Re Tiberius:

Re the death of Tiberius: “Detained, however, by bad weather and the increasing violence of his illness, he died a little later in the villa of Lucullus, in the seventy-eighth year of his age and the twenty-third of his reign, on the seventeenth day before the Kalends of April, in the consulship of Gnaeus Acerronius Proculus and Gaius Pontius Nigrinus.” (Suetonius, The Lives of the Caesars, The Life of Tiberius, 73.)

- Tiberius was appointed the heir of Augustus on June 26, 1 BCE [Tammuz 4 or 5, 1 BCE].

- Tiberius died on 4 Adar I/Adar II, 23 CE [March 16, 23 CE.]

 

Considerations:

23rd = 22+ years of reign

78th = ? years of age

In my considerations re NT chronology thus far I have not used the above quote of Suetonius for the purpose of determining Tiberius years of age or years of reign. Nevertheless, I see no conflict with this statement of Suetonius and my findings until this point in time.

                                                                                                                                                                                                   

 

Re Caius:

“58 On the ninth day before the Kalends of February at about the seventh hour he hesitated whether or not to get up for luncheon… the others dispatched him with thirty wounds; for the general signal was "Strike again." Some even thrust their swords through his privates…”

(Suetonius, The Lives of the Caesars, The Life of Caligula, 58)

 

Considerations:

7th = ? hour of day

 

Re Claudius:

He died on the third day before the Ides of October in the consulship of Asinius Marcellus and Acilius Aviola, in the sixty-fourth year of his age and the fourteenth of his reign. (Suetonius, The Lives of the Caesars, The Life of Claudius, 45.)

 

10 [Legamen ad paginam Latinam]Having spent the greater part of his life under these and like circumstances, he became emperor in his fiftieth year by a remarkable freak of fortune.

 

(Suetonius, The Lives of the Caesars, The Life of Claudius, 7 & 10.)

 

 

§         Claudius was born August 1, 24 BCE [Tammuz or Av 26, 24 BCE.]

§         Claudius’ de jure reign began in his 50th year of life when Caius died: In the afternoon on January 24, 27 CE [Tevet (or Shevat) [10th (or 11th) Moon] 21, 27 CE.]

§         Claudius’ son Britannicus was born, most likely, on January 20, 26 CE [Tevet or Shevat (10th or 11 Moon) 11 or 12, 26 CE,] (or less likely in January or February, 27 CE) and he died before the end of extended festivities attributed to the feast of Saturn in (December, 40 CE or) January 41 CE [Tevet or Shevat, (40/) 41 CE.]

§         Claudius’ daughter Octavia was born between mid May, 28 CE and mid June, 29 CE.

§         Claudius’ wife Messalina, the mother of Britannicus and Octavia, was killed in 32 CE after she married another man behind Claudius’ back and conspired to have Claudius killed. Narcissus took the initiative for this and was nominated as emperor of Rome for one day in order to accomplish this purpose.

§         The marriage of Claudius and Agrippina, the Agrippina’s killing of Octavia’s former fiancé Lucius Silanus, Octavia’s espousal to Domitian (Nero,) and the adoption of Domitian as Claudius’ son all took place in 33 CE – at a time when Domitian was 9 years old and Octavia was only 3 or 4 years old.

§         Octavia was married to Nero (between December 15 and 31, 39 CE) at an age of only 10 or 11, Nero being then 16 years old.

§         Josephus is making no statement as to the length of Claudius’ “reign” per se, but is making instead a statement re the length of time that Claudius was “administering the government.” Considering the apparent fact that Claudius was a consul, and thus a part of the government, prior to becoming emperor of Rome, I find that Josephus’ statement “But Claudius himself, when he had administered the government thirteen years, eight months, and twenty days, died” is referencing a time period beginning with Tishri 22, 26 CE, and ending, when Claudius died, on either Zif 21 or Sivan 21, 40 CE [May 22 or else June 20 or 21, 40 CE.]

§         Claudius’ death was concealed for almost 4 or 5 month until October 13, 40 CE when his death was finally made public.

 

 

 

Considerations:

o        64th = 23 + 40 = 63+ years of age

o        50th = 23 + 26 = 49+ years of age

o        14th = 40 - 27 = 13+ years of reign

 

 

 

 

 

Re Britannicus:

 

 

 

Re Nero:

“In the eleventh year of his age, he was adopted by Claudius, and placed under the tuition of Anneus Seneca” (C. Suetonius Tranquillus, The Lives of the Caesars [6, 7] (ed. Alexander Thomson))

He [Nero] died in the thirty-second year of his age, upon the same day on which he had formerly put Octavia to death” (C. Suetonius Tranquillus, THE LIVES OF THE TWELVE CAESARS, NERO CLAUDIUS CAESAR:LVII.)

§         Nero was born December 15, 23 CE.

§         Nero began his de facto reign after a period of co-regency with Claudius, which, based upon Josephus’ reckoning of Nero’s years of reign, began between Aviv 1, 39 CE [March 14 or 15 or April 14, 39 CE]  and  Tishri 1,  39 CE [September 9 or October 8 or 9, 39 CE.]

§         Nero’s 1st civil year of de jure reign began Tishri 1, 39 CE, [September 9, or October 8 (or 9,) 39 CE,] which year is concurrent with his 16th civil year of life. He was not yet 17 years old, by Roman reckoning when Claudius died.

§         Josephus counts Nero’s 1st sacred year of reign from the beginning of Aviv 1, 40 CE [April 2 or May 2, 40 CE.] Josephus is using sacred years of reign when referencing certain time periods within the war of the Jews in his work The War of the Jews.

§         Nero’s reign, as recognized by Josephus, ended on Aviv 9, 53 CE [March 19, 53 CE,] when he first “heard of the insurrection in Gaul, on the anniversary of the day on which he killed his mother,” i.e. at the beginning of the Civil War, and not at his death.

§         Nero died some time within a very few days prior to the time when Galba, sometime between June 1 and June 6, 53 CE [between Sivan 24 and 30, 53 CE,] received the “advice… from Rome that Nero was slain…”

§         Other events during Nero’s reign:

1.       Nero’s poisoning of his step-brother Britannicus ((14 or) 15 years old) before the end of extended festivities attributed to the feast of Saturn in (December, 40 CE or) January, 41 CE [Tevet or Shevat, (40/) 41 CE.]

2.       Paul, the apostle, arrives to Rome [Monday night July 19, or Tuesday July 20, 45 CE;]

3.       Paul’s release from bondage in Rome [October 1, 45 CE;]

4.       Nero’s first Quinquennial games [October 3 or 5 through 12, 46 CE;]

5.       Nero’s comet [first seen in the lunar month between December 17, 46 CE and January 15, 47 CE;]

6.       Nero’s matricide [March 19, 47 CE;]

7.       The great earthquake in Pompeii [February 5, 48 CE;]

8.       Nero “dearly loved Poppaea, whom he married twelve days after his divorce from Octavia;”

9.       Octavia was divorced and later, “in her twentieth year,” killed, i.e. 19 years old [in the first half of 48 CE;]

10.    Nero’s daughter’s, Claudia Augusta, birth and death [March(?) and June(?), 48 CE;]

11.    Nero’s burning of Rome [July 19-26, 49 CE;]

12.    Seneca’s first letter to Paul (Chapter XII) re Nero’s fire of Rome and Nero’s persecution of Christians [March 28, 50 CE;]

13.    The apostle Paul’s last letter to Seneca [August 1, 50 CE;]

14.    Nero’s second Quinquennial games [October 3 or 5 through 12, 50 CE;]

15.    Seneca’s death [October, 50 CE;] and

16.    The death of Nero’s wife Poppaea [October, 50 CE.]

17.    The beginning of the War of the Jews: Artemisius [Jyar,] 51 CE [between May 30 and June 28, 51 CE;]

 

 

 

Considerations:

·         11th = ? year of age

·         32nd = 52 – 23 = 29+ years of age

 

 

Re Galba:

Unfavourable omens, and Seleucus’s warnings, delayed matters another five days. However, on the morning of the sixth, Otho posted his fellow-conspirators in the Forum at the gilt milestone near the Temple of Saturn while he entered the Palace to greet Galba (who embraced him in the usual way) and attended his sacrifice …” (Suetonius, The Twelve Caesars (translated by Robert Graves,) p.261-2.)

 

§         Galba began his reign as Caesar of Rome when, sometime between June 1 and June 6, 53 CE [between Sivan 24 and 30, 53 CE,] he received the “advice… from Rome that Nero was slain…”

§         Galba died after sunset on January 15, 54 CE [Day 15 in the 11th Moon, Shevat 15, 54 CE,] but Josephus counts Galba’s reign as ending on January 8, 54 CE [Shevat 8, 54 CE] when…

 

Piso:

§         Piso was adopted as Galba’s son on January 8, 54 CE [Shevat 8, 54 CE.]

§         Piso was killed before sunset January 15, 54 CE [Day 14 in the 11th Moon, Shevat 14, 54 CE.]

 

 

 

Considerations:

1.       6th = 5+ days of delay (verifiable by immediate context.)

 

 

 

 

 

Re Otho:

 “XI… His funeral was hastily performed, according to his own order, in the thirty-eighth year of his age, and ninety-fifth day of his reign.

XII… It is said likewise that he celebrated publicly the sacred rites of Isis (C. Suetonius Tranquillus, THE LIVES OF THE TWELVE CAESARS, A. SALVIUS OTHO:XI)

He then gave orders that no violence should be offered to any one; and keeping his chamber-door open until late at night, he allowed all who pleased the liberty to come and see him. At last, after quenching his thirst with a draught of cold water, he took up two poniards, and having examined the points of both, put one of them under his pillow, and shutting his chamber-door, slept very soundly, until, awaking about break of day, he stabbed himself under the left pap. Some persons bursting into the room upon his first groan, he at one time covered, and at another exposed his wound to the view of the bystanders, and thus life soon ebbed away. His funeral was hastily performed, according to his own order, in the thirty-eighth year of his age, and ninety-fifth day of his reign. (C. Suetonius Tranquillus, THE LIVES OF THE TWELVE CAESARS, A. SALVIUS OTHO:XI)

 

 

§         II. The emperor Otho was born upon the fourth of the calends of May [“IIII. Kal. Mai;” 28th April], in the consulship of Camillus Aruntius and Domitius Aenobarbus…” [According to my consulship list this may have been 18 CE.]

§         Otho’s de facto reign began when Galba died after sunset on January 15, 54 CE [Day 15 in the 11th Moon, Shevat 15, 54 CE.]

§         This allows for Otho’s accession period to be reckoned, alternatively, all the way from the beginning of the Civil War Aviv 9, 53 CE [March 19, 53 CE.]

§         Otho died on Adar III 22, the 22nd Day of the Fourteenth Moon, 54 CE [April 19, 54 CE.] Otho’s funeral was performed on April 19, 54 CE.

 

 

 

Considerations:

38th = 53 – 18? = 35+? years of age (? Based on consulship list uncertainty)

95th = (31-15) + 28 + 31 + 19 = 94– (94+ if counting all of the first day (Jan 15, 54,) i.e. Roman inclusive reckoning) day of reign

 

Re Vitellius:

XV. In the eighth month of his [Vitellius] reign, the troops both in Moesia and Pannonia revolted from him…

“XVIII. He [Vitellius] perished with his brother and son, in the fifty-seventh year of his age…”

 

(C. Suetonius Tranquillus, The Lives of the Caesars (ed. Alexander Thomson;) Vitellius XV-XVIII.)

In the eighth month of Vitellius’s reign… When Vespasian’s forces converged on Rome, he sent against them the troops… But on the following day… The soldiers put him through the torture before… they dragged his body to the Tiber with a hook and threw it in” (Gaius Suetonius Tranquillus, The Twelve Caesars, translated by Robert Graves, London, The Folio Society, MCMLXIV, p. 276-278.)

 

In the eighth month of Vitellius’s reign the Moesian and Pannonian legions repudiated him and swore allegiance to Vespasian…” (Gaius Suetonius Tranquillus, The Twelve Caesars, translated by Robert Graves, London, The Folio Society, MCMLXIV, p. 276.)

 

§         The emperor Aulus Vitellius, son of Lucius, was born on the eighth day before the Kalends of October, or according to some, on the seventh day before the Ides of September, in the consulship of Drusus Caesar and Norbanus Flaccus.” (Suetonius, The Lives of the Caesars, The Life of Vitellius: 3, p. 255.)

§         Vitellius reign is recognized by Josephus as having begun with the beginning of the Civil War on Aviv 9, 53 CE [March 19, 53 CE] on the anniversary of Nero’s matricide.

§         Vitellius died on Kislev 6 [December (24 or) 25,] 54 CE.

§         Upon Vitellius’ death Domitian, the son of Vespasian, was first [briefly] celebrated as the new Emperor of Rome.

 

Astronomical correlations to Vitellius’ reign:

Dio is giving reference to a comet during the reign of Vitellius as well as of a lunar eclipse in the middle of the summer. The following event satisfies all criteria provided in his record:

1.       The comet observation is confirmed by recordings of the ancient Chinese astronomers who states: “This comet had a tail measuring about 5 degrees and was seen between June 9 and July 9 of that year.” In 54 CE June 9 and July 9 are the days for the astronomical full moons, not necessarily the duration of the observation of the comet.

2.       There was a total lunar eclipse lasting 1 hour 46 minutes on Wednesday August 7, 54 CE at 04:36 UT, the first visible part of the eclipse beginning at 02:38 UT (i.e. beginning at 04:59 Jerusalem solar time.) (Also, on Tuesday, the Third Day of the Week, July 23, 54 CE at 11:41 AM and again on Wednesday, the Fifth Day of the week, August 21, 54 CE at 19:45 PM (local solar time from the Jerusalem horizon) there were partial solar eclipses but none of them were visible from the Roman Empire area.)

3.       From the language of Dio’s record, which could represent an indirect quote from a first hand observer, it appears as though the above referenced comet may have been (?) eclipsed by the moon on the very same day as the lunar eclipse, possibly (?) even concurrent with the lunar eclipse. – However, I am not proposing that such a two-fold event can be proven from Dio’s original Greek words alone!

 

 

 

Considerations:

1.       8th = 8+ month reign (seems confirmed by context, i.e. by e.g. Dispater sacrifice/founding of Rome/April 21 vs. December/Kislev/Tacitus/Josephus.)

 

 

 

Re Vespasian:

 

 

Re Titus:

Excessit in eadem qua pater villa Id. Sept. post biennium ac menses duos diesque XX quam successerat patri, altero et quadragesimo aetatis anno…

He died in the same farmhouse16 as his father, on the Ides of September, two years two months and twenty days after succeeding Vespasian, in the forty-second year of his age. When his death was made known, the whole populace mourned as they would for a loss in their own families, the senate hastened to the House before it was summoned by proclamation, and with the doors still shut, and then with them open, rendered such thanks to him and heaped such praise on him after death as they had never done even when he was alive and present.

                                                                                                             

(Suetonius, The Lives of the Caesars, The Life of Titus, 11, p. 339.)

 

 

 

§         Titus was born December 30, 27 CE [Tebeth (the 10th Moon) 12 or 13, 27 CE.]

§         Titus began his reign on June 24, 68 CE [Tammuz 5, 68 CE] after his father Vespasian died.

§         Titus died on “the Ides of September,” September 13, 70 CE [Elul or (or Tishri) (i.e. the 6th (or 7th) Moon) 18 or 19, 70 CE] “in the forty-second year of his age” as reckoned by Suetonius.

 

 

 

Considerations:

o        42nd:  69 – 27 = by conception: April 19, 70 - April 19, 27 = 43+, OR by delivery: December 30, 69 – December 30, 27 = 42+, OR by delivery less 3 months: September 30, 69 – September 30, 27 = 42+

 

 

 

 

 

 

Re Domitian:

 “16. .. Then he asked the time, and by pre-arrangement the sixth hour was announced to him, instead of the fifth, which he feared. Filled with joy at this, and believing all danger now past, he was hastening to the bath, when his chamberlain Parthenius changed his purpose by announcing that someone had called about a matter of great moment p377and would not be put off. Then he dismissed all his attendants and went to his bedroom, where he was slain.

“17:3 He was slain on the fourteenth day before the Kalends of October in the forty-fifth year of his age and the fifteenth of his reign…

 

(C. Suetonius Tranquillus, The Lives of the Twelve Caesars, The Life of Domitian)

 

 

 

o       Domitian was born on the ninth day before the Kalends of November…” [October 24, 39 CE (The Seventh or Eighth Moon (Tishri or Hesvan) 16 or 17, 39 CE.)]

o        Domitian’s reign began “on the Ides of September…” [September 13] of “the fifteenth [year as reckoned by Suetonius] of his reign” [70 CE (the 6th (or 7th) Moon (Elul or (or Tishri)) 18 or 19, 70 CE.)]

o        Domitian died on “the fifth hour…” [between 11 AM and 12 AM (considering Suetonius’ use of ordinals)] on “the fourteenth day before the Kalends of October…” [September 18, 85 CE (Elul or Tishri 9 (or 10,) 85 CE)] “in the forty-fifth year of his age and the fifteenth of his reign.”

o        Suetonius, Dio, and Tacitus are all using a Julian calendar and a Roman way of reckoning. Suetonius’ ordinal numbers are usually referencing the year following the corresponding birthday etc. rather than the year preceding it.

 

 

Considerations:                                                                         

o        6th = ? hour of day

o        5th = ? hour of day

o        45th = 84 – 39? = 45 Years of age, OR by conception: Jan 85 - Jan 40? = 45, OR by delivery less 3 months: July 24, 85 – July 24, 40? = 45

o        15th = 15+ years of reign

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Old considerations transferred from TheRegnalYears…EmperorsII:

 

:

1.       Re Britannicus: I have considered this before and found that the above technically incorrect but common mistake would actually resolve the apparent inconsistencies in Suetonius statements re Britannicus’ age.

2.       Re Vespasian:

3.       Re Titus:

Excessit in eadem qua pater villa Id. Sept. post biennium ac menses duos diesque XX quam successerat patri, altero et quadragesimo aetatis anno

He died in the same farmhouse16 as his father, on the Ides of September, two years two months and twenty days after succeeding Vespasian, in the forty-second year of his age. When his death was made known, the whole populace mourned as they would for a loss in their own families, the senate hastened to the House before it was summoned by proclamation, and with the doors still shut, and then with them open, rendered such thanks to him and heaped such praise on him after death as they had never done even when he was alive and present.

                                                                             

(Suetonius, The Lives of the Caesars, The Life of Titus, 11, p. 339.)

In my prior research re Titus I came to the following conclusion:

“(If Suetonius “forty-second year” is referencing the year following his 42nd birthday, or if Titus was born December 30, 27 CE, then we’d arrive instead on September 13, 69 CE.  If Suetonius “forty-second year” is referencing the year following his 42nd birthday, and if Titus was born December 30, 27 CE, then we’d arrive instead on September 13, 70 CE. )”

The above solution re Domitian would require the last of the above options, i.e. that Titus died on September 13, 70 CE. As best I can tell these requirements represent very popular common use of, and interpretation of, expressions such as these, not only in Latin, but also in English, Swedish and other Western countries.

4.       Re Domitian:

Occisus est XIIII. Kal. Octb. anno aetatis quadragensimo quinto, imperii quinto decimo.

(C. Suetonii Tranquilli, De Vita XII Caesarum, Domitianus.)

He was slain on the fourteenth day before the Kalends of October in the forty-fifth year of his age and the fifteenth of his reign.

(C. Suetonius Tranquillus, The Lives of the Twelve Caesars, The Life of Domitian)

According to the above premise and hypothesis interpreting “the fifteenth” as equal to “fifteen years old” is the solution to the present problem. According to this solution Domitian had completed 15 full years of reign on September 13, 85 CE, just five days prior to his death on September 18, 85 CE.

It would follow from the above that Domitian had his 45th birthday October 24, 84 CE. Accordingly Domitian was born October 24, 39 CE. How does this fit Suetonius’ statement re Vespasian, Domitian’s father?

1 Domitian was born on the ninth day before the Kalends of November of the year when his father was consul elect and was about to enter on the office in the following month…

(C. Suetonius Tranquillus, The Lives of the Twelve Caesars, The Life of Domitian)

When was Vespasian “consul elect and… about to enter on the office in the following month…?” I have found that Vespasian became the Emperor in 54 CE and that at that time Domitian was very young, but not younger than that he was seated upon the throne in the absence of his father. Clearly this is not the consulship referenced as prior to Domitian’s birth. I also find a note of mine in my consulship list re Vespasian in 35 CE. What is the source of this note? I find the following references of Suetonius re Vespasian’s consulships:

4 In the reign of Claudius he was sent in command of a legion to Germany, through the influence of Narcissus; from there he was transferred to Britain,9 where he fought thirty battles with the enemy. He reduced to subjection two powerful nations, more than twenty towns, and the island of Vectis,10 near Britain, partly under the leadership of Aulus Plautius, the consular governor, and partly under that of Claudius himself. 2 For this he received the triumphal regalia, and shortly after two priesthoods, besides the consulship, which he held for the last two months of the year. The rest of the time up to his proconsulate he spent in rest and retirement, through fear of Agrippina, who still had a strong influence over her son and hated any friend of Narcissus, even after the latter's death.

8 Returning to Rome under such auspices and attended by so great renown, after celebrating a triumph over the Jews, he added eight consulships to his former one; he also assumed the censorship and during the whole period of his rule he considered nothing more essential than first to strengthen the State, which was tottering and almost overthrown, and then to embellish it as well.

24 In his ninth consulship he had a slight illness in Campania, and returning at once to the city, he left for Cutiliaeº and the country about Reate, where he spent the summer every year. There, in addition to an increase in his illness, having contracted a bowel complaint by too free use of the cold waters, he nevertheless continued to perform his duties as emperor, even receiving embassies as he lay in bed. Taken on a sudden with such an attack of diarrhoea that he all but swooned, he said: "An emperor ought to die standing," and while he was struggling to get on his feet, he died in the arms of those who tried p321to help him, on the ninth day before the Kalends of July, at the age of sixty-nine years, seven months and seven days.e

(C. Suetonius Tranquillus, The Lives of the Twelve Caesars, The Life of Vespasian)

These passages makes it clear that:

1)       Vespasian’s first consulship was held under Claudius following most or all of his accomplishments under Claudius, and

2)       that Vespasian’s first consulship was held during “the last two months of the year,” i.e. in November and December, thus clearly identifying this consulship with the one associated with the birth of Domitian.

3)       Importantly, for the present purposes, Suetonius is also making it clear that the time period immediately following Vespasian’s 1st consulship was dominated by a “fear of Agrippina, who still had a strong influence over her son…” Considering this prominent reference to Nero and Agrippina it appears as though this first consulship of Vespasian must have occurred very closely prior to the death of Claudius, who was poisoned to death by Agrippina in the summer of 40 CE.

Accordingly, 39 CE is a most perfect fit for Domitian’s birth. What about Tacitus? I find only one reference to Vespasian in Tacitus’ Annals (Book XIV) and it points to a much later time in Nero’s reign. In Tacitus’ Histories I find quite a few references to Vespasian, but only one that references Vespasian’s 1st consulship:

“78… His thoughts now went back to omens from the past, for instance the sudden fall of a remarkably tall cypress tree on his estate. On the following day it had sprung up again at the same spot, and in due course grew as lofty as ever, spreading its boughs even more widely and luxuriantly. The seers were unanimous that this was a notable sign of future prosperity, and it seemed that the highest honours were promised to Vespasian while he was still a very young man. But at first the omen appeared to find its fulfilment in his triumphal awards, the consulship and the renown of his Jewish victory. Once these were achieved, he thought he was fated to be emperor.” (Tacitus, Histories, Book 2)