Aviv 10 and the date given in Ezekiel 40:1, “in the beginning
of the year, in the tenth day of the month,”
(which dates may be considered also in conjunction with Ezekiel 43:18-27 &
45:18-23), I believe that there may well be reasons for perceiving Ezekiel’s
use of the words “בראשׁ
השׁנה,” “the beginning of the year,” as possibly referencing
the seventh month and not necessarily the month of Abib.
That the first course of the first cycle of the
twenty-four courses began in Aviv and not at the time of the biblical new year
beginning with the Eight Day following the Feast of Tabernacles should be clear
from Exodus 40:2, 13-16, though apparently this arrangement of twenty-four
courses was established by Samuel and king David (1 Chr
9:22) and then reestablished by Ezra (Ezra 2:36-39. Cf. also 1 Chr. 27:1-2.)
Earnest L. Martin’s statements re skipping course counts during the Feast days and extra Shabbats
might perhaps at first sight seem reasonable, that is, prior to a recognition
re the 1st course beginning with the Sabbath of the Omer
Sacrifice. Cf. Acts 13:42:
“The nextG3342 Sabbath” (KJV;) Earnest L.
Martin’s suggests “the betwixt Sabbath,” but I am now convinced that a
more correct translation is “the ensuing Sabbath hours,” that is, following a
meeting on Sabbath eve [Friday night,] further meetings were being requested
for the remainder of the same Sabbath the following morning:
Strong’s G3342:
“From G3326 and a
form of G4862; betwixt (of place or person); (of time) as
adjective intervening, or (by implication) adjoining.”)
Luke 6:1: “σαββατωG4521 N-DSN δευτεροπρωτωG1207
A-DSN.”
However, Earnest L. Martin’s statement to the effect that all the
priest families cooperated in the services during those special times of the
year seems sustained. Cf. 2 Chr. 5:11:
“for all the priests that were present
were sanctified, and did not then wait by course…”
Comments and donations freely
accepted at:
Tree
of Life©
c/o
General Delivery
Nora
[near SE-713 01]
eMail: TreeOfLifeTime@gmail.com
Invitation to Tree of
Life Chronology Forums©:
You
are hereby warmly invited to join Tree of
Life Chronology Forums©
where the within historical paradigm and more is the focus of an ongoing
dialogue.
Please
come to Tree
of Life Chronology Forums©
and share your valuable points of view such that we may all grow in knowledge
and wisdom!
The GateWays into Tree of Life Chronology Forums©
Without recourse. All Rights Reserved. Tree of Life©
[1] This matter of the 24 courses of priests
and Levites was first brought to my attention by Earnest L. Martin while
considering the meaning of “δευτεροπρωτω”
(Luke 6:1) and “the course of Abia” (Luke 1:5.) As
reflected by the remaining paragraphs of this footnote, I have thus far been
building upon the assumption that “δευτεροπρωτω”
of Luke 6:1 is a word pertaining to the two annual cycles of 24 courses of the priests
and Levites. However, upon recognizing that the most apparently likely
numbering pertaining to each of those courses
(e.g. “δευτεροπρωτω;” a word accordingly pointing to a fall event,)
as reflected within this article, stands in conflict with my spring
placement of the event recorded in Luke 6:1, I was prompted to do some further
studies re the meaning of “δευτεροπρωτω,” and re my
placement of the Luke 6:1 event. The results
of that study makes it likely that “δευτεροπρωτω” is:
1) not only a word pointing to the courses of priests and
Levites, but also a word pointing…
2) to the
first of the eight Sabbaths within the Counting of Omer;
3) a word indicating a double foremost
Sabbath, that is, a) a weekly Seventh Day Sabbath in commemoration of the
Creator of the Universe, and b) the Waving of the Sheaf Sabbath, which is the
first of eight Seventh Day Sabbaths within the Reckoning of Omer towards
Pentecost; and
4) a word pointing to the fact that, at the sunset towards the end of the Waving of the Sheaf Sabbath, the 2nd score of 50 is made towards the Day of Pentecost (cf. this link!)
Thus, if Luke’s word “δευτεροπρωτω”is indeed a word in reference to the courses of
priests and Levites, as suggested by Earnest L. Martin, then it seems obvious to me that Strong’s Dictionary
is making an error re the specific Sabbath associated with that Greek term,
i.e. Strong’s G1207: δευτερόπρωτος. If so, then this error is likely based upon an
assumption that the reckoning of the priestly courses begin in Abib/Nissan, the first Moon. That is indeed when the
numbering of the priestly courses do begin – or at
least the second round of priestly courses! Cf. this link,
this link,
and this link!
Thus a corrected Strong’s entry could read as follows:
Strong’s G1207 – ToL correction:
δευτερόπρωτος; deuteroprōtos; dyoo-ter-op'-ro-tos; From G1208 and G4413; second first,
that is, (specifically) a designation of the [Seventh Day] Sabbath within the
Paschal week (being the second Sabbath after Passover day, and the first
of the eight Seventh Day Sabbaths within the Reckoning of Omer towards
Pentecost [Pentecost being the last day of 50 within the annual celebration of
Seventh Day Sabbaths known also as the Day of the Sabbaths]: KJV - second . . .
after the first.”
The corresponding term “first
first,” πρωτοπρωτος, if such a term is ever used?, would then be the First Day of the Feast of Unleavened
Bread.
To make
my (conditional) corrections stand out more clearly within the original
Strong’s entry, consider this:
Strong’s
G1207: δευτερόπρωτος; deuteroprōtos; dyoo-ter-op'-ro-tos; From G1208 and G4413; second first,
that is, (specifically) a designation of the [Seventh Day] Sabbath immediately
after within the Paschal week (being the second Sabbath after
Passover day, and the first of the seven eight Seventh
Day Sabbaths intervening before within the Reckoning of Omer towards Pentecost
[Pentecost
being the last day of 50 within the annual celebration of Seventh Day Sabbaths
known also as the Day of the Sabbaths]: KJV - second . . . after the
first.”
[2] Cf. footnote #1!