Without recourse. All Rights Reserved. Tree of Life©

Statement of belief: “Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth.” (John 17:17 KJV)

 

Created 5929± 10 10 2025 [2009-01-08]

Updated 5941(?) 02 05 2027 [2010-10-14]

Revised 5925[(*??*)] 08 22 2029 [2012-12-07]

Revised 5928[(*??*)] 11 18 2032 [2016-02-27] – re the accession of Artaxerxes I.

New Meaning in Familiar Texts

     “As soon as the seeker for truth opens the Bible to read the utterances of God with reverence, possessing an earnest desire to know "what saith the Lord," light and grace will be given him, and he will see wondrous things out of God's law. He will not regard the law of Jehovah as a yoke of bondage, but as the gracious commands of One who is all-wise and full of compassion. He will make haste to fulfill His requirements. Great truths which have been neglected and unappreciated for ages, will be revealed by the Spirit of God, and new meaning will flash out of familiar texts. Every page will be illuminated by the Spirit of truth. The Bible is not sealed but unsealed. The most precious truths are revealed; the living oracles are heard by wondering ears, and the consciences of men are aroused into action.” --TSS 30.  {CSW 34.3}

 

          “I have seen that the 1843 chart was directed by the hand of the Lord, and that it should not be altered; that the figures were as He wanted them; that His hand was over and hid a mistake in some of the figures, so that none could see it, until His hand was removed.” ({EW 74.1} The entire paragraph is quoted below!)

 

 

 

 

 

When did Xerxes/Ahasuerus reign begin?

 

And What About Artaxerxes I, Darius II, and Artaxerxes II?

 

 

Conclusions from the Elephantine Papyri and More

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Abstract:

Studying carefully the details of the Elephantine papyri dates in conjuntion with the corresponding Scripture passages I find all data necessary for placing narrowly the beginnings of the reigns of each of the above named Persian kings (cf. also the Elephantine papyri portion of this spread sheet:)

 

 

 

 

Considerations:

 

Two exact anchor points are given:

1.        AP 5. Elul 18 = Pachons 28, year 15 of Xerxes” - between sunset Sept 12 and sunrise Sept 13, 471 BCE.

2.         AP 6. Kislev 18 = Thoth [17], year 21, the beginning of the reign of Artaxerxes 1” - between sunset Jan 2 and sunrise Jan 3, 464 BCE.

 

What calendar(s) are being used for the reckoning of years in these two papyri? What may we learn from the exact anchor points above to answer this last question?

                Three calendars may be considered:

1.        The Egyptian calendar beginning with Thoth 1;

2.        The Babylonian/Persian calendar beginning with Nisanu/Abib 1; and

3.        The Scriptural/Jewish calendar beginning with Tishri 22.

 

In my prior version of this article I was using a much more complex and convoluted form of analysis, than I’ve now been blessed by. Please go to this link to discover simply and quickly:

1) Why the two papyri, AP 5 & AP6 are necessarily using Babylonian regnal year reckoning; and

2) That Ahasuerus’/Xerxes’ began his reign within the Babylonian year beginning 1 Nisan, 486 BCE.

 

 

 

A change of scribal dating policy is revealed during the reign of Artaxerxes I:

 

Although I do not have the direct and simple data available to me in order to be able to arrive at the answer to these last considerations, I can do so by looking at the greater pattern of dating for the 13 double dated documents available from the reign of Artaxerxes I:

 

Carefully considering this table of double dated papyri etc. it seems quite clear that at one point in time the scribes in Elephantine changed their procedure from a prior policy of using pure Egyptian regnal years to a new policy. According to this new policy the scribes apparently kept on using the Egyptian calendar date as such, but the regnal years were from this point of time tied to the Babylonian calendar, as per the prior policy used under King Ahasuerus/Xerxes. Thus there was at this point of time a change from non-accession year reckoning to accession year reckoning. This change of policy apparently took place some time between the dates given in AP 9 and the date of the Cairo Sandstone Stele. Is it possible that the Cairo Sandstone Stele is a marker of this event?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conclusions:

 

What part of the year did Ahasuerus and Artaxerxes begin their respective reigns?

 

It follows that some conclusions may be drawn re the time of year when these kings acceded to the throne:

 

The beginning of the reign of Artaxerxes I:

Given that Egyptian calendar, regnal year reckoning, was never used for any of the extant Elephantine papyri pertaining to Artaxerxes I’s reign, but only Babylonian/Persian calendar regnal years. Given also the dating discovered in the Book of Nehemiah showing that the Scripture fall-to-fall default reckoning precedes the Babylonian/Persian spring-to-spring reckoning.  Thirdly, given also the double dated (Babylonian/Persian calendar day dates vs Egyptian calendar day dates,) I find that Artaxerxes I acceded to the throne between the beginning of Nisan 1, 465 BCE and between the beginning of Tishri 22, 465 BCE [i.e. between (March 24 or) April 23 and November 19, 465 BCE.][1]

- Updated and revised [December 7, 2012,] reversing my prior stand re the order of the calendars, while also discovering a prime example of Seventh Day Sabbath keeping in the Old Testament (which definitely does not agree with the so called Lunar Sabbath teachings!)

- Updated and revised [February 27, 2016] primarily by removing all references to Egyptian regnal year reckoning, which were never used by any of the extant Elephantine papyri of Artaxerxes I’s time.

 

 

The beginning of the reign of Ahasuerus/Xerxes:

Given the clear and concise tabular data within the article of mine under this link, it is now clear that Ahasuerus acceded to the throne between Nisan 1, 486 BCE and the beginning of Nisan 1, 485 BCE.

Given the fact that, in the Book of Esther, the Scriptural and Babylonian year reckoning, relative to the years of Ahasuerus’ reign, are the same for the month of Adar, that is, during the 8th through the 12th months, it is obvious that the Scriptural calendar reckoning of Ahasuerus’ years are trailing the Babylonian regnal year reckoning during that same era. From this fact I conclude that the reign of Ahasuerus/Xerxes began not only subsequent to the beginning of Nisan 1, 486 BCE, but also subsequent to the beginning of Tishri 22, 486 BCE, while also prior to the beginning of Nisan 1, 485 BCE. However, please cf. the analysis found within this article of mine…

Combining the statements within the two above paragraphs it follows that Ahasuerus’/Xerxes’ reign began subsequent to the beginning of Tishri 22, 486 BCE and prior to the beginning of Nisan 1, 485 BCE.

 

 

The beginning of the reign of Darius II:

Given that all of the Egyptian, the Babylonian, and the Scriptural calendar reckoning are being clearly identifiable from the available papyri (cf. this table and this table,) the beginning of the reign of Darius II may be certainly narrowed down as follows:

Given that Darius II’s 9th year of reign per Egyptian non-accession reckoning began (cf. AP 25, which was dated between sunset Nov 16 and sunrise Nov 17, 416 BCE) with Thoth 1, 417 BCE (beginning at sunrise December 5, 417 BCE) I conclude that his reign began between Thoth 1, 425 BCE and the beginning of Thoth 1, 424 BCE.

Given also that Darius II’s 4th year of reign per the Babylonian calendar began (cf. AP 20, which was dated between sunrise and sunset Sept 2, 420 BCE) at the beginning of Aviv 1, 420 BCE, I conclude that he acceded to the throne between Aviv 1, 424 BCE and the beginning of Aviv 1, 423 BCE.

Given also that Darius II’s 3rd year of reign per the Scriptural/Jewish calendar began (cf. Kraeling 6, which was dated between sunrise and sunset on June 11, 420 BCE) at the beginning of Tishri 22, 421 BCE, I conclude that Darius II acceded to the throne between Tishri 22, 424 BCE and the beginning of Tishri 22, 423 BCE.

Combining the statements within the three above paragraphs it follows that the reign of Darius II began between Tishri 22, 424 BCE and Thoth 1, 424 BCE. Furthermore, because all three calendars, the Egyptian, the Babylonian, and the Scriptural/Jewish calendars, are defined for Darius, it follows that so also are the accession years of the Babylonian and the Scriptural/Jewish calendars…If the total number of years of reign of his predecessor, Artaxerxes I was known in terms of those calendars then his accession year would likewise be known, but thus far I do not have a way of ascertaining Artaxerxes’ Scriptural regnal years exactly…

 

 

The beginning of the reign of Artaxerxes II:

Given that only the Egyptian regnal years are well defined by the dates in the available papyri for this time period, and given that the scribal practice during Darius II of specifying both regnal years when different is not followed in Kraeling 9 & 10 and the beginning of Artaxerxes II’s reign can only be defined in terms of the Egyptian calendar so far as the Elephantine papyri are concerned:

Given that Artaxerxes II’s 3rd year of reign per Egyptian non-accession reckoning began (cf. Kraeling 10, which was dated between sunrise March 9 and sunrise March 10, 402 BCE) with Thoth 1, 403 BCE (beginning at sunrise December 2, 403 BCE) I conclude that the reign of Artaxerxes II began between Thoth 1, 405 BCE and the beginning of Thoth 1, 404 BCE.

However, given also the fact that Ezra is reckoning time using Scriptural years and that the 7th & 8th Scriptural regnal years of Artaxerxes II may be considered defined by 1) the evidence pointed out in SDA Bible Commentary, Vol. 3, pp. 369-374, entitled “Additional Note on Chapter 7 re the events of Nehemiah preceding the events of Ezra, and 2) in conjunction thereto the exact double date specified in Ezra 10:9, i.e. Day Three of the week and the exact day of the month, the year being the 8th regnal year of Artaxerxes, I conclude that the 8th year of Artaxerxes began with Tishri 22, 397 BCE and not a year later. Thus, the Scriptural accession year of Artaxerxes II is found to have begun Tishri 22, 405 BCE going through Tishri 21, 404 BCE.

Combining the statements within the last two paragraphs above it follows that the reign of Darius II began between Thoth 1, 405 BCE and the beginning of Tishri 22, 404 BCE.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More considerations by Ellen G. White:

 

          “September 23, the Lord showed me that He had stretched out His hand the second time to recover the remnant of His people, [SEE PAGE 86.] and that efforts must be redoubled in this gathering time. In the scattering, Israel was smitten and torn, but now in the gathering time God will heal and bind up His people. In the scattering, efforts made to spread the truth had but little effect, accomplished but little or nothing; but in the gathering, when God has set His hand to gather His people, efforts to spread the truth will have their designed effect. All should be united and zealous in the work. I saw that it was wrong for any to refer to the scattering for examples to govern us now in the gathering; for if God should do no more for us now than He did then, Israel would never be gathered. I have seen that the 1843 chart was directed by the hand of the Lord, and that it should not be altered; that the figures were as He wanted them; that His hand was over and hid a mistake in some of the figures, so that none could see it, until His hand was removed. [THIS APPLIES TO THE CHART USED DURING THE 1843 MOVEMENT, AND HAS SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE CALCULATION OF THE PROPHETIC PERIODS AS IT APPEARED ON THAT CHART. THE NEXT SENTENCE EXPLAINS THAT THERE WAS AN INACCURACY WHICH IN THE PROVIDENCE OF GOD WAS SUFFERED TO EXIST. BUT THIS DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE PUBLICATION OF A CHART SUBSEQUENTLY WHICH WOULD CORRECT THE MISTAKE, AFTER THE 1843 MOVEMENT WAS PAST, AND THE CALCULATION AS THEN MADE HAD SERVED ITS PURPOSE.]”  {EW 74.1} - Please note that the capitalized text within brackets is added by the editor!

 

 

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner.YOUR-3F778DA96A\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\TheRegnalYearsAndDatesOfRomanEmperorsII.htm

 

 

1843 Chart II

The 1843 Chart

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments and donations freely accepted at:

 

Tree of Life©

c/o General Delivery

Nora [near SE-713 01]

Sweden Republic© in Adamah Republic©

 

 

eMail: TreeOfLifeTime@gmail.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You are hereby cordially invited to subscribe to our free email course:

 

 

 

* You’ll discover firsthand the fundamentals for understanding Scripture time reckoning as used by the ancient historian Josephus as well as by all the authors of the Holy Scriptures! Much of this knowledge has - until now - been lost to the best of scholars for many centuries.

“Great truths which have been neglected and unappreciated for ages will be revealed by the Spirit of God, and new meaning will flash out of familiar texts. Every page will be illuminated by the Spirit of truth. The Bible is not sealed but unsealed. The most precious truths are revealed; the living oracles are heard by wondering ears, and the consciences of men are aroused into action.”

* You will make many surprising and exciting discoveries re the exact dates for Jesus’ birth, crucifixion, resurrection, ascension… as well as the exact dates of many, many more events found in your Bible, especially re the New Testament times.

* You’ll discover the exact dates for the 12+ Roman Caesars beginning with Julius Caesar, Augustus, Tiberius, Gaius, Claudius, Nero, Vespasian, Titus…

* You’ll discover the exact dates of most of the kings of Juda beginning with Hyrcanus in the 2nd century BCE, Herod the Great, Agrippa, and many other Judean kings and proconsuls, e.g. Pontius Pilate…

* You’ll discover many things re the Scripture traditions honored by all the disciples and believers of the Apostolic times – as well as by the Jews – traditions that have been long forgotten or not correctly restored when previously re-discovered…

* Be prepared to re-think and to re-learn… Things may not be as you always thought they were… But you’ll decide!

 

 

“Get Your Tree of Life © 1st Century Chronology & Scripture Calendar Introductory Course NOW…”:


It is a very simple Basics 101 type course entitled:

 

Tour Guide towards “Tuning into the Frequency of the Creator & Becoming Oriented in His Time…”

 

It is one short email per week for you to enjoy with your family and friends…

 

Click here to subscribe NOW!

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner.YOUR-3F778DA96A\Application Data\Microsoft\tolcf\index.php

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

mailto:PowerOfChoice@gamaliel.intranets.com

Nedstat Basic - Free web site statistics
Personal homepage website counter
Free counter

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner.YOUR-3F778DA96A\Application Data\Microsoft\index.html

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner.YOUR-3F778DA96A\Application Data\Microsoft\index.html

Without recourse. All Rights Reserved. Tree of Life©

 

 

 

 



[1] SNB March 24, 465 BCE sunset: 18:08:43; moonset: 19:08:05; lag: 59 min 38 sec; illumination: 1.33% è March 24 or 25, 465 BCE; April 23, 465 BCE sunset: 18:25:52; moonset: 19:52:53; lag: 87 min 01 sec; illum.: 2.48% è April 23 or 24, 465 BCE; September 18, 465 BCE sunset: 18:08:01; moonset: 18:31:21; lag: 23 min 20 sec; illum.: 2.26% è Sep 19 or 20, 465 BCE; October 17, 465 BCE sunset: 17:32:06; moonset: 17:42:47; lag: 10 min 41 sec è Oct 18 or 19, 465 BCE.